Vince Cable warns GMB against co-ordinated strikes


Vince Cable is heckled during his speech to the GMB conference

Related Stories

Business Secretary Vince Cable was booed and heckled as he warned delegates at the GMB union's conference that co-ordinated strike action may lead to tougher union laws.

Unions say there could be significant public sector strikes on 30 June.

Mr Cable said that if the level of strikes remained low there would not be a compelling case for tighter laws.

But he warned that the pressure on him to act would ratchet up if there was widespread disruption.

Mr Cable was heckled, and met with boos and jeers at various points throughout his speech, the only cheers coming when he mentioned the prospect of a day of industrial action across significant parts of the public sector.

The 700,000-member GMB union represents workers across all industries in both the private and public sectors.

But the general secretary GMB, Paul Kenny, said Mr Cable's speech may have increased the chance of widespread disruption.

"The GMB and other unions are still in negotiation. My honest view is that speech today... I think that has been very unhelpful," he told the BBC.


Vince Cable asked for "cool heads" as the country faces its economic woes, but the temperature among GMB delegates was rising as he warned of tougher times ahead.

The business secretary took to the stage to polite applause and the end of his speech received much the same response.

In between he endured booing and heckling, with a group of delegates unfurling banners at the back of the auditorium in protest at the cuts.

One GMB member - described by other delegates as from "that tough Yorkshire branch" - walked out.

But the business secretary remained on an even keel throughout. Still, he will have been left in no doubt that feelings are running high.

"There was a bit of heckling. But you expect that," Mr Cable told reporters as he left the Brighton Centre.

One suspects, though, that he had better get used to it.

"I think people's reaction on the ground is going to be 'if you're going to threaten us, bring it on'."

'Serious damage'

Addressing delegates in Brighton, Mr Cable said: "We are undoubtedly entering a difficult period. Cool heads will be required all round. Despite occasional blips, I know that strike levels remain historically low, especially in the private sector.

"On that basis, and assuming this pattern continues, the case for changing strike law is not compelling.

"However, should the position change, and should strikes impose serious damage to our economic and social fabric, the pressure on us to act would ratchet up.

"That is something which both you, and certainly I, would want to avoid," he said to loud jeers from the audience, at which point the chair had to intervene.

Mr Cable conceded that feelings were running high in the trade union movement, as demonstrations in March showed.

But he called for unions and the government to work together to deal with economic challenges.

"I want a mature and productive relationship with trade unions," he said.

'Double standards'

Unions reacted angrily to the speech.

Rules on industrial action

  • A strike may be called if a simple majority of those who respond to the ballot vote in favour of strike action.
  • The action must begin within four weeks of the ballot (or eight weeks if the trade union and employer agree to an extension), with a minimum one week's notice being given to the employer.
  • Union members are not obliged to go on strike - you can choose whether you wish to take part in the industrial action your trade union has called.
  • There is no minimum turn-out required for the ballot to be valid.

Source: Directgov

"Government ministers come onto the TV and the media, saying it's ok to have protests and strikes in Egypt but when it comes to workers' protests in this country we think we should legislate them out of business," the GMB's Paul Kenny said.

"It's double standards. They wouldn't apply the same rules they're talking about applying for trade union ballots as they would do in electing MPs, or even the recent AV referendum," he added.

Len McCluskey, general secretary of the UK's largest union Unite, said Mr Cable ought to be ashamed.

"How can a professed liberal seek to crack down on human rights?" he said.

"Talking tough about cracking down on working people is a circus engineered by a government that is clueless about the real problems facing this country, which is how do we breathe life back into our shops, businesses and High Streets and how do we get the millions on the dole back to work."

Ahead of the conference, the Chancellor, George Osborne, said Mr Cable was voicing the coalition's position.

"Vince Cable is absolutely right. He speaks, of course, for the government, and I agree with him," Mr Osborne told the BBC.

"What Vince is saying is that if we got into a cycle of destructive strikes, we'd have to think again, but let's hope we don't get there."

The prime minister's spokesman said there were no current plans to amend strike laws but "it is something we keep under review".

Higher threshold
GMB members hold up banner saying Vince Cable "not welcome" Some members held up banners during the speech

The British Chambers of Commerce (BCC) said Mr Cable was right to warn against mass strikes in the months ahead.

"In the current climate, large-scale industrial action would have a significant impact on business confidence and inward investment, which are both critical to the UK's economic recovery," Dr Adam Marshall, director of policy at the BCC, said.

The Mayor of London, Boris Johnson, and employers' organisation the CBI have already called for tougher trade union laws.

Currently, a strike may be called if a simple majority of those who respond to the ballot vote in favour of strike action.

But Mr Johnson wants laws to prevent a strike taking place unless at least half of the union members in a workplace take part in a ballot.

He has criticised the government as being "lily-livered" for not taking firmer action.

The CBI has called for a minimum of 40% of union members balloted to be in favour of a strike before it can take place.

Some 250,000 civil servants in the PCS union are currently being balloted on whether to take strike action over government spending cuts.

Any PCS action could lead to co-ordinated walkouts, with 750,000 teachers, lecturers and other workers taking part in the largest joint-union walkout in years.


More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 606.

    How funny!
    When VC was merely an opposition MP and spoke "the truth" he was lauded as a sage and under-utilised statesman.
    Now he's a minister and speaks the truth, he's heckled.
    But what he said was true, strike if your terms and conditions are under threat, strike if you have a disagreement with your own management.
    Striking to undermine a democratically elected national government is wrong.

  • rate this

    Comment number 588.

    This is not a debate about cuts, and who hurts more. This is a debate about the democratic right of all workers to withdraw their labour. The key word there is democratic, all the proposed reforms are asking is that 40% of a workforce vote to strike before it becomes valid ie democratic. Surely if the degree of oppression is as bad as some commentators here suggest 40% should be a simple hurdle...

  • rate this

    Comment number 572.

    As far as I can see the coalition government are taking up the reigns that were started by Mrs Thatcher. She broke the Unions and now this government wants to bury them! They cannot bear the fact that the Unions stand up for the ordinary worker whether they are in the Public or the Private Sector. I can't see this episode doing the LibDems any favours at all, especially after the Uni fees debacle.

  • rate this

    Comment number 561.

    As a student, I don't want my teachers and lecturers to strike, but if they decide to then I will support them - they have every right to be outraged at the way the Coalition is treating them (and, indeed the entire public sector), and threats like this one exemplify why. Taking away civil rights is not the way to convince people to be cooperative.

  • rate this

    Comment number 185.

    Although i see the need for unions to protect the working man; i feel that modern union practice has little to do with 'fair' deals but for grubbing as much money as they can regardless of external facts. The death of a good few English manufacturers have been the result of greedy unions as much as mis-managment. £40K/Annum for a tube driver? and they want more? that's a joke it really is.


Comments 5 of 18


More Business stories



BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.