Libyan assets held by leading global banks
The EU and UN have frozen assets of the Libyan leader Col Gaddafi and members of his family
Some of the biggest and best-known financial institutions in the world held billions of dollars of Libyan state funds, a leaked report has revealed.
Principal among them were HSBC, Royal Bank of Scotland, Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan Chase, Nomura and Societe General, Global Witness said.
The banks refused to say whether they held, or are still holding, the funds.
All the assets have now been frozen by the European Union and United Nations.
The document, dated June 2010, showed that HSBC held $292.7m (£179.9m) in 10 cash accounts, with a similar amount invested in a hedge fund, while Goldman Sachs had $43m in three accounts.
Almost $4bn was held in investment funds and structured products, with Societe General alone holding $1bn.
“Start Quote
End QuoteAll the banks refused to make any public comment on the funds they received and managed on behalf of the Libyan Investment Authority, citing client confidentiality”
Japanese bank Nomura and Bank of New York also held $500m each.
A much larger proportion of Libyan Investment Authority's assets - $19bn in total - were held by Libyan and Middle Eastern Banks, the document revealed.
It also showed that the Libyan Investment Authority (LIA) holds billions of dollars in shares in global corporations such as General Electric, BP, Vivendi and Deutsche Telekom.
It had already been widely reported that the fund held stakes in UK publishing group Pearson, Italy's Unicredit bank and industrial group Finmeccanica, as well as Canadian oil exploration group Verenex.
'Economic sanctions'"It is completely absurd that HSBC and Goldman Sachs can hide behind customer confidentiality in a case like this," said Charmian Gooch, director of campaigning group Global Witness.
LIA funds held by banks
Libyan Investment Authority - Management Information Report[378KB]
Most computers will open PDF documents automatically, but you may need Adobe Reader
"These are state accounts, so the customer is effectively the Libyan people and these banks are withholding vital information from them."
Established in 2006, the LIA holds about $70bn of assets and is the 13th largest sovereign wealth fund in the world, according to the Sovereign Wealth Fund Institute.
The fund, built on Libya's oil wealth, scores two out of 10 on the institute's transparency ranking.
Earlier this month, the EU extended its economic sanctions against Libya to include the LIA and the country's central bank.
It had already frozen assets of Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi and some members of his family.
~RS~q~RS~~RS~z~RS~23~RS~)



Global markets fall on growth fears
Cameron: We won't give in to terror
Believe it or not
Coffee 'overdose'
Building site
Page turner
A novel idea?
Comment number 68.
BeachyHed26th May 2011 - 19:36
There should be no surprise that banks are holding Libyan state funds as up until a few months ago Libya was deemed to be a reformed state. That money wills still belong to Libya when Gaddafi is removed from power.
Link to this (Comment number 68)
Comment number 67.
stevie26th May 2011 - 19:30
Maybe we should give this back to the Libyan people instead of giving them a cut of the £110M announced today to encourage democracy.
Link to this (Comment number 67)
Comment number 27.
Megan26th May 2011 - 10:24
The money is clearly the property of the citizens of Libya. Once THEY have decided how they wish to administer their country it must be returned to them so that they may use it to their benefit.
Politicians in other nations who do not understand that they have access to public money ONLY in trust on behalf of their citizens may have difficulty understanding this, however.
Link to this (Comment number 27)
Comment number 19.
matt-stone26th May 2011 - 8:06
Another project Gaddafi had in place was to irrigate their desert areas and re-vegetate them with trees and plants. Apparently the desalination projects have now been suspended. Will Britain and American do all these after Gaddafi has gone?? We shall see.
Link to this (Comment number 19)
Comment number 14.
Removed26th May 2011 - 7:00
All this user's posts have been removed.Why?
Link to this (Comment number 14)
Comments 5 of 7