No plan yet for the eurozone

 
Angela Merkel The German government is not backing the eurobonds proposal

The panicked mood over Greece has increased the pressure on eurozone leaders, and inspired feverish talk of grand plans that might or might not be unveiled at the EU Summit at the end of this month - "if only Germany would agree".

After spending yesterday in Berlin, I can tell you the German government is mightily fed up with all this speculation - and fed up with getting blamed for everything bad happening in the global economy (last week's cover of the Economist, for example).

I interviewed the Deputy Finance Minister - Secretary of State Steffen Kampeter - after the German chancellor's strident speech to the Reichstag.

He made clear that on one major point - eurobonds - the speculation about what Germany might be willing to accept in time for the summit was simply wrong.

People had hoped that a watered-down, temporary version of common eurozone debt, dreamed up by Germany's so-called "wise men" group of economic experts, might be a runner for the summit.

The fact that the scheme would be strictly time limited, and involve only a portion of each country's debt, was more likely to make it legal in the eyes of Germany's constitutional court.

Mr Kampeter told me they had looked at the plan, and discussed it with their coalition partners and it wasn't going to work. It wasn't constitutional. End of.

'Credible commitment'

There are a few other clever eurobond plans out there (if you're interested, Breaking Views has a useful potted summary). It's still possible that Chancellor Merkel will manage to sign up to one of them, eventually.

But for now, at least, her speech didn't seem to leave a lot of wiggle room: she said the mutual debt schemes were both "unconstitutional" and "counterproductive".

It's tempting to see this as a cue for another round of Germany-bashing. We're surely going to see some of that on Monday, at the G20 Leaders' Summit.

But it's worth noting that even the Americans have this week softened their public rhetoric around Germany. Yesterday the US Treasury Secretary said it was "unfair to see Germany as the sole source of the problem". He, too, recognises that pushing Germany too hard could be self-defeating.

But there is a better reason for people to hold off criticising Chancellor Merkel: she is right.

Solving this crisis will ultimately depend on governments making a credible commitment to closer economic integration - credible because their people accept it.

Lest we forget, Mrs Merkel and her German colleagues are actually much more devoted to that long-term objective of integration than many of those now calling for rapid steps towards it.

In the view of German officials, their key eurozone partners are now so terrified by the crisis, they'd sign up to anything that might make it go away - long-term consequences be damned.

If you are Mrs Merkel, consequences matter. And so does process.

The temporary eurobond scheme is a case in point. It couldn't, in fact, be implemented quickly. Or neatly.

And since the mutualised debt would have to become a national responsibility again after 25 years, it might actually make the long-term mutualisation of eurozone debt harder to achieve.

The German chancellor is right that you're not very likely to reach a credible form of closer integration by lurching for the latest clever scheme from the academic think tanks, every time Spanish bond yields go up.

But her critics may well also be right, that the gravity of the situation demands a dramatic step forward, right now. That is what has made this crisis so scary from day one.

 
Stephanie Flanders Article written by Stephanie Flanders Stephanie Flanders Former economics editor

So it's goodbye from me

After 11 years at the BBC, I'm leaving for a new role in the City.

Read full article

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 123.

    @120
    I find Angelas
    "It is extremely important that tomorrow's Greek elections lead to a result in which those who form the government say, 'Yes, we want to keep to our commitments."

    to be quite bizarre, to interfere in the election of another country in such way goes way beyond what is acceptable

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 122.

    Political & fiscal union into a new EeZeeLand? Easily said (or written), but how would it be achieved?

    & when it is in place, will Greece become more like the Netherlands? The Rolling Stones can incorporate there to pay 10 % tax in Athens? Or Munich German Doctors can reduce their declared incomes to 20k pa like those in Naples?

    & There'll be incentives to join EZLand, EeZeeLoans for EeZeeDebts?

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 121.

    More likely there will be no major power to manage the world or wants to. Now if you are into nightmares try that one.

  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 120.

    I thought Merkel's final piece of advice to Greek voters was a bit rich. She advised then to honour the commitments they had made. Perhaps she might wish to revisit the cart and horses that Germany drove thro' the commitments they made to fiscal prudence within the Eurozone when it suited them. One rule for the rich - one for the poor.

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 119.

    I suppose the blogs may centre around the loss of the USA as the Worlds No 1 power and the new Super Power, China

 

Comments 5 of 123

 

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.