Behind the scenes at the IMF in Rio

 
Christine Lagarde Christine Lagarde is still likely to be the next head of the IMF

We're supposed to be talking capital controls at this IMF conference in Rio, but naturally, the battle for the leadership of the Fund has been a hot topic as well. The consensus on that subject is easier to summarise.

Everyone here: senior officials and economists from inside and outside the Fund, thinks that Christine Lagarde will be the next head of the Fund.

But they wish it wasn't so.

They don't like the symbolism of the job going to yet another French citizen; they worry that she will not be able to inject fresh thinking into the management of the eurozone crisis, and more than a few still harbour hopes of a last minute revolt.

That's not likely, but the fact it is even a possibility tells you how much the Europeans' approach to the question has alienated the rest of the world.

"For once, the Europeans have come together and acted quickly," said one exasperated participant, "and it's probably the one time when they would have been better off deliberating, letting Lagarde "emerge" as a candidate after paying due attention to other candidates from the rest of the world."

For once, Europe's talent for indecision might have served it well.

Stanley Fischer There is some support for Israeli central bank chief Stanley Fischer

This man was not the only one who thought the Europeans had weakened their case for keeping control of the top job by seeming presumptuous. (Let's face it, by BEING presumptuous.)

The rest of the world would have to overwhelmingly agree on a competing candidate for someone else to have any chance of beating Lagarde. Will that happen? At this point, the chances seem very slight. Candidates such as Agostin Carstens, the Mexican central banker, have a lot of supporters, but no-one so far looks like gaining a lot of momentum.

But they can dream, and more than one I spoke to was dreaming of Stan Fischer, the former deputy managing director, who is now head of the Israeli central bank.

The way the fantasy plays out, there would be a major fight in the board over the decision, with Fischer then emerging at the last minute as the compromise candidate to break the deadlock.

Stan Fischer would be an extremely good choice: born and raised in Africa, he has friends across the developing world and, as a distinguished economist, he's both liked and respected within the Fund. He'd also be good at banging European heads together.

Unfortunately, the fantasy has little chance of coming true, not least because he has been a US citizen for much of his working life.

If he came in as number one at the Fund, the Americans would lose not just the number two slot at the Fund, currently taken by John Lipsky, but the job of running the World Bank as well.

The Americans like Stan Fischer a lot, but not enough to give up two senior posts in the international financial system in exchange for just one.

Which leaves us back where we started, with Lagarde as the likely next head of the IMF.

But if she does come in there will be a lot of bad blood around, which the Europeans may come to regret. If you think of the parts of the world that are most likely to need international goodwill in the next year or two, Europe would surely come quite high up the list.

 
Stephanie Flanders, Economics editor Article written by Stephanie Flanders Stephanie Flanders Former economics editor

So it's goodbye from me

After 11 years at the BBC, I'm leaving for a new role in the City.

Read full article

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 139.

    The IMF and its history, methodology, and ultimate goals would make a prime and timely subject for investigative journalism
    You or Robert could have a best selling book - look where it has been, look what it has done, look what it is doing that is not yet known..
    I cannot see that happening here, BBC does not do depth it seems

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 138.

    136 "Look deeper =one will always find inherent contradictions in assuming that the economic system was/is actually capitalism!"

    That same excuse socialists and communists often give when their systems fail.It wasn't the real deal. Another variant is the people who implimented it were no good or they were corrupt or.....Of course they were corrupt but it wouldn't have mattered, it was the idea.

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 137.

    134. SirLoinsaaalot
    132.

    The BBC plan for HYS -to create a perfect 'brainstorming' forum for the generation of 'innovative' + original T-Shirt slogans. I hear many of the editors already have share holdings, + exclusive copyright with the company that will be producing the merchandise for international sale + distribution - even the Culture Minister is in on the act! We are all in it together!

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 136.

    135. MarcusAureliusII

    "Laissez-Faire capitalism as applied to the US economy in the 1920s refers to unregulated industry."
    That really depends on which books you tend to digest! 'Laissez-Faire' economic policy does not necessarily imply economic reality was capitalism. Look deeper =one will always find inherent contradictions in assuming that the economic system was/is actually capitalism!

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 135.

    Laissez-Faire capitalism as applied to the US economy in the 1920s refers to unregulated industry.Consequences for the financial sector were devastating.Not only were absurd risks temporarily highly profitable, fraud on a massive scale was enabled.This is what deregulation in the 1980s and 1990s returned America to.Seeing those profits, Europeans copied what US bankers were doing.What a mistake

 

Comments 5 of 139

 

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.