Will Northern Rock be re-mutualised?

Northern Rock branch Northern Rock was nationalised in 2008

Those arguing for Northern Rock to be returned to the mutual sector as a born-again building society - and there are many of those in Parliament, from all parties - will feel their case is reinforced by today's results from the biggest building society, Nationwide.

Nationwide's underlying profits were up 30% to £276m.

Its charge for mis-selling PPI credit insurance is a pimple at £16m compared with the grotesque carbuncle of the billions of pounds the banks will have to pay in PPI compensation.

And Nationwide's balance sheet, on paper at least, is stronger than that of any of the big banks, with loss-absorbing core capital equivalent to 12.5% of risk-weighted assets, 2.5 percentage points higher than the banks' capital ratios.

There has also been a significant shift in attitude towards the mutualisation of the Rock at HM Treasury.

Just a few months ago, the Treasury was telling me, in no uncertain terms, that what mattered most was that the taxpayer should receive the maximum possible financial return from the eventual privatisation of the Rock. And that mutualising the Rock flunked that test.

They said (and I paraphrase here) that returning the Rock to its building society roots was a lovely idea for sandal-wearing, vegan, financial hippies. But at the Treasury, where they dine on the raw red meat of harsh financial reality, they were under no illusion that the only realistic option for the Rock was for it to be sold to a proper bank or financial investor.

That's not what the Treasury is saying now - probably because ministers have discovered that those sandal-wearing, vegan, financial hippies throng the backbenches of their parties (even the Tory party) and seem to be bossing around even the influential Treasury Select Committee.

So there is a lot of work going on to evaluate whether the revealed desire of the Coventry Building Society or the Yorkshire Building Society to buy the Rock could be made to work. And my strong sense is that the Chancellor, George Osborne, is prepared to bend over backwards to facilitate the transfer of the Rock to one of these.

Which, before you get too excited, doesn't mean that it will actually happen. Because it is still not clear how building societies that - by definition - can't raise equity capital from investors are going to finance the takeover.

There has been a vast amount of talk - for as long as I can remember - about creating a financial instrument (so-called mutual paper) that would serve as a proxy for equity capital for building societies and that could be sold to investment institutions or even retail investors. The problem is that even if the regulatory obstacles could be cleared, the finance raised in that way would almost certainly be prohibitively expensive for societies.

So I remain slightly sceptical that - even with the goodwill of the Treasury - a way will be found to remutualise the Rock.

I also note, in passing, that the Independent Commission on Banking pointed out in its interim report that, if the Treasury wants to make its top priority the creation of a new bank to challenge the market dominance of the Big Five banks, then it could do worse than crunch the Rock together with the banking assets called Verde being sold by Lloyds (see my note of yesterday for more on this).

Merging the Rock with Verde would help to solve Verde's significant funding problem - in that Verde has more loans than deposits, and the Rock has more deposits than loans. And the enlarged Verde-Rock would begin to look large enough to look like a credible retail competitor to HSBC, Santander, RBS, Barclays and (even perhaps) Lloyds itself.

Robert Peston, economics editor Article written by Robert Peston Robert Peston Economics editor

Farewell to the mother of all depressions

What kind of economic recovery has the UK been enjoying, and can it last?

Read full article

More on This Story

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 44.

    If Nationwide are doing so well why isn't anyone talking about the huge amount of money being flushed down the toilet on the Voyager project, which is years late and has been descoped so much that it wont be replacing the legacy banking engine it was designed to?

  • rate this

    Comment number 43.

    I'd love to make a sensible comment regarding how allowing the changing of Building Societies into Banks en masse contributed to at least half the problems in the current finaincial markets, but at 400 characters that is a literal impossibility.

    Shame really.

    Nation shall make shallow sound bites unto nation.

  • rate this

    Comment number 42.

    Could someone explain please how the re-mutualisation process might work? Would, say Northern Rock, be given to the people who happen to have deposits in certain accounts and mortgages i.e. the equivalent of the members before it was de-mutualised? Or do people actually mean that it should be run as a nationalised industry i.e. owned by the state?

  • rate this

    Comment number 41.

    #22 credit unions are covered by NCUA. 48 out of about 20,000 received TARP funds varying from $7000 to about $7000000.

  • rate this

    Comment number 40.

    It was those 'red meat' eaters that got us where we are today. Of course Northern Rock should be re-mutualised and the Halifax with it, even if it takes all the bankers bonuses to do it.
    This format? This is what you get when you have something designed by unpaid interns. I can't imagine a proper designer doing this.


Comments 5 of 44



BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.