BBC College of Journalism Blog - A vigorous and robust discussion about journalism from every perspective.

- Charles Miller |
- Wednesday 11 May 2011, 15:37
Video of the second session, 'Editorial Issues', from day two of #bbcsms:
'Editorial Issues': Report from the second session on day two of #bbcsms:
NPR journalist Andy Carvin describes his own style of journalism using social media in an interview for the BBC's Social Media Summit.
In it, he assesses the value of monitoring and passing on a huge number of links and stories from his Washington office - and its limitations.
Carvin doesn't claim his kind of work should be used instead of journalists working in the field. "You still need networks of sources," he says, "and those correspondent instincts."
But when field reporters in Tripoli were unable to move around the city freely, he said he could help them with information he'd gleaned online remotely.
A discussion at the #bbcsms session included criticism of Carvin's work for passing on rumours and "adding fuel to the fire", and that his work wasn't as speedy as some claimed: "It's not in real time."
Original blog post introducing second session on day two of #bbcsms:
In the States, NPR's Andy Carvin has created his own style of journalism as a kind of super-tweeter. According to the Washington Post, his output offers "a dizzying, non-stop ride across the geopolitical landscape, 140 characters at a time".
Carvin has been known to tweet 1,600 messages in less than 24 hours, gathering material -for instance, on Middle East revolutions - from the relative comfort of his NPR cubicle in Washington.
This kind of remote reporting - somehow both authoritative and second-hand - raises new editorial questions which will be discussed in the second session of the BBC Social Media Summit which includes a special filmed interview with him.
Carvin's work is just one example of new editorial issues created by social media.
There are also emerging, urgent questions about: social media and defamation; impartiality in the context of so much information about individual journalists being so easily available; and the criteria journalists should use to verify social media content.
Please contribute your thoughts, ideas and experiences in Comments below, and we'll feed them into the debate on Friday. What practical changes should we be focussing on?
Details of the Summit and confirmed guests here; list of attendees here.
- Post categories:
- Internet
Recent Posts
- A tale of three cities - and three media eras
- Future media challenges are about finding compasses not maps
- How about a newspaper that lets the readers broadcast back?
- College of Journalism Innovation Award winner announced
- How journalism gave a voice to indigenous communities
- A vision of the future media world coming to your locality
- Living inside and outside the social media bubble at the same time
- Why community journalism matters more than ever
- Social media is no excuse for different standards of journalism
- The way forward for open journalism
- By the community for the community: a new platform for community news
- Walking the local TV tightrope
- Politics, technology and the media - they're all pointing to the local
- The coming TV revolution - or Tomorrow's World revisited
- Innovation Award - shortlist announced
- Maintaining OpSec in the age of Twitter
- Our blog reunites a cameraman and his subject
- When one man spotted what all news media missed
- How free will Russia's new public service TV channel be?
- Journalism innovation award: last chance to enter





Comments
Sign in or register to comment.
Where our personal and professional lives begin and end online is an increasing concern - it's one of the first questions journalists ask me when I'm introducing them to using Twitter and Facebook in their work. Clarity and guidance in this area would be great. On-screen talent too need to be confident about how to deal with harassment or aggression.
Complain about this comment
Sometimes I think 'remote' reporting is just a way for upper management to rationalise even further the closing of bureaus around the world. Why have a bureau in the Middle East, when you can just go onto Twitter and get a somewhat 'verifiable' account of what is happening?
Something to consider/anticipate happening will be the linking of journalists (it's already happening as we all know)... eg: a journalist in Tehran friends a journo on Facebook, and thus a reporting partnership is formed, but what does this mean for the economics of the business? Who gets paid? Who does the 'blame' lie with if the reporting turns out to be false?
How should journalists treat what they learn on social media??? With a pinch of salt! Social media will not replace traditional research and investigative skills. Instead of looking at social media as the end-all and be-all of reporting, perhaps we need to use it and think of it as we would the police blotter... it's a good place to start, but you need to use your own reporting skills to go the distance!
Complain about this comment
View these comments in RSS