Posted by Phil-ap (U13637313) on ,
But, you strongly suggested that there might be a problem with his credibility; and that it WOULD leave an element of doubt. You seem to be damning with faint praise. There is no conflict of interest. No, I suggested any comments would carry even more weight if he had no ties to the BBC - that is not the same as his views should be discounted but one of we the viewers being made aware of his background so we can reach a balanced understanding of his standpoint. No they wouldn't. His comments carry more weight because he knows something about the BBC and shares our frustration with what has been going on recently. He obviously does not rely on the BBC for his livelihood. In any case I think it would be very difficult to find a media expert who didn't have ties with the BBC.
Posted by Guv-nor (U7476305) on ,
There's not much essential difference between mentioning his name and depicting him, is there? An image does remind us how he hid 'in plain sight' and all that. Yes a reasonable point.
The Points of View team invite you to discuss BBC Television programmes.
Questions? Check the BBC FAQ for answers first!
Go to: BBC News Have your say to discuss topics in the news
Make a complaint? Go to the BBC complaints website.
BBC News: Off-topic for this board, so contact them directly with your feedback: Contact BBC News
This messageboard is reactively moderated.
Find out more about this board's House Rules
Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.
This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.