BBC College of Journalism Blog - A vigorous and robust discussion about journalism from every perspective.

- Julie Posetti |
- Tuesday 17 May 2011, 12:00
Social media is transforming professional journalism. And the speed of the real-time revolution raises significant challenges and opportunities for journalists and their publishers.
But it also necessitates a rigorous academic research agenda. The issues confronting journalism in the social media space include fundamental shifts in the practice of verification, the merger of private lives and professional practice, and the new journalistic role of community engagement.
These themes will be central to the BBC Social Media Summit (#bbcsms) organised in London this week by the BBC College of Journalism.
Social media training for journalists no longer discretionary
BBC Head of Global News Peter Horrocks said - way back - in February 2010 that social media practice for journalists was no longer discretionary. He was right. But this means that the professional training of journalists in social media theory and practice is also essential.
And fundamental to teaching and training journalists in this new form of 'social journalism' should be cutting-edge academic research; relevant to industry; in the field of journalism studies.
Setting a collaborative academic social media research agenda for journalism
One of the objectives of the BBC Social Media Summit will be to identify key areas for research in the field which can assist journalists and media organisations as they adapt to the challenges and opportunities of the social media age.
The process of charting a course for research into journalism and social media at #bbcsms will be collaborative - with researchers in the field (me included) seeking to co-ordinate an approach that draws on industry expertise and responds to needs identified by the journalists and editors in attendance.
Journalism research should be informed by journalistic practice and have a professionally relevant purpose. The Summit is committed to feeding back its research findings to the broader community for input; in keeping with social media ethos and the belief in practically applicable research.
'Twitterisation'
I'm writing a PhD on the 'Twitterisation' of journalism, exploring the transformative impact of journalistic engagement with the headline-stealing platform. My research has so far highlighted the effect of engagement with sources and Jay Rosen's 'people formerly known as audiences'; the way professional practice is being reshaped by escalating speed through real-time reporting; increased transparency achieved through reflective practice; and the conflation of private and professional lives.
As I've identified in the course of my research (some elements of which I've previously explored at Mediashift), there are many rich and important research questions emerging in the field - almost at the speed of tweets!
Key research themes
Here are some of my contributions to framing a social media research agenda for journalism:
Verification
- How is social media changing the practices and processes of verification?
- What new methods of verification are emerging? How effective are they?
- What is the impact of changing verification practices - including crowdsourcing verification - on accuracy in reporting and journalistic credibility?
- How do journalists experience the effects of these challenges, and what tools/guidance do they need to assist them?
- How do 'audiences' regard the shift in verification processes/standards, and how do these changes affect journalists' standing in their eyes?
Clash of the professional and private
- What is the impact of the clash/merger of journalists' personal/private lives and their professional/public lives on social media sites?
- Should journalists or their employers attempt to separate private/professional public communication, and what are the potential benefits and risks of such an approach?
- How do 'audiences' react to the blurring of personal/professional lives by journalists? What impact does it have on their view of journalists who use social media 'socially'? Are they more or less likely to collaborate with such journalists?
Engagement
- How do journalists' interactions with the 'people formerly known as audiences' impact on their research, reporting and commentary on issues (including framing, source selection, objectivity and verification)?
- How do these interactions affect journalists' perceptions of 'audiences' and citizenry?
- How do these interactions affect 'audiences'' perceptions of journalists and journalism?
- What is the correlation between engagement and building communities of interest around journalism/quality content?
- What 'rules of engagement' do journalists bring to social media interaction? With what success and effect?
Conflict and complaints
What are journalists' experiences of being confronted with criticism or complaints about their work from colleagues, competitors and audiences on social media sites?
- What views have media organisations formed about the role of individual journalists in complaints-handling via social media? What processes and guidelines are being or need to be developed?
- How are audiences responding? Are they choosing to 'go direct' to journalists? If so, why? And with what effect on their regard for the journalist, their work and the media organisation?
Industrial/logistical issues
What are the impacts on journalists' workload, productivity and wellbeing of 24/7 real-time social media practice and engagement?
- What systems and procedures are media employers putting in place to address the issues of workload, time management and risk associated with social media?
- What systems/procedures should be implemented to address the above?
- How can social media practice be best folded into convergent journalism practice and story-assignment procedures?
- What systems/processes/technologies are being employed in newsrooms to achieve the above?
Networking, professional development and globalisation
- Explore the role and impact of cross-cultural and trans-national communication via social media on journalists and their subjects
- Explore mentoring, networking and employment patterns among professional journalists through social media.
Rounds and beats
- Develop case studies of best practice approaches to social media strategies in reporting rounds such as health, education, courts, emergencies, politics
- Exploring the role of social media in public journalism projects.
Journalism education
- How should social media be incorporated into university and professional training courses?
- Measure outcomes/impacts of training
- How do student journalists - 'social journalism natives'? - best develop social media skills and learn to navigate/critique the ethical/professional issues arising?
Technology
Explore cross-disciplinary approaches to problem-solving, involving computer scientists, journalists/journalism researchers (et al) in the development of industry-applicable resources and programs applicable to aiding reporting via social media, measuring social media impacts, verification etc.
Platform-specific research - for example, how is Facebook changing journalism?
Legal/regulatory issues
- How are courts and governments around the world responding to the challenges posed to publishing laws presented by real-time 'masses' media'?
- How are journalistic standards and the professional and quasi-government organisations that monitor and regulate them adapting to the emergence of social media?
- Is it feasible to control or regulate social media, and what are the professional implications of doing so or not?
- Who owns a journalist's social media presence? The journalist? Their publisher/employer?
- How and why are journalists' unions and professional bodies around the world responding to these issues? With what effect?
- What are the implications for media freedom/freedom of expression of attempts to regulate the social web?
Research methodologies and practice
- Case studies
- Collaborative projects with journalists, industry and media consumers - 'Public Research'
- Detailed content analysis/critical discourse analysis
- Application of technology to the research process
- Commitment to transparent research processes and widespread dissemination
- Commitment to collaborating with industry in responding to findings - for example, through the development of targeted training and resources.
Share your ideas, help frame the research agenda and get involved
So, that's my contribution to framing the research discussion at #bbcsms.
What ideas would you like to throw into the mix? And what research approaches would you suggest?
There are two ways you can get involved:
1) You can contribute your ideas directly underneath this blog post (or others here), or
2) You can participate in the open conference remotely on Friday 20 May by contributing to the discussion curated under the #bbcsms hashtag.
We look forward to hearing your ideas and working together to chart the future of journalism research in the field of social media.
Julie Posetti is a journalist and journalism academic from Canberra, Australia. After a TV and radio career, with experience in politics, documentaries and social justice issues, she now teaches radio and television journalism at the University of Canberra.
- Post categories:
- Internet
Recent Posts
- A tale of three cities - and three media eras
- Future media challenges are about finding compasses not maps
- How about a newspaper that lets the readers broadcast back?
- College of Journalism Innovation Award winner announced
- How journalism gave a voice to indigenous communities
- A vision of the future media world coming to your locality
- Living inside and outside the social media bubble at the same time
- Why community journalism matters more than ever
- Social media is no excuse for different standards of journalism
- The way forward for open journalism
- By the community for the community: a new platform for community news
- Walking the local TV tightrope
- Politics, technology and the media - they're all pointing to the local
- The coming TV revolution - or Tomorrow's World revisited
- Innovation Award - shortlist announced
- Maintaining OpSec in the age of Twitter
- Our blog reunites a cameraman and his subject
- When one man spotted what all news media missed
- How free will Russia's new public service TV channel be?
- Journalism innovation award: last chance to enter





Comments
Sign in or register to comment.
Lots of good ideas for papers there.
I'm curious to find out more about what you mean by 'Twitterisation of journalism' - I think you need to be wary of aligning a Doctorate too closely to a specific technology and hope you are using 'twitterisation' generically as a proxy for real-time social media or somesuch.
Journalists and the MSM are hopelessly technology/media determinist in their outlook and need to prodded into stepping outside the media bubble and taking a more humanist and cultural point of view.
Complain about this comment
I'm really inspired by a lot of those research topics, Julie, but I share Andy Tedd's concerns about social media technology outpacing academic research. I'm just starting to think about possible journalism research and social media is a definite area of interest. But I'm very wary of any research looking archaic before I even start writing it up!
How do we avoid that?
Complain about this comment
As a journalist who has experience in the field of trying to produce for different media at the same time, my concern is quality and appropriateness for the medium. One approaches an interview for radio, print and television very differently. Add text in the form of a Twit or written radio news insert, and quality has to suffer. Management is sacrificing quality for quantity, and the result is falling circulation, listenership and viewers. There are broader ramifications: Decision-makers in business, politics or investment who rely at least in part on the media to keep them informed are being short-changed because in-depth analysis, reflection and debate are being sacrificed to the quick hit syndrome.
Complain about this comment
Although most BBC journalists now know how to use Twitter, there is still a reluctance to engage because of the fear of Tweeting nonsense. It is difficult to overcome the hurdle "what do I say". When I talk to other journalists in the newsroom the most common reason for not tweeting is "I have nothing to say that adds anything".
Journalists are reluctant to tweet opinions - because they don't want to be open to accusations of bias. Also, there is a reluctance to tweet any news stories we come across during our work because we want our outlet to break them first - and we are busy making sure whatever the news is on air.
Many correspondents covering stories do a great job tweeting latest developments. Producers aren't in that position - we've have all heard about the Tweets on eating a bacon sandwich for lunch, or hanging out the washing, or taking the dog for a walk - we don't want to feel we are just adding to the general noise of Twitter.
Complain about this comment
I'd like to respond to what Liz Hannaford mentioned about the timeliness of academics getting research out into the public sphere.
As a U.S.-journo-turned-academic, this has long been a personal pet peeve of mine! I research a topic (suicide) where my findings can have an immediate impact, yet it can take several years for the findings to be published in the traditional 'academic' way.
This is an issue that the academy needs to address, but, unfortunately, is not one likely to be discussed in the near future. Our response really can only be to turn to the technology that we research and use it to publish our findings. Currently, I work on a journal, http://www.suicidology-online.com/. It's peer reviewed, open-source and available to everyone, not just select universities and academics who happen to have a journal subscription.
Perhaps we academics need to contemplate this method of publishing to help research on social media stay current?
Complain about this comment
Research at Goldsmiths and elsewhere suggests that 'the audience' is not very keen on interacting. It lurks, and it links but it doesn't very often offer new (verifiable) information.
I found that very little material actually originated from social media (see Old Sources, New Bottles in New Media: Old News, Sage).
Twitter and Facebook are often used for adding a personal dimension to stories (much like vox pops)or for for getting a sense of what people are saying on a particular topic, but most 'news' still comes from the same places it always has done: from people whose bona fide can easily be verified. They may be Tweeting these days but they are sill the same people they were before.
Social media does have an important role to play but it is far more important for dissemination than it is for origination.
Complain about this comment
The social web is full of information for reporters and research departments to mine. Effective social media monitoring tools unlock that information.
In New Brunswick, Canada, reporters use Twitter to disseminate their observations of major news events, political scrums, etc. They also engage in friendly, casual conversation with their followers. Probably the most advantageous aspect of social media for reporters is the ability to continually cultivate sources and recieve information, even if it is on background, that can then undergo the process of confirmation. It makes the reporter more accessible.
On the research side of the coin the information contained in the social web is difficult to analyze without a proper tool (full disclousure: I work at Radian6). With any effective social media monitoring tool a research department or individual reporter can monitor public reaction to major news stories such as national and provincial elections, major court cases, and general attitudes towards things like politics, the economy, and cultural issues. There is debate and research underway that is examining the accuracy of this data but to date the results are positive.
This is a topic I have a particular passion for. Wish I could be at the event, I'll be following closely via #bbcsms.
Michael Girard,
Community Engagement, Radian6
Complain about this comment
Angela Phillips Goldsmiths wrote:
"Research at Goldsmiths and elsewhere suggests that 'the audience' is not very keen on interacting. It lurks, and it links but it doesn't very often offer new (verifiable) information."
The recent changes to the BBC News blog format cannot be the result of any serious research. These blogs were renowned for the in depth analysis and debate so were not as Angela suggests. Compare the threads on sites like http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thereporters/stephanieflanders/archives.html and http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thereporters/robertpeston/archives.html with the newer format at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/correspondents/stephanieflanders/ and http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/correspondents/robertpeston/
I don't think I need a researcher to point out that the debates on the older sites did indeed engage the audience who participated intelligently and did exchange information and ideas. The newer format has limited comments to 400 characters. This is far too short to allow any meaningful debate within the sites.
I also believe that short comments coupled with a rating system for them can only result in soundbite mudslinging and deliberate dogmatic point scoring.
See also http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2011/05/our_next_step_in_news_blogging.html#comments
I sincerely hope that some research will debate how the perceptions of what social media really are will persuade the mainstream providers (such as the BBC) that there is a place for extended comment.
How would I have made my point here if limited to 400 characters?
Complain about this comment
Thanks everyone for all these thoughtful comments and observations. We want to collaborate - in the spirit of social media - on academic research projects that help forge a social journalism future. I've set up a Facebook page to incubate collaborations between researchers, journalists, media outlets, and tech specialists.
You can find it here: http://www.facebook.com/Avaaz?sk=info#!/bbcsms
Please contribute, like & share!
Cheers
Complain about this comment
Hello Julie, I have a keen interest in Social Media and wondered if you have any information about how the event in May went. I am keen to connect with people who are doing research about Social Media. You can connect with me on Twitter @OfficeHounds or contact me via http://www.esocialmediacourses.com
I wish I'd stumbled upon this earlier. Interesting.
Maggie Langley
Director, That Social Media Thing Limited
Complain about this comment
View these comments in RSS