First | < Previous 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Next > | Last
|
| |
|
Message 1 - posted by Watchwoman
(U4475729)
, Aug 22, 2007
On the evolution/creation topic it is suggested that Christians are lying when they give creationist views and so too are the creationist websites.
Why would that be?
Christians know that they are accountable to God and are not to bear false witness and if they do there are consequences and judgement to face.
Non-Christians however do not have that authority to be accountable to in their view so who better to trust with information?
|
|
|
|
|
Message 2 - posted by T8-eh-T8
(U1732911)
, Aug 22, 2007
Watchwoman
I think the word 'lie' is very emotive. As in they know that what they are saying is wong and designed to mislead.
I don't think that creationists lie per se, but I think that they inapropriately set certain criteria for faith, and a literal acceptance for the incredible is part of that. So that if you do not believe scripture at face value then somehow your faith is lacking.
It is naive, in scriptural term I suppose. But that naivity does have in itself a certain merit. It is a dangerous game to play though, because it sets conditions both upon God and upon scripture, which if shown to be false, can result in ones whole faith being decimated.
This is a reply to this message
|
|
|
|
|
Message 3 - posted by Leonard James
(U1723043)
, Aug 22, 2007
Hi Watchwoman,
I think the accusation of lying is directed at those Christians who first get their misinformation from creationist sites, and then, after being shown that it is wrong, they repeat it...knowing it is wrong. That is lying.
To suggest that non-Christians are less trustworthy than Christians is understandable, but idiotic.
This is a reply to this message
|
|
|
|
|
Message 4 - posted by breachman
(U3920618)
, Aug 22, 2007
Watchwoman,M1. The lake of fire will be full of people who believed the words and theories of men more than the word of God.
This is a reply to this message
|
|
|
|
|
Message 5 - posted by Leonard James
(U1723043)
, Aug 22, 2007
Hi Breachy, The lake of fire will be full of people who believed the words and theories of men more than the word of God.Quoted from
this message
They'll be far more interesting people to talk to than the other lot upstairs! 
This is a reply to this message
|
|
|
|
|
Message 6 - posted by lacedaemon
(U4120340)
, Aug 22, 2007
Maybe the christians are insecure.
Some have serious issues or are brainwashed.
I would trust the Non-christians as they will be much more likely to actualy have read about it on sites or in books other than AIG which is full of lies.
Its easy to check though take one of their points which is wrong. Show them where its wrong and see if they change their mind. The christians don't change their mind hence they are lying or have some other serious underlying problem.
This is a reply to this message
|
|
|
|
|
Message 7 - posted by smittims
(U1158597)
, Aug 22, 2007
People lie about creationism not because they are Christians, but because they are creationists.
The purpose of creationist lies is to persuade people to accept that the whole Bible is factually accurate; one cannot do this when there are factual inaccuracies on page one and contradictions on Page 2.So the creation stories are the first port of call.
The purpose of persuading people that the Bible is all factually accurate is to get people to join fundamentalist churches and give money, and vote for fundamentalist candidates in elections, and bring about a dominant role in our society for fundamentalist religion.
Everyone who cares about democracy and choice should oppose fundamentalism, whether they are Christians ,other theists, or agnostics or atheists. Fundamentalism is only one highly questionable interpretation of the Bible. It has no claim to fact. It is a distortion of Christianity.
This is a reply to this message
|
|
|
|
|
Message 8 - posted by freeminer
(U7300145)
, Aug 22, 2007
<and then, after being shown that it is wrong, they repeat it...knowing it is wrong. That is lying.>
somewhat myopic this I think! It is possible to show an atheist repeatedly that he has no means of establishing the rationality of his own thought processes, or truth, or objectivity, or absolutes of any variety......then it is possible to put experimental evidence demonstrating that the processes necessary for biogenesis are impossible in front of an evolutionist - do they repeat their nonsense? Of course!
This is a reply to this message
|
|
|
|
|
Message 9 - posted by ryani182
(U1623287)
, Aug 22, 2007
I think a lot of people fall into the trap of taking what is a faith-based issue and trying to force it into fact (i.e. belief in God/non-belief in God) Science can prove neither, it can certainly provide evidence one way or the other, but no proof can be found because science does not hold a monopoly on fact.
Creation is not a matter of science it is a matter of history, science can inform it and provide evidence, but it cannot prove it. Creation does hold a documented account, that of Genesis, coupled with creation stories around the world of a "deity" forming the world.
Evolution is a many twisted argument. As there is absolutely no evidence of transitional forms we can take it that evolution has nothing to say on the subject of origins, and transitiional forms and the evolution of man is a fallacy. Microevolution is scientific fact however, yet still has no bearing on the origins of life.
This is a reply to this message
|
|
|
|
|
Message 10 - posted by Ichneumon
(U2122791)
, Aug 22, 2007
Watchwoman. The whole process of science involves peer review and falsification which, whatever the morals of individuals, much more often than not leads to the truth. Sadly, I have known many Christians for whom potential eternal consequences don't seem to discourage lies. Indeed leaders in some circles seem to have made a nice career out of it.
This is a reply to this message
|
|
|
|
|
Message 11 - posted by freeminer
(U7300145)
, Aug 22, 2007
<The purpose of persuading people that the Bible is all factually accurate is to get people to join fundamentalist churches and give money, and vote for fundamentalist candidates in elections, and bring about a dominant role in our society for fundamentalist religion.
what trash! Jesus said his kingdom is not of this world........real christians take him seriously!
<It has no claim to fact.>
what's yours?
< It is a distortion of Christianity.>
you wouldn't recognise christianity!
This is a reply to this message
|
|
|
|
|
Message 12 - posted by smittims
(U1158597)
, Aug 22, 2007
'science does not hold a monopoly on fact.'
do please list some verified facts which are outside science. I don't believe there are any.
Genesis is not verified history,only legend. It is not suported by historical finds,as the scientific account is.
Evolutin is a simple process which pervades every aspect of life,including the development of ideas and religions.Even the Bible can be shown to have evolved by natural selection.
This is a reply to this message
|
|
|
|
|
Message 13 - posted by freeminer
(U7300145)
, Aug 22, 2007
<It is naive, in scriptural term I suppose. But that naivity does have in itself a certain merit. It is a dangerous game to play though, because it sets conditions both upon God and upon scripture, which if shown to be false, can result in ones whole faith being decimated. >
"all scripture is God breathed" - either you believe what it says about itself or you don't!
This is a reply to this message
|
|
|
|
|
Message 14 - posted by T8-eh-T8
(U1732911)
, Aug 22, 2007
Even the Bible can be shown to have evolved by natural selection.Quoted from
this message
Uuuummmmmm, smittims. Thats gonna really cause a disturbance in the force. 
This is a reply to this message
|
|
|
|
|
Message 15 - posted by ryani182
(U1623287)
, Aug 22, 2007
do please list some verified facts which are outside science. I don't believe there are any.Quoted from
this message
Prove to me, using only scientific observation, that Plato existed. Genesis is not verified history,only legend. It is not suported by historical finds,as the scientific account is. Quoted from
this message
What scientific account? Evolutin is a simple process which pervades every aspect of life,including the development of ideas and religions.Even the Bible can be shown to have evolved by natural selection.
Quoted from
this message
Agreed. Point?
This is a reply to this message
|
|
|
|
|
Message 16 - posted by Watchwoman
(U4475729)
, Aug 22, 2007
PPP
"A literal acceptance for the incredible"
Creation is incredible whether by God or a big bang and both sides do take a literal view, one from the Word of God and one from the word of scientists.
In terms of taking scripture at face value that is better than mans interpretations.
Scripture is, in the main, best understood by the believer as its revelations are not given to the non-believer unless they have a heart desire to understand.
At all levels of Christian understanding there will always be some form of niavity as we grow in understanding.
Usualy lying is done knowingly not unknowingly.
This is a reply to this message
|
|
|
|
|
Message 17 - posted by freeminer
(U7300145)
, Aug 22, 2007
<do please list some verified facts which are outside science. I don't believe there are any.>
do please tell us the basis upon which you BELIEVE that which you BELIEVE to be 'fact' is indeed fact. Without an absolute, your assertion is naive!
This is a reply to this message
|
|
|
|
|
Message 18 - posted by T8-eh-T8
(U1732911)
, Aug 22, 2007
freeminer "all scripture is God breathed" - either you believe what it says about itself or you don't!Quoted from
this message
This is so much rhetorical, anthropomorphic tosh. What does that mean? God breathed? As I say - naive at best. Why do you lump such disparate writings in together as one whole lump? Why would you treat Paul's letters in the same approach as David's Psalms? Did God inspire the myriad of biblical authors? Yes - I can well believe that. Did God physically take possession of those same authors and write the scriptures? Of course not. Otherwise how do we explain interpolations and future adjustments? Was that God editting what God had previously written?
This is a reply to this message
|
|
|
|
|
Message 19 - posted by lacedaemon
(U4120340)
, Aug 22, 2007
Freeminer you refuse to use the meaning of words but instead make up your own. Why you don't look in a dictionary I don't know but your post here is blatantly wrong and considering your attitude pretty close to a lie.
This is a reply to this message
|
|
|
|
|
Message 20 - posted by lacedaemon
(U4120340)
, Aug 22, 2007
Reply to message 11
freeminer,
Now this is what creationists do when they don't like their lies being pointed out.
Claim people aren’t serious/talking rubbish, lie about facts and in your case what fact means (Look it up).
Then to top it off claim any Christian that doesn't agree with you isn't a Christian.
I really, really find your behaviour despicable.
This is a reply to this message
|
|
|
|
First | < Previous 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Next > | Last
|