BBC Home

Explore the BBC


21st December 2009
Accessibility help
Text only

BBC Homepage
Wales
Messageboards
Your Voice
ChatGuide

Education Wales

Contact Us


Like this page?
Send it to a friend!

 

or register to join or start a new discussion.

You are here > Talkwales message boards > Off The Lip > The Fin Article

Discussion:

The Fin Article

Messages  1 - 14 of 14

 
 
 

Message 1 - posted by Malrider (U2467286) , Nov 11, 2005

Just finished reading kev's article on "the fin". I have to say, the article seemed ok but I must totally disagree with his comments on side fins for longboards.

He stated "In fact, many longboard side fins seem to be a fashion accessory and do nothing to improve the performance of the board that a larger centre fin wouldn't do."

Having ridden a single fin for a few years I have just purchased a new 2+1 set up. What a difference it has made with turning the board. With a Single fin your turns are more pivoted.

Please read the attached link for a true view on fins for longboards.

www.harboursurfboard...

www.harboursurfboard...

No offence intended Kev but just thought that statment was way out.
Complain about a message  Reply to this message     

Message 2 - posted by NickFlack (U762119) , Nov 11, 2005

I bought a single fin mal for that reason. Single fins are meant to be surfed traditionally, big sweeping pivoted turns, take a walk up front, toes on the nose, then all the weight on the back to bring it back into the curl.

Having the side fins allows you to be more aggresive with your turns, for the modern "progressive" style longboarding, as seen in the competitions.

Personally, if I want to be doing aggresive turns, I'll take my thruster out.

I don't think you can beat the traditional style surfing.

Each to their own.

This is a reply to this message

Complain about a message  Reply to this message     

Message 3 - posted by NickFlack (U762119) , Nov 11, 2005

interesting reading on the harbour site btw.

cheers

This is a reply to this message

Complain about a message  Reply to this message     

Message 4 - posted by loveulongtime (U2468282) , Nov 11, 2005

Yawn. So much hot air Mr Flack.

This is a reply to this message

Complain about a message  Reply to this message     

Message 5 - posted by NickFlack (U762119) , Nov 12, 2005

that'll b the lamb jalfrezi

This is a reply to this message

Complain about a message  Reply to this message     

Message 6 - posted by Doc Two Skirts (U1644358) , Nov 14, 2005

Just finished reading kev's article on "the fin". I have to say, the article seemed ok but I must totally disagree with his comments on side fins for longboards.

He stated "In fact, many longboard side fins seem to be a fashion accessory and do nothing to improve the performance of the board that a larger centre fin wouldn't do."

No offence intended Kev but just thought that statment was way out.

Quoted message from Malrider




I love disagreement mate, absolutely no offence taken.

I don’t think you got the gist of that quote, and may have taken it out of context. What I say and mean is that, if the set up is right i.e. toe in accurate and the three fins of the right proportions and tri fin set up is great. I ride a 9’2” progressive mal shaped by Mark Phipps and it flies because the centre fin is no significantly bigger than the side fins so as not to create too much total fin area, as a result the board is very loose and very fast. Mart “the mal hater” will agree, I think, as he has ridden “Naomi” and enjoyed the experience. If, however, the set up is wrong i.e. too big a centre fin or the side fins not toed in properly then that will wreck a board’s potential performance. My “fashion accessory” statement was focused on this as I have seen shocking placement on some of the cheap imported boards which have obviously been made for looks only and I have seen traditional retro longboard fins on a tri fin set up and that’s just pointless.

This is a reply to this message

Complain about a message  Reply to this message     

Message 7 - posted by gull (U1549291) , Nov 14, 2005

after your kernow quip you expect me to agree?!

huh!

you're on your own pops, I've cut you loose!

;0

retro longboard fins with a tri fin set up are the future!

This is a reply to this message

  Reply to this message     

Message 8 - posted by Doc Two Skirts (U1644358) , Nov 14, 2005

Only about riding "Naomi", there are more than witness here to you saying you enjoyed her. As for anything else, I expect very little of you.laugh

This is a reply to this message

Complain about a message  Reply to this message     

Message 9 - posted by gull (U1549291) , Nov 14, 2005

....well she did alright by me in the comp so I can't say too much against her...

This is a reply to this message

  Reply to this message     

Message 10 - posted by BiC (U1644464) , Nov 14, 2005

I replaced the single 9" fin on my old Roger Cooper 9'2 mal with a 10" squirrel fin as I thought it would give me more hold and consequently more time up front. I can't really explain it but after many sessions I switched back to the smaller traditional fin. The back end does skip out more but it just feels easier to turn.

Think the 2 + 1 setup would suit more hollow faster waves where quick turns are required and the side fins held keep the rail in the curl.

Need to ask a question re the small glassed in tri fins on my old Neil Perrow 7'4 but I'll have to measure them first. Just seem so small after riding my mal. Seem to do the trick but its hard to tell due to my lack of ability and style. But, get a feeling that a slightly larger rear fin would suit if I get a slightly wider version of the board made for me next spring.

This is a reply to this message

Complain about a message  Reply to this message     

Message 11 - posted by NickFlack (U762119) , Nov 14, 2005

Think the 2 + 1 setup would suit more hollow faster waves where quick turns are required and the side fins held keep the rail in the curl.
.

Quoted message from BiC




This is the bit I don't get...

A shorter board would suit more hollow faster waves.

In the last year I've come to the opinion that you need a board for all ocassions. There's too many people who only surf long, or only surf short, (not you bic, as i see the neil perrow bit), but do you know what I mean?

Why limit yourself through looking brave with your quiver of shortboards, or by being all nostalgic with your 9'2" AND your 9'10"...

Makes no sense to me.

I have a 6'2" fish for small waves, a mal for similar, but a diferent way, and a thruster.

This is a reply to this message

Complain about a message  Reply to this message     

Message 12 - posted by yellowmal (U1657191) , Nov 15, 2005

The 2+1 design is used for "progressive" style longboard surfing, Look at a board with a 2+1 setup and you'll see it has lots of rocker & hard rails ( at least at the back of the board ). Look at a single fin longboard and generally they'll have less rocker & soft ( rounded) rails. Each type is ridden differently.. Some people want to hit the lip and do helicopters on their mal and some people want to noseride and drop knee turn..

I agree with Nick, don;t stick to one type of board ride the right one for the conditions..
I've got a 9"2' progressive mal, a 6"6' JP egg and a 6"10' Channel Islands rounded pintail for the bigger days ( that never gets used anymore!!)plus I'm lusting after a 9"6' traditional single fin!!

This is a reply to this message

Complain about a message  Reply to this message     

Message 13 - posted by Doc Two Skirts (U1644358) , Nov 15, 2005

I agree a mixed quiver is definitely most fun and offers more options.

I've got 10' Bic, 9'2" porgressive QS, 7'2" Original Fatboy Thruster, 7' BB Fatboy Flyer, 6'10" Thruster, 6'10" Ugly Arse Hybrid Thing (never ride), 6'6" Fat Flat Fish, 6'4" Stinger Tailed "Barracuda". Endess options, actually only use two mainly!!

This is a reply to this message

Complain about a message  Reply to this message     

Message 14 - posted by NickFlack (U762119) , Nov 15, 2005

I have a eight and a half foot 2+1 with a pintail and really sharp rails thru the tail.

It has a massive nose rocker and I've dropped into some overhead surf on it with no problem. It turns pretty good off the rails and is a nice board.

Then my nineplus is the board you're lusting after mate... It's a beauty!
9'4" single fin "don" , 50/50 rails all the way, slightly pinched at the tail, no edges in sight. big deep fin at the back, with a little tail lift and a slight nose concave.

My thruster is a corking board. Mayhem, 6'4" with a nice wide tail, but razor like rails going to pretty full thru the mid, then a good rocker up front. Ultra light glass and it screams when the waves are clean!
The 2+1 design is used for "progressive" style longboard surfing, Look at a board with a 2+1 setup and you'll see it has lots of rocker & hard rails ( at least at the back of the board ). Look at a single fin longboard and generally they'll have less rocker & soft ( rounded) rails. Each type is ridden differently.. Some people want to hit the lip and do helicopters on their mal and some people want to noseride and drop knee turn..

I agree with Nick, don;t stick to one type of board ride the right one for the conditions..
I've got a 9"2' progressive mal, a 6"6' JP egg and a 6"10' Channel Islands rounded pintail for the bigger days ( that never gets used anymore!!)plus I'm lusting after a 9"6' traditional single fin!!

Quoted message from yellowmal


This is a reply to this message

Complain about a message  Reply to this message     
 
Getting Involved help: How to reply to messagesThis link opens in a new popup window
Complain help: Alert us about a messageThis link opens in a new popup window
Online Safety help: Are you being safe online?This link opens in a new popup window













Messages  1 - 14 of 14

 



About the BBC | Help | Terms of Use | Privacy & Cookies Policy