|
|
| |
|
Message 1 - posted by torturedsoul
(U2415383)
, Mar 18, 2006
thought the last days games summed the whole tournament up. we (england) were leaderless and an utter shambles in the forwards with support play once again none existent. the only crumb of comfort was that for the first time since the wales game there was a bit of enterprise in the back division. this is comfortably the worst england team (not individuals but team thanks to AR) for 20 years and the priority is to change the coach.
irelands forwards were again strong and have been all tournament. we are still waiting for the undoubted attacking talent in the backs to surface and i thought that they would murder englands back line today but with ball in hand they were a bit disappointing. irelands real strength is in the forwards but they are still not performing to their potential so should be more from them.
wales have shown an alarming ability to self destruct on and off the field this season and a strong individual in the coaching dept needs to get a grip of the whole situation and get them back to their strength of last year. todays game was there for the taking but again they just couldnt nail it down. although will peel get his place back? thought phillips was outstanding.
scotland have progressed massively and defensively are excellent with hadden taking an enormous amount of credit. still not great in attack but im sure that will come now they have built the basis of their defense. well done to them and good to see them back as a force.
same to italy - much improved and thought they didnt deserve to lose today but are no longer a soft touch. more clinical decision making (let them down again today) and more wins on the horizon for them. berbizier seems to have tapped into the italian mindset.
the french - well done for winning the championship but the most schizophrenic french side i think i have ever seen. no great performances from them this year but some rubbish. still they havent played well and beat the rest of europes best.
europes best? distinctly average in terms of quality. a few glimpses today but overall a very poor standard of rugby this year.
and the officiating. all teams have benefitted and suffered from the worst refereeing i have ever seen at international level. there has been a shocking standard that needs to be addressed so that teams dont have (very legitamite) complaints about refereeing.
|
|
|
|
|
Message 2 - posted by extrab
(U3533561)
, Mar 18, 2006
not a bad summary of it all to be honest.
think the welsh will be stronger next year and the english will be ok if we can get hold of our 7s squad. and get rid of ar of course.
cant see the SH teams being too worried
This is a reply to this message
|
|
|
|
|
Message 3 - posted by torturedsoul
(U2415383)
, Mar 19, 2006
no the SH teams will be laughing all the way to the WC final i would imagine.
at this rate new zealand could field their 2nd string and beat most of the 6 nations teams
This is a reply to this message
|
|
|
|
|
Message 4 - posted by sharkfan14
(U3374279)
, Mar 19, 2006
Agree with the last couple of points but feel italy badly done too especially compared to scotland
the whole 6n seems to have been against the positive side who tried to score tries and for those who take this negative attitude like scotland
the refereeing has not only been poor in terms of decisions but also in its negative approach
How refreshing to watch Chris White ( i am relly saying this?) talking to and keeping away those seeking to prevent fast ball and giving wales a good chance of playing their style of rugby and so nearly beating france
This is a reply to this message
|
|
|
|
|
Message 5 - posted by extrab
(U3533561)
, Mar 19, 2006
with the refereeing (in all the games) i couldnt understand whne they were saying let go over and over to the teams trying to slow the ball down. say it once then penalties. if that doesnt work then yellows. often there would be 3 or 4 warnings as players tried to slow it down - this is one area that is reffed better by the SH lot.
This is a reply to this message
|
|
|
|
|
Message 6 - posted by GarethDLJones
(U3537857)
, Mar 19, 2006
Agree with everything said about the Officials. From the first game (Ireland v Italy) through to the England Ireland game I've never seen a series with such incompetent refereeing. Not sour grapes just an open and honest opinion. Bad decisions are determining the outcome of the games. Yes the current England side is poor, but if the ref had officiated correctly England would have won (whether they deserved to or not).
I've read a number of comments on the match commentary yesterday. Yes Brian Moore may well wear rose tinted spectacles but Keith Woods (nice bloke as he seems) takes the biscuit!
Overall a poor championship. I've seen nothing to worry the Southern Hemisphere.
This is a reply to this message
|
|
|
|
|
Message 7 - posted by the_real_ref
(U2601175)
, Mar 19, 2006
Like in any sport, there are always questionable calls made by officials. Mr Goode should stop blaming the 'Irish Luck' for their win over the weekend, and rather questions why Enland lost. Maybe its because they had 'Goode Luck'?
This is a reply to this message
|
|
|
|
|
Message 8 - posted by PUSB1987
(U3362904)
, Mar 19, 2006
did anyone else feel the man of the match decision was slightly biased?
This is a reply to this message
|
|
|
|
|
Message 9 - posted by vileshrew
(U2032217)
, Mar 19, 2006
If a referee is not bias, and no one can say the ref in the Eng v Ire game was bias, then any mistakes have to be chalked up to fate. A good team will win a game even if the ref makes a few errors. (Lord alone knows, the players make enough; I think we can forgive the ref a couple per game).
England played better than they have done of late, but Ireland were clearly the better side. Crying about it won;t make England a better side. Sacking the coaching staff would be the way to do that. There players are almost all worthy of their places; it's how they are playing in those shirts that's the worry.
ps with all the changes made, why did Cohen keep his place? Varndell could have been recalled from Oz; Simpson Daniel would perhaps have done a better job. Suffice to say few players, even at the level I play, could have made more howlers than he has this tournemant.
This is a reply to this message
|
|
|
|
|
Message 10 - posted by bass-ale-4-life
(U3538918)
, Mar 19, 2006
Couldn't agree more. Robinson out. Get rid of Tindall. He can't pass, can't tackle, cant' kick... well at least he can look a fool. Get Tait in, immense in the 7s. We need a complete change from the Woodward regime. Someone new with fresh ideas and who will bring in more talented youngsters instead of turning to the old guard to take us forward. Varndell and Tait should be given their chances. Noon and Tindall have about as much creativity as a beetle on it's back. Bout time there was a serious thinking done about the centres. Too flat and not hitting the ball at pace.
This is a reply to this message
|
|
|
|
|
Message 11 - posted by torturedsoul
(U2415383)
, Mar 19, 2006
"all teams have benefitted and suffered from the worst refereeing i have ever seen at international level"
note the "all teams bit" - this was my original view on the refereeing - it was not directed at yesterdays game in particular before this turns into blaming the defeat on the officials. there are plenty of other threads on that.
although if anyone is going to try and tell me the officials for the england - ireland game were of a particular high standard then i am willing to listen to that argument.
This is a reply to this message
|
|
|
|
|
Message 12 - posted by flankerboy
(U2818097)
, Mar 19, 2006
hu do u think is the player of the championship i believe Mike Blair of Scotland is it and im english no scotish
This is a reply to this message
|
|
|
|
|
Message 13 - posted by mororless
(U2628305)
, Mar 19, 2006
did anyone else feel the man of the match decision was slightly biased?Quoted
message from
PUSB1987
Not just biased, but wrong. Any number of Ireland players played better than Goode.
This is a reply to this message
|
|
|
|
|
Message 14 - posted by U3538460
(U3538460)
, Mar 19, 2006
Goode was simply not !
This is a reply to this message
|
|
|
|
|
Message 15 - posted by extrab
(U3533561)
, Mar 19, 2006
white or o'connell for me both have been outstanding hu do u think is the player of the championship i believe Mike Blair of Scotland is it and im english no scotishQuoted
message from
flankerboy
This is a reply to this message
|
|
|
|
|
Message 16 - posted by torturedsoul
(U2415383)
, Mar 19, 2006
i think at the time it was named england were ahead and they always try and pick a player from the team in the lead (bar phillips for wales against france who was the best player on the pitch by a country mile). it was an odd choice though even taking that into consideration but i dont think any player from either side stood out (bear in mind horgan got his second try right at the end after they named mom). i personally would have given it to o'connell though as he was pretty impressive throughout. did anyone else feel the man of the match decision was slightly biased?Quoted
message from
PUSB1987
This is a reply to this message
|
|
|
|
|
Message 17 - posted by tarifa
(U3484551)
, Mar 19, 2006
yeah o'connell had a good 6 nations. I know he was touted as a possible captain for the lions tour last year but drico got the nod. I think the game is up for o kelly and big john hayes. Hayes was totally out classed in the scrum yesterday. I am an Irish fan living in England and expect some bias in the match commentry, but Brian Moore takes the biscuit. He is torturous to listen to and his knowledge of the rules sometimes is a bit shaky. i know woody can be partisan too but he isn't commenting all through the match!I think moore will be the first person to have a stroke live on air if he keeps on ranting like that.
This is a reply to this message
|
|
|
|
|
Message 18 - posted by jonnyisthebest
(U2847598)
, Mar 19, 2006
. did anyone else feel the man of the match decision was slightly biased?Quoted
message from
PUSB1987
No i dont think it was biased. Yes, ok, he did miss some early kicks that would have put England in a more secure position going into half time, but, on the oher hand, he passed the ball to jamie noon to score the opening try and he kicked two beauties over in the second half that really should have guaranteed England the win, but that was not to be
This is a reply to this message
|
|
|
|
|
Message 19 - posted by malcolmd3111
(U3540911)
, Mar 19, 2006
The english performance, is merely "a symptom of a greater malaise". The conservative power brokers,behind the scenes at Twickenham need to find the Courage to be Creative, and choose a Coach and management team who will pick a Balanced team It needs a healthy combination of guile, strength, and intelligence. Ben Cohen epitomises everything that is wrong with english rugby. He is clueless. The players are there, Tait, JSD, (Perry was outstanding for the A's on fri. evening), Barkley, Lund, Voice etc. If only Wilkinson could heal his pysche. The players and the fans deserve better. Let's see if wises Choices are made soon? Don't blame AR he's just being himself, (a myopic, introverted, lump, like his team) blame those who selected him,
This is a reply to this message
|
|
|
|
|
Message 20 - posted by Billiardo
(U3535794)
, Mar 19, 2006
Yeah What a lot of rubbish.A second class fly-half.No reason to be man of match.Apart from pure bias.What a prick Brian Moore is.I hope Woody has sorted him by now.Shane by a mile or Wallace.
Well done lads.If only another 10 mins in Paris??
This is a reply to this message
|
|
|
|
|
|