BBC Home

Explore the BBC


28th December 2009
Accessibility help
Text only

BBC Homepage

Contact Us


Like this page?
Send it to a friend!

 

or register to join or start a new discussion.

You are here > Test Match Special message boards > Deleted > Chappell is right..

Discussion:

Chappell is right..

Messages  1 - 20 of 27

 
< Previous 1  2  Next >
 

Message 1 - posted by Karthik (U1734306) , Sep 24, 2005

Bad elements need to be removed. They are exploiting press to bring Chappell down. Secret discussions, secret emails are leaked out to press to show chappell in poor light.

I think whole charade staged by Ganguly has been bought by some people by the look of it. Moment Ganguly found out that there is going to be a review panel, and chappel is going to be a part of it he wanted to know before hand where exactly Ganguly stands directly from chappell instead of getting it from the selectors! So he wanted to sit down and hav e a talk with chappell. He sought an honest opinion. He got an honest opinion straight from chappell. After learning from chappell that his career is seeing the end of the tunnel, he pulled out this stunt to gain some sympathy from some "fans"!!

Ganguly has achieved this mission 5% successfully. I mean some 5% people still support him based on what he did in 1999!!

Do not keep using the name of Ganguly for India's success! Did you guys ever think of the fact that at the same time Ganguly was appointed, Wright was appointed as the first foreign coach of India. Did you guys ever thank the effort of Wright to instil the importance of fitness among players? Just coz Wright decided to sit back not wanting the limelight we should not forget him. Some fine individual achievements coupled with Wright's contribution at various levels Ganguly enjoyed his glory. So don't use those things as an excuse for further extension of his career.

Complain about a message       

Message 2 - posted by Pineapples (U1723771) , Sep 24, 2005

I think the damage has already been done and the situation may well be irreversible.

Chappell was a fool to think he could really change things and Moody must be thanking his stars that he didnt get this job.

Confidentiality and privacy are the very foundation of such relationships. The bullshit can be pulled off before the press but behind closed doors the truth MUST be told. If there is no confidentiality, everything is finished. What surprises me is how few Indian fans are bothered about that. Almost everyother angle has been spoken of but this one. Its almost like such grossly unprofessional behaviour is to be expected in Indian cricket, and therefore no surprise.

To give an example nearer to home, if I cannot be sure that my conversations with my doctor or psychologist or priest are confidential to the point of sacredness, will I ever really tell them the truth ? Will Chappell ever be comfortable enough in the future to give an honest opinion? Maybe an honest opinion isnt whats asked for but a token one because an honest opinion gets flashed in front of the cameras for all the world to see! Why dont we just have a webcam in the dressing room and relay that? Im sure if there were millions to be made off it, the administrators might even consider it!

As a final note, nothing is more funny or disgusting than having the man who started it all - Saurav Ganguly - come out today and say that what has happened should stay between him and Chappell! Well, well look who's talking - the culprit saying that justice must prevail. And as cynical as it may sound, one cannot deny the fact that this whole episode has diverted attention from the real fact - that the Indian team hasnt been doing well and that Ganguly has been pathetic. See how nicely and neatly all attention is gone from that topic. Maybe it was a calculated move and not done in a rush of blood?

This is a reply to this message

Complain about a message       

Message 3 - posted by Karthik (U1734306) , Sep 24, 2005

I look at this way.. Who started it all? Ganguly one and one mr. Ganguly. He should own up the responsibility for this utter chaotic situation. I know it is a calculated move to extend his career.

Just imagine for one second.... Had Ganguly not told the press...?

Everything would have been running smoothly. One fine day we would have found that Ganguly is sacked. That is the way things work. But it is Ganguly who chose to make this calculated manipulative move. So he is answerable for the whole confusion. Why would chappell accuse a player for nohing? Does he gain anything? Does he really get more money? No. His agendas are crystal clear. Build a solid team for 2007 world cup. So he would use all his methods to achieve that.

As long as India wins i am not going to ask which tom, dick, harry are playing. That is the whole objective of a game.. isn't it? WIN. Objective of the game is not whether Ganguly should be in or not.

This is a reply to this message

Complain about a message       

Message 4 - posted by Pineapples (U1723771) , Sep 24, 2005

Hi

Id have to disagree with you on one point - that had Ganguly not come out in the open about it, everything would have gone on smoothly. I dont think it wuld have. Of course, what he has done has made the matter worse - or better, depending on whether you are Saurav Ganguly or not.

The root of the problem lies in the fact that he feels entitled to a place in the team despite a continually poor run of test far dating back to atleast 5 years, and an especially poor run in the past 18 months. Even two years ago a batsman with a career test average of 40 would have been hard pressed to justify his place in the best middle order in the world of cricket but India was winning then and his leadership was truly inspirational. Now with an average closer to 25 over the last 18 months ( discounting the weakling opposition ), the position has become absolutely untenable.

But sometimes when you think of it, one really cant blame Saurav for expecting a free ride for so long. He certainly has done a lot more for Indian cricket than say Agarkar, and if Ajit can be continually picked then why not him? Atleast thats what he must be thinking. Not to mention him having more powerful connections.

This is a reply to this message

Complain about a message       

Message 5 - posted by Karthik (U1734306) , Sep 24, 2005

Hi

Id have to disagree with you on one point - that had Ganguly not come out in the open about it, everything would have gone on smoothly. I dont think it wuld have. Of course, what he has done has made the matter worse - or better, depending on whether you are Saurav Ganguly or not.

The root of the problem lies in the fact that he feels entitled to a place in the team despite a continually poor run of test far dating back to atleast 5 years, and an especially poor run in the past 18 months. Even two years ago a batsman with a career test average of 40 would have been hard pressed to justify his place in the best middle order in the world of cricket but India was winning then and his leadership was truly inspirational. Now with an average closer to 25 over the last 18 months ( discounting the weakling opposition ), the position has become absolutely untenable.

But sometimes when you think of it, one really cant blame Saurav for expecting a free ride for so long. He certainly has done a lot more for Indian cricket than say Agarkar, and if Ajit can be continually picked then why not him? Atleast thats what he must be thinking. Not to mention him having more powerful connections.

Quoted message from Pineapples




What he thinks is not important here.. What is good for India is important here. If it is good that Ganguly leaves then he should leave. He was a successful one day player for a four year period. At the time he assumed the captaincy agreed Indian team was in tatters. At the same time India appointed Wright as coach. Wright's impartial approach really kicked off Indian cricket. Ganguly backed Harbhajan singh. That is the only thing he did that turned out successful. All the other players he backed deserved to play at that point. I don't think Ganguly deserves 100% accolades for India's brief success overseas. Wright played a big part in keeping them fit and fighting. Even assuming he was the entire reason for India's success, he doesn't deserve a place as a batsman in the team. A captain is only as good as team. If the team is bad captain will also look bad. Look at Ponting now. When he won world cup everyone going up and down. Now some people are crying for his head. Just one series loss. India lost some 14 finals. India could not win a series over weak pakistan team coz of his zip code like scores 1,2, 12, 21. He was even getting bowled by a fulltoss. His prodding and swishing outside the off-stump against quick bowlers is a painful sight to watch. India with rich tradition of cricket, is producing 1000s of quality players at all levels. Defenitely atleast 500 of them would be doing a better job as batsman for India. Why is he blocking young talents just coz he won more matches for India?

This is a reply to this message

Complain about a message       

Message 6 - posted by Pineapples (U1723771) , Sep 24, 2005

Ofcourse what is best for the country must be done. But thats in an ideal world. We live in a real one and need to recognize that egos and self preservation, however undesirable, are an undissociable part of the deal. Everyone of us has these qualities, not just Saurav.

And thats why there needs to be a balance of power. Were Greg Chappell to be given absolute power over the Indian team, Im not sure he wouldnt abuse it either! But what he is saying here is plainly and openly the truth. And everyone knows it, everyone has been talking about it for over a year. So why the big fuss? He has just stated the obvious.

I think Ganguly did make a big difference to the Indian team as a leader. He may not rate very high as a tactician or with field placements, but did bring about a sea change in the Indian attitude, especially overseas - atleast until now. Just as Wright infused more professionalism into the team. One has to comepletely agree with you that a player cannot justify his place based on 'leadership' alone because leading by example is an inseparable part of winning and keeping the trust of your team.

This is a reply to this message

Complain about a message       

Message 7 - posted by lordElTel1 (U2103121) , Sep 24, 2005

I always thought that indian cricket was run by democratic elected people but this chapple-gang saga suggests otherwise.to me ganguly should have been dropped 18 months ago.look at steve waugh how he wanted to go to india last year but there is no place for sentiments in sport.

This is a reply to this message

Complain about a message       

Message 8 - posted by Karthik (U1734306) , Sep 24, 2005

I have seen Gavaskar, Kapil Dev, Azharuddin all retiring without being captains. Only in the last few matches i mean for a very short period kapil looked mediocre. All the other commanded their place in the team for their form without being captain. So they did not need captaincy as a support to play as long as they wanted. Ganguly cannot survive as a player in the team. If Ganguly is confident that his batting can do wonders he should step down and play as a player and prove it to us that he deserves a place in the squad like his predecessors. Dropping captain from the team for poor form is not new to us. Krish Srikkanth inspite of much creditable series draw with a rookie India team against the likes of Imran, Younis, Akram, Mustaq, Qadir, was dropped in the next series. Why there is different yardsticks for different players?

Now we have come down to a situation where we have to weighs pros and cons. If you ask me "cons" outnumber "pros".

This is a reply to this message

Complain about a message       

Message 9 - posted by Pineapples (U1723771) , Sep 24, 2005

I dont know whether there are any pros, if at all. There certainly arent any pros in terms of pure playing ability.

In his madness to extend his tenure in the team, Saurav is probably not realising how quickly and terribly he is ruining his legacy, one that he worked so hard to build.

If I had a penny for everytime Ive heard an Indian fan say in the last week - " I used to be a Ganguly fan, but now..."

This is a reply to this message

Complain about a message       

Message 10 - posted by mesha (U1723970) , Sep 24, 2005

"I played well in the Test series and was happy to get a hundred - and happy to win both the matches convincingly. That's what matters," said Ganguly.

Crawling like a snail towards a century against Zimbabwe just goes to show that Ganguly is no longer a batting force. Apropos winning the series, the way Pathan ran through the Zimbabwe side, the Indian team could have won on autopilot! Besides, the best innings came from Laxman, Dravid, Gambhir & Sehwag. And it was painful to see Yuvraj waste two chances while poor Kaif must be wondering at the unfairness of it all!

This is a reply to this message

Complain about a message       

Message 11, Sep 24, 2005

This posting has been hidden during moderation because it broke the House Rules in some way.

This is a reply to this message

       

Message 12 - posted by deperer (U1960100) , Sep 25, 2005

ganguly should step down. He should know when the right time to step down is, and i think its now. Nasser Hussian knew when do relinquish the captaincy of England when things werent quite going right, why doesnt ganguly? was he really the right captain in the first place?
Flintoff said that he doesnt like captains who kick sods off the ground, well i think ganguly is one of them, infact much worse than hussian. i think his teammates may prefer another captain. The new captain maybe should be dravid, although i have doubts on whether he is proactive enough.

This is a reply to this message

Complain about a message       

Message 13 - posted by southallian (U2120623) , Sep 25, 2005

There is always a shaky period in a team's make up when the old guard give way to the new. Its happening with the mighty Aussies now.

For India, its time to leverage the talents at our disposal.

A batting line up that was once 2nd only to Australia, and now a powerful attack, India should not be crawling to a victory over zimbabwe. It should romp to one easily.

Sehwag, Gambhir, Dravid, Laxman, Yuvraj, Kaif
Karthik, Pathan, Harbajan, Balaji, Kahn.

That is a pretty strong line up isn't it? The key is, Ganguly would drop one of the middle orders so that he can step in. But what happens when Tendulkar returns? I would imagine even ST would want to give India a chance to steel the new talent competitively.

Greatness knows when to encourage talent and when to sit back on results past and say to all comers - look at what I did.

Its when greatness tries to rely on poor current performances as justification to remain in a side, its when it gets pitiful.

No one would doubt Ganguly's place in Indian cricket history, but this shananigans is really sinking his name fast.

This is a reply to this message

Complain about a message       

Message 14 - posted by ralston8 (U2121677) , Sep 25, 2005

The bottom line is that Ganguly is unfit to have been in the team since before Touring Austrailia in Dec of 2003. India's selection committee continues to amaze me. Other countries have caught up withthe competitiveness of modern day cricket but not Indian cricket. India has no shortfall of talent, it's just that the players who settle in think no end of themselves, thinking that their place in the team is cemented and it only up to them to retire and give the chance to someone else. It's time Chapel is given the authority to do what he has to to make this team win convincingly and also while winning to keep improvising and not to be in a comfort zone, like some players including Tendulkar.

This is a reply to this message

Complain about a message       

Message 15 - posted by RJ_RETURNS (U1855825) , Sep 25, 2005

Karthik,

You rightly pointed. I still remeber that India/Pakistan series.

Indian played well in Pakistan under Srikanth.Srikanth was more inspiring than Ganguly by any day.He failed there with a bat and the selection commitee sacked Srikanth.

How come Ganguly still surviving as captain.Whole India knows now.

This is a reply to this message

Complain about a message       

Message 16 - posted by unixfan (U2123243) , Sep 25, 2005

I agree that Chappel has the professional authority to disqualify a player as part of his duty to make a winning team for India. What motivates Ganguly to take a selfish stand to cement his position within the team? The role played by BCCI by leaking confidential information to the public is very unprofessional.

This is a reply to this message

Complain about a message       

Message 17 - posted by nobody (U1851170) , Sep 25, 2005

I disagree with you Karthik. People are just pissed off with Ganguly's recent form and thats the only reason why all are supporting Greg. Observe carefully what Greg mentioned in his email:

1. "I enquired with a number of the players as to what they had thought of Sourav's retirement".
-> Greg accuses Saurav of a divide/rule. Now who's trying to divide? A coatch going to players and talking about captain's retirement... its nothing but purely creating rift between the players.

2. "He has lost the trust and respect of his team mates"
-> Dont know how far it is true. Even if it, isn't it b'coz of Chappell's over enthusiasm in runnung to the players and discussing about Saurav's retirement? He's been the leader since 5 years and how can he suddenly loose players' trust just in 3 months? (For that matter he was out of form even before Chappell came. No one ever complained about this even then). Infact Ganguly is known for backing the players and he's been the players' captain.

It is very clear that Chappell wants to dectate terms in Indian cricket. He has some "plans" and wants to implement them no matter what. But that doesn't work with Indian cricket. Its no Australia. We have our own methods in dealing with players. You simply cannot throw out Tendulkar or Ganguly or Dravid no matter how their form is. And that too, its selection pannel's job. Not coatch's! It is not practically possible to treate ALL players equally like Chapell is saying now. Even we have a system where the board pays more money to senior players. Grading system is in there. You cannot talk rubbish to the Captain of India.

Agreed, the system is not good. But its not the coatch who changes the system. Coatch's job is to work with the given team, captain with in the system. If you can't do that, you better quit.

If Ganguly is to go out, he will be sent out by our board. Coatch is no one to ask the captain to get out. Look how the team is backing their captain. Shame on you Chapell for playing dirty with Indian team. Probably its better that we have an Indian coatch.

Bad elements need to be removed. They are exploiting press to bring Chappell down. Secret discussions, secret emails are leaked out to press to show chappell in poor light.

I think whole charade staged by Ganguly has been bought by some people by the look of it. Moment Ganguly found out that there is going to be a review panel, and chappel is going to be a part of it he wanted to know before hand where exactly Ganguly stands directly from chappell instead of getting it from the selectors! So he wanted to sit down and hav e a talk with chappell. He sought an honest opinion. He got an honest opinion straight from chappell. After learning from chappell that his career is seeing the end of the tunnel, he pulled out this stunt to gain some sympathy from some "fans"!!

Ganguly has achieved this mission 5% successfully. I mean some 5% people still support him based on what he did in 1999!!

Do not keep using the name of Ganguly for India's success! Did you guys ever think of the fact that at the same time Ganguly was appointed, Wright was appointed as the first foreign coach of India. Did you guys ever thank the effort of Wright to instil the importance of fitness among players? Just coz Wright decided to sit back not wanting the limelight we should not forget him. Some fine individual achievements coupled with Wright's contribution at various levels Ganguly enjoyed his glory. So don't use those things as an excuse for further extension of his career.

Quoted message from Karthik


This is a reply to this message

Complain about a message       

Message 18 - posted by Silk (U1717598) , Sep 26, 2005

The COACH should have total control over the team. He should get the captain he wants, and he should get the team he wants.

The captain should execute the coach's gameplan on the team.

That's how it is in football and that's how the most successful teams in the world (England and Australia, with Pakistan under Woolmer coming on strongly) operate.

If India think they can run a international sports team by committee, they will never suceed at the highest level.

This is a reply to this message

Complain about a message       

Message 19 - posted by aamir001k (U1814748) , Sep 26, 2005

silk, glad to c u back

This is a reply to this message

Complain about a message       

Message 20 - posted by Silk (U1717598) , Sep 26, 2005

Good to be back. Been on holiday in Italy which has been fantastic.

The cricket season in England is over now. Can't wait for November and Pakistan.

This is a reply to this message

Complain about a message       
< Previous 1  2  Next >
Getting Involved help: How to reply to messagesThis link opens in a new popup window
Complain help: Alert us about a messageThis link opens in a new popup window
Online Safety help: Are you being safe online?This link opens in a new popup window

Messages  1 - 20 of 27

 



About the BBC | Help | Terms of Use | Privacy & Cookies Policy