Kinemacolor versus Biocolour

'Charles Urban sued William Friese Greene's Biocolour company for infringement of patent...'
Charles Urban successfully marketed Kinemacolor and dominated the market with patents on the technology.
Urban sued William Friese Greene's Biocolour company for infringement of patent and litigation dragged on for three years. In 1913 Friese-Greene applied for Kinemacolor's patent to be revoked on the grounds of non-originality. The patent claimed that 'natural colour' was achieved with the Kinemacolor red/green process, but with only two colours involved this was technically impossible.
Eventually in 1915 the House of Lords ruled against Kinemacolor, after an appeal by Friese-Greene, breaking the commercial headlock Urban had on the technology.
Published: 2007-04-18

