1. BBC Music
  2. Reviews
  3. Humbug

Arctic Monkeys Humbug Review

Album. Released 24 August 2009. Discography information comes from MusicBrainz. You can add or edit information about Humbug at musicbrainz.org.

BBC Review

Incorporating elements of rock‘n’roll's past it's still a very modern affair.

Mike Diver 2009-08-13

Put aside all thoughts of imminent backlash immediately, as Humbug is Arctic Monkeys’ most enjoyably complete album to date.

Recorded in part with Queens of the Stone Age’s Josh Homme in the Californian desert, while it lacks the hook-laden immediacy of previous collections, Humbug embraces the true nature of album-craft by sequencing ten tracks in such a way that coherence and consistency bind constituent pieces into a single, enjoyably sombre whole.

Melancholic overtones permeate even the brightest Alex Turner lyricism. His voice is heavier than before, confident that songs about popping down the local corner shop and asking a girl out aren’t guaranteed to maintain the group’s success. A wise move, especially as said approach has been reduced to cliché by pale imitators.

Homme’s presence is felt in the solid, rugged mix, yet stoner vibes are conspicuous by their absence, nary a waft of weed smoke manifesting itself aurally. As for the reported Hendrix and Cream influences: while the band is indulging in a depth of sound previously unplumbed, songs remain loaded with a mischievous, at times malevolent energy.

Penultimate track Pretty Visitors is particularly unsettling: “What came first, the chicken or the d*******?” spits Turner, as Circus of Horrors organs are split asunder by some truly tumultuous drumming from Matt Helders. It’s one of many indicators on Humbug that Arctic Monkeys are actively moving away from the sound that launched a hundred would-be acts in their wake. Kitchen-sink poetry’s replaced by rampant analogies, characters of the everyday transformed into otherworldly denizens with wicked intentions.

Turner still spills syllables rather too swiftly at times – Secret Door would benefit from a little lexical restraint – but largely a slow-and-steady approach prevails, mirrored by the music’s assured shuffle. Fire and the Thud is a good example of the band’s sprightly past tempered by their present penchant for laid-back, blues-touched riffs. Lead single Crying Lightning also showcases a newfound swagger – less raw-knuckled front, more funk-kissed fuzz-bass serving as the backbone for some delightful fret wandering. 

If there’s one fact to be presented through all this subjectivity, it’s that Arctic Monkeys have grown up: here, they incorporate elements of rock‘n’roll past to fuel a very modern affair, and that it manages to sound completely unique is testament indeed to Turner and company’s cultivated creative nous.

Creative Commons Licence This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Licence. If you choose to use this review on your site please link back to this page.

Comments

You need to sign in to contribute to this page. If you haven't registered to leave comments, creating your membership is quick and easy.

    • 1. At 4:44pm on 18 Aug 2009, phil2992 wrote:

      Spot on review. Class album from the Arctics with an awesome new sound.
      I'd give this album 8/10, which will probably rise to 8.5 or 9 if they play it well live at Reading!

      Complain about this comment

    • 2. At 10:38am on 24 Aug 2009, a12tfp wrote:

      They have the most dreadful album covers.
      The last one showed half-wit cigarettes all over the place.
      This one looks equally uninspiring and whilst it's a lille mid-60's Pink Floyd-esque, it's once again masking poor design and lacking in originality.

      Complain about this comment

    • 3. At 10:18am on 25 Aug 2009, always_skiving wrote:

      I think this album is fantastic, think Josh Homme has had a very good influence on the boys. If you need comformation how good this album is look at this review as well http://www.the-fly.co.uk/?content=24&articleid=5735&news_search_txt=humbug its a must buy in my eyes for fans and non fans alike

      Complain about this comment

    • 4. At 3:42pm on 26 Aug 2009, Mick_Stagger wrote:

      I wouldn't rely on what The Fly has to say. They have absoluetly no critical facilities or insight and everything's groovy in their indietastic universe.

      Complain about this comment

    • 5. At 08:38am on 02 Sep 2009, MrHallwood wrote:

      I agree the artwork is a bit lame.. but the album is superb. definately a grower. I saw these at Reading last weekend and to be fair as much as people complained they didn't play old ones like Mardy Bum and Fake tales.. I'd much prefer to hear this.

      It does sound a bit like Hendrix as mentioned above, On the train this morning I was listening to Wind cries mary and 3rd stone from the sun, then on my walk to work I put this on and didn't really notice the change over.

      Good review and quite fair.. "incorporate elements of rock‘n’roll past to fuel a very modern affair".. well said.

      Complain about this comment

      View these comments in RSS

      Explore the BBC

      This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.