First | < Previous 1
2
3
4
Next > | Last
|
| |
|
Message 1 - posted by wwatcher
(U2345220)
, Nov 9, 2006
Good or bad?
---
My vote:
BAD
|
 |
|
|
|
Message 2 - posted by NorthernGal
(U2344632)
, Nov 9, 2006
Bad.
This is a reply to this message
|
| |
|
|
|
Message 3 - posted by Ned Long
(U3078413)
, Nov 9, 2006
Retrograde! But typically BBC!
This is a reply to this message
|
| |
|
|
|
Message 4 - posted by Lady Cordelia Smyth
(U2279551)
, Nov 9, 2006
Bad.
This is a reply to this message
|
| |
|
|
|
Message 5 - posted by Alpha Hooligan - Gringatcho Demento
(U3245845)
, Nov 9, 2006
Bad.
Bad for freedom of speech.
Bad for freedom of choice
Bad for honest and robust debate.
Good for the BBC control freaks and thought police.
AH
Please note: Your Postings are being pre-moderated and will only appear after they have been approved by a Moderator.
This is a reply to this message
|
| |
|
|
|
Message 6 - posted by Nicelegs
(U2336090)
, Nov 9, 2006
If you can't stand the heat BBC get outta' the kitchen!
To add insult to injury I am instructed to wait 60 seconds before posting again!!!
This is a reply to this message
|
| |
|
|
|
Message 7 - posted by flamingreen
(U2388199)
, Nov 9, 2006
Bad  This is a reply to this message
|
| |
|
|
|
Message 8 - posted by Green Room refugee
(U2333731)
, Nov 9, 2006
Bad. The Green Room could at least be kept.
This is a reply to this message
|
| |
|
|
|
Message 9 - posted by Lee Ho Leeghost
(U1164465)
, Nov 9, 2006
BAD
This is a reply to this message
|
| |
|
|
|
Message 10 - posted by Jack Jones
(U2032563)
, Nov 9, 2006
GOOD Mods  This is a reply to this message
|
| |
|
|
|
Message 11 - posted by exorcistdave
(U744869)
, Nov 9, 2006
baFd
if anyone is intersted thats an F in bad
This is a reply to this message
|
| |
|
|
|
Message 12 - posted by bluejewel
(U1725073)
, Nov 9, 2006
Bad
This is a reply to this message
|
| |
|
|
|
Message 13 - posted by JamesStGeorge
(U225334)
, Nov 9, 2006
Clearly bad. Though every ytear or so the BBC rip out a part of the boards that are succesfull, like the Great Debate set of boards, told them to come here instead, so they can now dictate the agenda as well as by moderation. It is why JSG was created back before the GD closures, when the end night posting was the curtailment of the year. __________________________________________ jamesstgeorge.proboa...This is a reply to this message
|
| |
|
|
|
Message 14 - posted by pushkinbounces
(U4052959)
, Nov 9, 2006
BAD.
If they go ahead with this when the only poster who thinks it's good appears to work for the govt, I think the Daily Mail will make a great story out of this. And for once, I'll agree with them.
This is a reply to this message
|
| |
|
|
|
Message 15 - posted by amanfromMars
(U518427)
, Nov 9, 2006
BAD and MAD.
This is a reply to this message
|
| |
|
|
|
Message 16 - posted by Octopus
(U2440869)
, Nov 9, 2006
msg 1
wwatcher, if only the mods and similar can start topics, then that mean no more religion vs atheist threads
This is a reply to this message
|
| |
|
|
|
Message 17 - posted by It's a breeze
(U777893)
, Nov 10, 2006
ABSORUDDYLUTELY ABSURD TO THE POWER N WHERE N IS A VERY LARGE NUMBER  <LAUGH> <LAUGH> <LAUGH> <LAUGH> This is a reply to this message
|
| |
|
|
|
Message 18 - posted by Joe-Public
(U2333665)
, Nov 10, 2006
BAD and repressive - 'Today' can easily gauge the existing zeitgeist from the current format and if they wish fashion programme content to reflect that
This is a reply to this message
|
| |
|
|
|
Message 19 - posted by DOBBUS
(U2560990)
, Nov 10, 2006
wwatcher: Sorry I have introduced a similar thread, almost simultaneously. I urge posters to visit it, as it proposes a compromise solution.
I think the BBC's proposed changes are BAD.
This is a reply to this message
|
| |
|
|
|
Message 20 - posted by Sticky Fingers
(U5710439)
, Nov 10, 2006
Depressingly BAD
This is a reply to this message
|
| |
|
|
First | < Previous 1
2
3
4
Next > | Last
|
Home
How to 
Are you being