Lord Tebbit urges caution on strike laws

 
Lord Tebbit Tebbit would prepare legislation to deal with strike 'mischief' instead of a minimum turnout requirement.

It's decision time on strikes. Should our local school, the train we take to work, even the local JobCentre, be closed by strikes which don't have the majority of workers backing them.

Only 40% of members of the NUT voted in the ballot which will see many schools closed down. London's tube network has been brought to a standstill after just a third of RMT members voted to strike.

So pressure is growing on the government - from the Mayor of London to business leaders - for a new law requiring at least half of members to vote yes or a minimum turnout before strikes can go ahead.

Intriguingly Lord Tebbit, the former Employment Secretary who was largely responsible for the current laws, urges caution on tonight's edition of Decision Time - the programme which examines how decisions are taken in Whitehall and Westminster.

I ask him what his reaction would be to the idea of a new law if he was back in his old job:

"My first reaction is caution. We've had an employment law structure which has worked for the last 30 years, which transformed industrial relations in this country. It was based on the idea that the baddies were not the guys on the shop floor; the baddies were the big trade union leaders, which was the complete reverse of conventional thinking at the time. And that has worked, so I would say hold hard just a little, make sure that we have got public support, that the public see there is a real problem and that they want something done about it, and so do some of the union members."

Norman Tebbit: "I would say hold hard just a little, make sure we've got public support... and they want something done about it."

Is that, though, a wily old political fox inviting the unions to step into what Ed Balls calls "a trap" set for them by the Tories? Tebbit certainly suggests that ministers should be getting ready.

"If I was back as Secretary of State I would be getting my people to prepare legislation to deal with the mischief if the mischief arrives."

With union leaders warning of the biggest wave of strikes since the General Strike of 1926, Norman Tebbit expresses his concern that this government does not look as robust as the one led by the Lady who was "not for turning".

"Everybody had to be sure that the government was not going to run away from the conflict if conflict there came. Nobody thought Mrs Thatcher was going to run away. She didn't do u-turns, as you may famously remember, so we've got to establish that in everybody's mind."

I ask him if he thinks there's a doubt about whether the current Prime Minister might run away in the face of confrontation.

"I wouldn't dream of suggesting it, but of course there have been pauses and reflections, and he has the problem that he is saddled with Mr Clegg and the Liberals, and if the Liberals had another bad round of local election results next year, they would want to run away on something else."

Is he saying that the gentleman is for turning?

"I don't know. I wait to see."

Also on tonight's programme are the former GMB leader, John Edmonds, former civil servant who dealt with employment relations Helen Leizer and Dominic Raab, the Tory backbencher who has proposed a change in the law.

Decision Time is on BBC Radio 4 tonight at 2000 BST and can be heard after that time online.

 
Nick Robinson Article written by Nick Robinson Nick Robinson Political editor

Debates - on or off?

David Cameron says he wants to take part in TV election debates and that he thinks a deal can be done but he's also setting new conditions for taking part.

Read full article

More on This Story

More from Nick

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 136.

    116#

    Like what? "I resign?" Unfortunately for them, if they do that ,there are plenty of willing imigrants to take their place and not give a monkeys about pensions. You lot dont realise when you're on a good thing.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 135.

    Lets face it, the tories and the CBI don't like unions and the public sector. As far as they're concerned if you can't make a profit as cheaply as possible on the backs of others then it's an anathema. Tip for anyone forced to go for a job you don't want in the private sector, ask your prospective employer if they're union friendly. Letter of rejection pretty much guaranteed.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 134.

    ... and you do not have universal public support. PD is right, heck even Blinky Balls is right in this case. The political ambitions of the union leaders are seeing them race headlong into a trap. Too busy ranting and dogwhistling and shroudwaving to think. More fool them. Not to mention councils like Manchester cutting front line services to protect "Pilgrims"...

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 133.

    Saga:

    No howlers. Thats the score. 97 is a known fact. It should have been dealt with years ago. Even Thatch kicked it into the long grass. Both sides have been and remain guilty of political short-termism. That statement is perfectly accurate. It needs to be sorted out. Sorry, but your perpetual money tree only exists in your fevered imagination. And 92 is accurate. No howler.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 132.

    102#
    So, why are the unions getting so mad about things that dont directly affect their current or past membership? After all, the private sector pensioners who were ripped off by Brown and Robinson in 1997 didnt get the same level of support from the union barons, did they? Save your mealy mouthed faux foaming outrage for those with an IQ lower than their shoe size, boys. Its all just noise.

 

Comments 5 of 136

 

Features

Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.