|
|
| |
|
Message 1681 - posted by IronFan
(U1851202)
, Aug 25, 2005
Well if that's it for the day it's been dissaPONTING at the end (sorry!).
Hopefully play will be more cosnistent tomorrow - KP and Flintoff to crack on. Predict a high 300 score and Aussies to be 87-2 at stumps.
Everyone have a pleasant evening (except burnett). I'm sure I'm going to have dreams about swiss schocolate, boats and women rugby players!
Speak to you tomorrow!!!!
This is a reply to this message
|
 |
|
|
|
Message 1682 - posted by lankythegiraffe
(U1851378)
, Aug 25, 2005
Rain. They're offQuoted from
this message
jamie's banned 'em
This is a reply to this message
|
| |
|
|
|
Message 1683 - posted by lordWooHoo
(U1844986)
, Aug 25, 2005
Good evening all, hope to see you all (excl. JB) tomorrow
This is a reply to this message
|
| |
|
|
|
Message 1684 - posted by ian_in_dublin
(U1701634)
, Aug 25, 2005
well i'm ioff home ... see you all tomorrow ...
you've got me fixated on chocolate CC .... damn
This is a reply to this message
|
| |
|
|
|
Message 1685 - posted by OutForADuck
(U1842131)
, Aug 25, 2005
i am wondering why people can still post if he's banned them!
we did ok, just sickening that vaughan and tresco got a start but couldn't make hay.Quoted from
this message
They probably would have donr if the sun had shone a little longer!!!
This is a reply to this message
|
| |
|
|
|
Message 1686 - posted by Red_Baron70
(U1690136)
, Aug 25, 2005
i think with the weather predicted for the rest of the match we'll swing it a lot more than they do. if we get 400 we'll be in with a shout
This is a reply to this message
|
| |
|
|
|
Message 1687 - posted by TheTand
(U1802731)
, Aug 25, 2005
Read my previous!! Yeah we got a good start but it could be one of those rain interupted test matches but I think we'll still come out in front! No panic this end! i am wondering why people can still post if he's banned them!
we did ok, just sickening that vaughan and tresco got a start but couldn't make hay.Quoted from
this message
This is a reply to this message
|
| |
|
|
|
Message 1688 - posted by armchair_fan
(U1867447)
, Aug 25, 2005
thats 430 if you go back to the start of the KP/Freddie partnership I'll take that as a start yeah ... 229 for 4 is ok .... 400 is a possibility still i think ..... we ought to get 135 from kp. fred, jones & extras with giles the the three tail enders making us 80 (including their extras).... Quoted from
this message
This is a reply to this message
|
| |
|
|
|
Message 1689 - posted by OutForADuck
(U1842131)
, Aug 25, 2005
Bugger, get back and settle down in front od the telly and the bl**dy cricket ends!  Boo. Night all. This is a reply to this message
|
| |
|
|
|
Message 1690 - posted by cricket-chick
(U1799634)
, Aug 25, 2005
Night boys, no doubt we will all be back tomorrow! enjoy dreaming  This is a reply to this message
|
| |
|
|
|
Message 1691 - posted by Cricketer
(U1902064)
, Aug 25, 2005
In a ODI it is considered ok to have your number 6 and 7 batsmen with low averages, cause generally they have to bat for the slog overs and have to get on with it with little time to get in, but can the same excuse be used in Test cricket, we see so many teams having number 6 and 7 batsmen (all-rounders as well) with very ordinary averages.
Is it ok for Flintoff, Jones, Razzaq, Oram, Boucher etc etc to have such averages? I mean they aren't bad players, and they don't have bad averages but maybe it is high time that teams set themselves higher standards in the batting department.
This is a reply to this message
|
| |
|
|
|
Message 1692 - posted by TheTand
(U1802731)
, Aug 25, 2005
till the mornin!
Cheers
This is a reply to this message
|
| |
|
|
|
Message 1693 - posted by KevAndCoke
(U1929288)
, Aug 25, 2005
I'm off now so night all
Here's to tomorrow being hassel free on the board, Ive had enough of egotistic b**tards trying to exert their power (or lack of it) to people who really dont care
*chink*
p.s. bet MV is mighty annoyed at getting out to the ponters. They probably had a running bet..
This is a reply to this message
|
| |
|
|
|
Message 1694 - posted by cricket-chick
(U1799634)
, Aug 25, 2005
you want good averages, but often at 6 and 7 in both variations it is common to either make a pretty big score or be out for single figures. averages don't really represent the play-more important to have the high averages at the top of the order.
This is a reply to this message
|
| |
|
|
|
Message 1695 - posted by BeefyBen
(U1728268)
, Aug 25, 2005
England have been very average today. Pietersen in particular has looked very shakey at the crease, and there is simply no excuse for a specialist batsmen to be gotten out by what isnt even a part-time bowler, especially at this level. Weve shown that to beat the aussies we must be on the top of our game, and today we havent been anywhere near it.
This is a reply to this message
|
| |
|
|
|
Message 1696 - posted by Jim Baudelaire
(U1817170)
, Aug 25, 2005
The trouble would be getting someone at 6 or 7 who does have a good average to continue to bat so low down the order. An average of 30-35 justifies their position. Gilchrist wouldn't put up with it at number 7 if he were not the wicketkeeper.
This is a reply to this message
|
| |
|
|
|
Message 1697 - posted by Phelpa Sham
(U1863548)
, Aug 25, 2005
Hope you are right, would be nice.
This is a reply to this message
|
| |
|
|
|
Message 1698 - posted by AtomJohn
(U1653985)
, Aug 25, 2005
For all who are still here - my complaint against the Burnett has been upheld!
This is a reply to this message
|
| |
|
|
|
Message 1699 - posted by donbratman
(U1842483)
, Aug 25, 2005
For all who are still here - my complaint against the Burnett has been upheld!Quoted from
this message
Promise me he won't be back tomorrow?
This is a reply to this message
|
| |
|
|
|
Message 1700 - posted by fesel152
(U1837889)
, Aug 25, 2005
I wish KP 124, AF 83, GJ 72, Rest of them 70. This makes a total of about 550. It is possible.
This is a reply to this message
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Home
How to 
Are you being 
Listen Live