Amanda Knox murder conviction spurs debate on Italian justice

 

Amanda Knox told ABC she would not willingly go back to Italy

On Thursday an Italian appeals court found American exchange student Amanda Knox and her former boyfriend, Raffaele Sollecito, guilty of the murder of British student Meredith Kercher.

The battle lines in the debate over Knox's guilt have long since been drawn, and the latest news has commentators once again returning to the ramparts.

The judicial saga began in 2009, when the pair were convicted of killing Kercher. After the decision was overturned in 2011 due to lack of evidence, Italy's Supreme Court got involved, saying in March 2013 that the jury hadn't considered all of the information and had ignored discrepancies in Knox's and Sollecito's testimonies.

Sollecito was recently discovered in a hotel near the Austrian border and is now in Italian custody. For Knox, who returned to the US when her original conviction was overturned, the latest decision could mean extradition to an Italian prison if the conviction is upheld.

Some American commentators write that the US shouldn't put Ms Knox's fate back in the hands of the Italian legal system.

Joe Coscarelli of New York magazine calls Italian law "totally insane", as it allows a suspect to be tried multiple times for the same crime - a "double jeopardy" that is constitutionally prohibited in US law. He writes that Knox is "the poster child for not studying abroad".

Start Quote

Has American arrogance ever been so bold?”

End Quote Andrea Vogt The Week UK

The Atlantic's Olga Khazan labels the case "an illogical, clumsy disaster" that reflects poorly on Italian justice.

"Judicial appointments in Italy are made through nepotism, juries aren't properly sequestered, and the courts are in dire need of reform," she writes. "Prosecutors may have been right to pursue the case until they're fully satisfied, but the bizarre, never-ending saga that Knox's case has become detracts from the legitimacy of the final verdict."

The Week UK's Andrea Vogt counters that American media are turning the murder of Kercher into "some sort of twisted reality show, not a heinous crime being tried in a serious European court of law".

"Frankly, it makes a mockery of the Italian magistrates who professionally managed this appeal, and who regularly risk their lives prosecuting the mafia in that very same courtroom," she writes. "Has American arrogance ever been so bold? Have the western media ever been so complicit in such an orchestrated public relations sham?"

Assuming Italy's highest court upholds the appeals court's decision, attention will turn to whether the US will extradite Knox if asked by Italian officials. According to Harvard Law Prof Alan Dershowitz, that's more likely than many in the US media may think.

"As popular as she is here and as pretty as she is here - because that's what this is all about, if she was not an attractive woman we wouldn't have the group love-in - she will be extradited if it's upheld," he tells Mira Oberman of Agence France Presse.

The Guardian's Nick Richardson advises that as the case proceeds, everyone should take a look at their opinions and see if they are based in reality and not on biases and cultural stereotypes.

"We should be cautious in our aspersions or feelings about the verdict, lest they say more about us than they do about the case; and if we do feel strongly one way or the other, we'd do well to ask ourselves if something besides evidence has a hand in our opinion," he writes.

If the case turns into an extradition battle between the US and Italian governments, however, such cool circumspection doesn't seem very likely.

 

More on This Story

Kercher verdict

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 254.

    @251
    what level in Karate did she reach, how long did she train for?
    I have a black belt in Karate and can tell you that even then one has just become a 'fully qualified beginner'. Having trained in Karate does not mean at all that you can defend yourself. It's not like in Kung Fu movies, in order to defend yourself using Karate in situations of stress and panic you must be highly trained.

  • Comment number 253.

    This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 252.

    @55: In the UK, The Double Jeopardy rule is abrogated ONLY if compelling new evidence emerges. That is what happened with the two men convicted of the Stephen Lawrence murder. It is definitely not the same situation as in Italy, where the prosecution can appeal just because it doesn't agree with an acquittal.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 251.

    Reading the transcripts from court there are interesting aspects we don't find much reported in the media, such as RG cannot have acted alone due to the multitude of injuries and MKs ability to defend herself (Karate). I simply believe there is not enough evidence to convict, but also no enough counter evidence to declare AK and RS Innocent. Scottish law has an interesting opt out via "Not proven"

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 250.

    @248
    the verdicts justification will make an interesting read. While we cannot know all the facts I completely agree with comment 237.
    I

 

Comments 5 of 254

 

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.