Taliban rule out negotiations with Nato

Soldiers in Helmand province June has been the deadliest month for Nato forces so far

The Taliban in Afghanistan have told the BBC that there is no question of their entering into any kind of negotiations with Nato forces.

It comes after US commanders and the British army chief of staff, Gen David Richards, suggested that it might be useful to talk to the Taliban.

The Taliban statement is uncompromising, almost contemptuous.

They believe they are winning the war, and cannot see why they should help Nato by talking to them.

They assume, perhaps wrongly, that the Americans are in disarray after the sacking of the Nato commander Gen Stanley McChrystal last week, and regard any suggestion that they should enter negotiations with them as a sign of Nato's own weakness.

June, they point out, has seen the highest number of Nato deaths in Afghanistan: 102, an average of more than three a day.

'Differences'

Nowadays it is extremely hard for Westerners to meet Taliban leaders face to face, either in Afghanistan or in Pakistan.

Start Quote

Why should we talk if we have the upper hand, and the foreign troops are considering withdrawal, and there are differences in the ranks of our enemies?”

End Quote Zabiullah Mujahedd Taliban spokesman

But a trusted intermediary conveyed a series of questions to Zabiullah Mujahid, the acknowledged spokesman for the Afghan Taliban leadership, and gave us his answers.

The text runs as follows:

"We do not want to talk to anyone - not to [President Hamid] Karzai, nor to any foreigners - till the foreign forces withdraw from Afghanistan.

"We are certain that we are winning. Why should we talk if we have the upper hand, and the foreign troops are considering withdrawal, and there are differences in the ranks of our enemies?"

This is propaganda, of course - yet many Afghans, even those who hate and fear the Taliban, are coming round to exactly the same view.

The Taliban are still deeply unpopular in many parts of the country.

Memories are still vivid of the brutal and extreme way they governed from 1996 to 2001.

They, together with their supporters, certainly do not represent anything near a majority of the Afghan people.

'Instinctive dislike'

They are still predominantly a Pashtun faction, and when they were in power they caused much anger by imposing Pashtun cultural norms on the complex and varied peoples of Afghanistan.

Nevertheless, there is an instinctive and widespread dislike of having foreign troops, and especially non-Muslim ones, based in Afghanistan.

Village elders sit before the start of a shura meeting with local Afghan government officials and officers from the US Many Afghans do not support the Taliban

People who do not support the Taliban know that the Nato-led force is preventing the Taliban from returning to power.

But the dislike of occupying forces goes very deep.

The key to the Taliban's remarkable success in capturing Kabul from the more moderate mujahideen leadership in 1996 was their ability to convince dozens of uncommitted warlords that they were bound to win.

Many of these warlords were not themselves Pashtun, and often were not extreme Muslims.

They joined the Taliban simply to be on the winning side.

The Taliban have not forgotten this. If they can convince people that they are beating the British and Americans, more and more local warlords will join their cause.

Petraeus' challenge

The difficult job facing Gen Petraeus, who takes over control of the Nato forces in Afghanistan, will be to change this perception.

When he was in charge of coalition forces in Iraq he managed to change the widespread perception that the war there was unwinnable.

He presented the draw-down of US forces as a victory: they had, he said, done the job they had come to do, and succeeded. Therefore they could leave Iraq as victors.

Gen David Petraeus, commander of US forces in Afghanistan Gen Petraeus has warned of an escalation of violence

Cynics may point out that the number of deaths from terrorism in Iraq is still appallingly high, and that the fragile Iraqi government is struggling to do anything about it.

But since most American news organisations have pulled out of Baghdad, little news of what is happening in Iraq seeps through to the United States.

Gen Petraeus will no doubt try to replicate his remarkable Iraqi success in Afghanistan.

Yet it will be harder, and doubts about the value of the operation are already growing in every Nato country.

His main aim will be to reverse the growing belief in Afghanistan that the Americans, the British and the others will pull out soon, and leave the country to fight out its own war - with the Taliban the likely winners.

It is likely to be the hardest fight of his career.

More on This Story

FROM OTHER NEWS SITES
Reuters UK Petraeus arrives to lead faltering Afghan war - 1 hr ago
NPR Petraeus Faces Unfinished Projects, Fragile Progress - 15 hrs ago
The EconomistPakistan's role in Afghanistan: Ganging up on India - 18 hrs ago
Scottish Sun Hague hints at 2014 Afghan exit 16:42 - 20 hrs ago
Radio Free Europe Petraeus Vows No Change In Afghan Rules Of Engagement - 20 hrs ago
* May require registration or subscription

More South Asia stories

RSS

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.