Assisted Dying Bill
Latest: Assisted Dying Bill, May 2006
The House of Lords has blocked a bill that would allow terminally ill people to be helped to die.
Lord Joffe's bill, which had its second reading on Friday 12th May 2006, proposed that after signing a legal declaration that they wanted to die, a patient's doctor could prescribe a lethal dose of medication that the patient could take themselves.
Only people with less than six months to live, who are suffering unbearably and deemed to be of sound mind and not depressed would be able to end their life under Lord Joffe's proposal.
Peers spent the day in a passionate debate on whether or not it was right to allow a person who was terminally ill to be given drugs they could then use to end their own life.
Lord Joffe said: "We must find a solution to the unbearable suffering of patients whose needs cannot be met by palliative care."
Peers backed an amendment to delay the bill for six months by 48 votes. (148 were in favour and 100 opposed.)
Lord Joffe said the move was intended to end the debate, but pledged to reintroduce his bill at a later date.
The government has said it will not block a further hearing of the bill.
The debate highlighted divisions between supporters of the right to die and those who want better palliative care.
Amongst those Lords against the bill were the Archbishop of Canterbury Dr Rowan Williams, Lady Finlay, a professor in palliative care and Cardinal Cormac Murphy O'Connor, Archbishop of Westminster. They urged more to be done instead to improve palliative care for terminally ill patients. These Lords were also supported by disability campaigners.
Opponents to the bill demonstrated outside Parliament and submitted a petition to Downing Street which was signed by 100,000 people.
The bill's supporters said doctors should be able to prescribe drugs so a terminally ill person suffering terrible pain could choose to end his or her life.
These included Labour's Baroness David aged 92. She said:
Mark Slattery, of the charity Dignity in Dying, formerly the Voluntary Euthanasia Society, said the campaign to introduce an assisted dying bill would continue. Julia Millington of the ProLife Alliance welcomed the Lords' decision and stated they would continue to resist any change in the law.
Other countries
Euthanasia in other countries
The letter also pointed to studies from Holland where euthanasia has been legal since 2001.
The Netherlands has the most liberal assisted suicide laws in the world. Under Dutch law, doctors can administer a lethal dose of muscle relaxants and sedatives to terminally ill patients at a patient's request.
Britain's religious leaders claim that one in every 32 deaths in the Netherlands is a result of legal or illegal euthanasia. In January 2005, a report in the Dutch Journal of Medicine alleged there had been 22 cases of illegal euthanasia involving infants born with spina bifida.
"A similar law here could lead to some 13,000 deaths a year and Dutch pro-euthanasia groups are now, moreover, campaigning for further relaxations of the law - for example, to encompass people with dementia," said the faith leaders.
They also claimed that many doctors in Oregon in the US, where the Death with Dignity Act of 1994 legalised assisted suicide, were reluctant to help patients to die. In the UK, the religious leaders maintain that the largest most recent surveys show that most British doctors do not favour a change in the law.
Amending the bill
After the debate in the House of Lords in early October, Lord Joffe indicated that he might be prepared to amend his proposals so doctors would not be required to administer a lethal injection.
Instead, the bill would allow doctors to indirectly help people die by prescribing drugs for patients to take themselves. This procedure is known as physician-assisted suicide.
The British Government is neutral on the issue of voluntary euthanasia but has indicated that Lord Joffe's revised bill may be given parliamentary time when it is introduced in November.
The bill is unlikely to become law but an amended version could win support from the medical community.
In another unprecedented move, the British Medical Association dropped its historic opposition to euthanasia during 2005, adopting a neutral stance on the issue.