BBC Home

Explore the BBC


30th November 2009
Accessibility help
Text only
Parenting Messageboards
TV and radio Directory A to Z Talk Lifestyle Parenting homepage

BBC Homepage
TV and radio
Talk
Newsletter

Contact Us


Like this page?
Send it to a friend!

 
New visitors:  Create your membership
Returning members:  Sign in
You are here > Parenting message boards > Being a parent > Your views on 'Bringing up Britain'

Discussion:

Your views on 'Bringing up Britain'

Messages  1 - 20 of 86

 
First | < Previous 1  2  3  4  5  Next > | Last
 

Message 1 - posted by ParentingHost (U7576855) , Apr 1, 2008

Bringing up Britain is a new four-part series on Radio 4 starting tomorrow, Wednesday 2 April at 8pm, looking at contemporary anxieties and debates about parenting, with a panel of experts to offer practical advice, relevant ideas and experiences.

This is your space to have your say about the programme, opinions on modern parenting and the issues families face across the UK.

For more information on the show, go to www.bbc.co.uk/radio4...

Regards

BBC Parenting team
       

Message 2 - posted by ParentingHost (U7576855) , Apr 2, 2008

Just a quick reminder that this series starts tonight at 8pm on Radio 4 and the team who've made it are keen to hear your feedback.

BBC Parenting team

This is a reply to this message

       

Message 3 - posted by Babieslovemums (U11422789) , Apr 2, 2008

Bringing up baby

As a society we need to recognise the contribution of mothers who give up a salary because they think it's vital to be at home caring for their children themselves. In this day in age it's incredible that mothers still lose out on pensions when they've devoted time to a family!! For goodness sake this is 2008!! You need to make it easier for mothers to make this stay at home choice for a few years - or at least recognise the need for mothers (or fathers - but it's mostly mothers) to dip in and out when the family needs them most. There is simply too much pressure on both parents to work. You cannot do two jobs at the same time. If you do, then I suggest that you underestimate the time and commitment you need to put into parenting, not just during the pre-school years but also during the teenage years. The outcome of the UNICEF report putting the UK at the bottom of the list for childhood wellbeing would suggest I am right. But we continue to skirt round the issues and avoid this complex aspect of the debate. How can the government justify supporting one kind of childcare - ie third party care - and ignore the other type of care ie a mother's care??? It doesn't make sense. The fact is a mother at home bears the greatest cost of all - her entire financial independence - her salary - her job and her pension. It's worth it - but society has to protect the carer. I can't understand why women's rights groups don't take it up. Or are they only interested in equality in the workplace? WHAT ABOUT EQUALITY AS A CITIZEN MAKING POSSIBLY THE MOST IMPORTANT CONTRIBUTION OF ALL? If we don't make this move then it's the children who will suffer.

This is a reply to this message

Complain about a message       

Message 4 - posted by bridraap (U11425740) , Apr 2, 2008

Interesting programme, but I am intrigued that no one picked up on the underlying logic. If parenting directly impacts of the person a child becomes, then what does that say about our own experiences as children in the 1960s and 1970s? Our children's grandparents may criticise our parenting skills, but surely they are the ones who taught us and made us the anxious parents that we have become?

Perhaps our children - those often cheeky, argumentative creatures - will actually have greater self-esteem and be more assertive than we as a generation have proved ourselves to be?

This is a reply to this message

Complain about a message       

Message 5 - posted by tiptopInterested (U5863389) , Apr 2, 2008

A fascinating programme and I look forward to next week but what did happen to the 5 year old, why was he like he was, how did the parents end up dealing with it? If you are using case studies then we need to understand them in more detail if we are to learn from them.

This is a reply to this message

Complain about a message       

Message 6 - posted by stromano2 (U9423686) , Apr 2, 2008

Replying to message 4 about we (as parents) being the product of the way we were parented ourselves, it's absolutely right that the only "training" most of us get is how our own parents handled us when we were children. (This is crazy, to receiver no training at all for what is the most difficult job in the world.) And we tend to either treat our children as we were treated or swing to the other end of the spectrum. So if we were parented strictly we might tend to do exactly the same or the complete opposite.
However present-day parents are also influenced by the prevailing social trends - so that what was "safe" for a previous generation of children (e.g. playing in the park without adult supervision) might no longer be considered wise today.
In earlier years many harmful influences were kept away from children and/or children kept away from them. This is no longer the case.
So parenting styles are influenced by our surrounding society and are also shaped by the standards other parents adopt, the laws of the land (e.g. on drugs, sex, etc.) and what is considered "acceptable" by other parents and other children.

This is a reply to this message

Complain about a message       

Message 7 - posted by BehaviourLorrine (U11425875) , Apr 2, 2008

I would like to introduce myself. My name is Lorrine Marer and I am a behavioural specialist. I am on television on various programmes and I made a series for Channel 5 called The Teen Tamer. My speciality is challenging kids, particularly teenagers - although challenging behaviour applies to young people of all ages. I wonder if you would be interested in a chat?

I look forward to hearing from you
Lorrine Marer

This is a reply to this message

Complain about a message       

Message 8 - posted by clairefm (U11425764) , Apr 2, 2008

Dear BBC Parenting team,

Thank you for a really interesting debate. Mariella Frostrup's Bringing Up Britain was interesting and thought-provoking.

There was some debate about why parents are lacking in confidence these days. The question was asked - why has 'parenting' become an industry? Why are our children experiencing more difficulties than they were in previous generations?

My thought on this is that it is part of a whole cultural change, which is that there is far more questioning of authority than in previous generations. We have seen the authority of teachers, doctors, the police, the clergy, eroded dramatically. We all question the proficiency of the professions now. I think there are both positive and negative aspects to this. On the positive side, it is good that we no longer treat these professions and others as though they are unassailable. However, the lack of trust leads to litigiousness (particularly a problem in the medical profession) and actually undermines the work those professions are legitimately trying to do.

I think parents suffer from this same lack of trust and authority. We doubt the authority of others, so we also doubt our own authority, and this undermines our confidence. I am by nature a loving and permissive person, but I can see as a mother of two girls of 3 and under that they really need and thrive on clear boundaries. It does seem as though some days I spend a lot of time saying no and exercising authority. Yet we have huge fun and both girls seem happy, at the moment!

But in many ways this insistent 'saying no' goes against the grain and I worry constantly about whether I am being an ok mum, or whether I am damaging them more than is inevitable.

So - authority.. we need to learn again to possess authority in its fullest and most healthy sense (ie not authoritarianism!). And I think this will help our children to relax and grow. Still trying to work out how to do that, though... Any ideas welcome.

This is a reply to this message

Complain about a message       

Message 9 - posted by Ashburylamb (U10935256) , Apr 2, 2008

I found this a very interesting programme too.
I was also left thinking about the 5 year old. Our son was diagnosed with Asperger Syndrome when he was in his teens. Sadly I could relate to many of the issues that the family in the programme are experiencing. The parents must be reassured that the problems are not due to bad parenting. We are still made to feel, by some people, that we have a badly behaved son and so I know how upsetting this can be. My heart goes out to that family.

This is a reply to this message

Complain about a message       

Message 10 - posted by Maximama (U11425951) , Apr 2, 2008

I was disappointed to hear one of the contributors and Mariella Frostrup both saying that they had not read any parenting books. There seems to be this myth that you are somehow a better parent if you don't read anything about the theories, philosophies or ideas behind the approaches parents are advised to use today. I've read quite a few books since having my child and it has made my husband and me challenge some of the ideas we held before becoming parents and made us much clearer about the approaches we intend to use. There is so much focus on techniques such as 'time out', 'praise', 'rewards' and 'the naughty step' but as somebody in the programme said, there is less discussion about WHY these are recommended (or not). For example, I had assumed that it was good to praise your child and if I hadn't read some of the books I have, I would probably be heaping praise on my child for all manner of activities. As it is, books such as those by Alfie Kohn, have highlighted for me that this is simply another form of control - children aren't stupid and they know that when you praise one behaviour you are implicitly implying that another behaviour isn't acceptable. Furthermore, children start to behave in certain ways in order to get rewards or praise and/or avoid punishment, rather than behaving in certain ways because they WANT to and because generally life is easier if you behave in that way. Obviously I do sometimes praise, but only when it's a genuine reaction, rather than a 'strategy'.
I do believe that parents should trust their instincts more about how they interact with their child and how they deal with the inevitable challenges of supporting their child to adulthood, but I don't believe that this can really be done without knowing more about the hugely different approaches that can be taken. Other people's judgements were discussed on the show and I think that this can often adversely affect how a parent reacts in a certain situation. Read the information that's out there and see what sits comfortably with you. Ignorance is not bliss and I'm sad that people think it's ok to admit to not researching how they approach the most important job they'll ever do, which will ultimately impact upon who we are as a society.

This is a reply to this message

Complain about a message       

Message 11 - posted by fabplast (U3911687) , Apr 3, 2008

I too can't understand why this programme finished with everyone saying 'I never read the (parenting) books'. While I appreciate the main thrust of this program was anti the parenting industry, surely their target audience is those parents interested in 'parenting'.
Similarly my experience of SureStart and other schemes is that they can never reach the groups they are targeting, so they waste time, money and great effort with the more proactive parent justifing their existence.

This is a reply to this message

Complain about a message       

Message 12 - posted by rosasmummy (U11447900) , Apr 4, 2008

I am sure this program was great, I just couldn't hear most of it, as my 6 month old was screaming in my ear!
Typical.
Will listen again when she is asleep!

This is a reply to this message

Complain about a message       

Message 13 - posted by ParentingHost (U7576855) , Apr 4, 2008

Hi there

To listen again to this programme, please go to www.bbc.co.uk/radio4...

Regards

BBC Parenting team

This is a reply to this message

       

Message 14 - posted by Heathernorth (U11291124) , Apr 4, 2008

I thought there were many excellent and interesting points made - but would like more discussion about the role of other family members - particularly those who often help care for the children - e.g. grandparents. There is often an assumption made that grandparents should keep their mouths shut and just do the babysitting etc - but years ago I learned a great deal from my own mum.

Surely the point is that grandparents should avoid offering gratuitous or critical advice - but that they can sometimes be a help . . . after all they do love both their own child and their grandchildren - and they have had a lot of childcare experience.

Just as parents [mainly mothers] are often demonised - so often grandparents [mainly grandmothers/mothers in law] are often portrayed as interfering old bags who just want to hit children rather than people who just might be able to offer help. I'd be interested in hearing how families in different cultures manage these relationships. If parents are to gain confidence and respect - don't they also need - while remaining independent adults - to retain some confidence and respect for their own parents.

This is a reply to this message

Complain about a message       

Message 15 - posted by Alleannon (U11471725) , Apr 5, 2008

What I find difficult to believe is that it is thought wrong to correct your child with a slap.

I was slapped as a child, when I did something wrong, by parents who loved me dearly and still do. I respect and dearly love my parents and think myself a well adjusted adult.

I corrected my children in the same way and my children love and respect me and I them.

My oldest child who is my adopted daughter (my husbands daughter by his first wife) told me when she had her own children "I thought you were picking on me but now I have children of my own I realise that you were not".

What I see these days is children holding their parents to randsom (I will behave if you get me this that or the other). This leads to no respect for others as they will not be providing any incentives.

This is a reply to this message

Complain about a message       

Message 16 - posted by Grandadpop (U3054464) , Apr 6, 2008

Good morning. smiley

Excuse me but is this a private thread or can anyone participate...?

I am curious to know who you ladies (and gentlemen?) are, since none of the 'regulars' appear to be joining in this debate?

I see the BBC have instigated this thread, so where, exactly, have you come from...Points of View?
Is 'Bringing up Britain' to become a permanent feature - or are you planning to participate in the 'Being a Parent' threads also and join us...?

We once had a thread here called 'Hot Topics' where (within family related subjects) we could debate the issues of the day in some considerable depth. It provided an intellectual departure from everyday work and chores and was a 'lifeline' for SAHM's and SAHD's (especially) whose only conversation through the day usually revolved around their babies and children.

Then, in its wisdom, the beeb unilaterally removed 'Hot Topics' and it took the best part of the following year for us to persuade them to return something similar...'Coffee Morning'. It is not 100% but we are grateful never-the-less.

Perhaps you might care to join us (?) - and in other threads too. You are welcome to stay and browse and join our 'cyber family'. Like any 'family' we have our serious moments, our lighter moments and the occasional row erm but its mainly family related and growing all the time.

Or are you simply here for this one, one-off ('Points-of-View'?) topic, because at the moment, it appears we now have an 'inner sanctum' operating exclusively in our midst and we haven't been properly introduced.
I can also assure you, this subject has passed through our hands many times and will no doubt do so again.

Look forward to hearing from you.

'G' <cup-of-tea-smiley>

This is a reply to this message

Complain about a message       

Message 17 - posted by snowygarden (U11476570) , Apr 6, 2008

I too was very interested in the story of the 5 year old. I wanted to reassure the parents, because he sounds very like my own boy at the same age. Our troubles continued until he was expelled from his prep school aged 9. But he is now 11 and doing much better at a tiny off-beat private school.
I am sorry, it is probably is because I can pay £4,500 a term that I have been able to avoid my son also being sent to a special school. But I am sure that the boy on the programme will also grow out of his unpredictable violent behaviour, as long as his surroundings are not too stressful.
I would guess that the problem is mild Asperger's Syndrome, not diagnosed in my son's case, but I think that his dad is quite clearly Asberger's. The change for the better has come about really because my son is old enough to absorb the world in an intellectual way - he is also very bright, "gifted" in the jargon. He now has good relations with other children, partly because he really wants to exchange ideas with them and tell jokes together. He is also a passionate Scout.
It has helped me to have heard on the programme how two calm thoughtful parents could have ended up in this situation. In our case, my marriage has not lasted and my relations with my son's dad are poor, though slightly better than they were. It is always difficult not to blame oneself, but in the end it seems here that the problems arise out of the child's basic neurology. I am sure both our sons will go on to be very useful members of society.

This is a reply to this message

Complain about a message       

Message 18 - posted by pinktea (U8352546) , Apr 6, 2008

g-pop, there's a link to this thread from the link provided by the host on the first post, i think that's why there's so many new faces on only this thread smiley

This is a reply to this message

Complain about a message       

Message 19 - posted by Grandadpop (U3054464) , Apr 6, 2008

Hi 'pinktea' smiley At last, a 'friendly face'! biggrin

Yeah, I figured that one out. Was just curious why none of 'ours' hadn't joined in...BCJ for one. This is right up her street and she knows her stuff.
I was also curious that if I (and now you) can join in, why haven't any of these good ladies (and gentlemen?) returned the compliment and entered into any of 'our' debates...?
If we can see their posts, surely they can see ours...?

It just seems like a load of strangers have gatecrashed our party and are totally ignoring us! But from the tenor of their posts, I'm sure that isn't the case. They obviously have feelings for the subject and points to make. Just thought it would be nice to let them know we are here.

'G' smiley

This is a reply to this message

Complain about a message       

Message 20 - posted by Sholesa (U2370114) , Apr 6, 2008

G-pop, As you know, I have been a regular here for some time, and I did stream the show (twice). And in adding my two-bits worth, I chose sportyheatherfeather's post because i agree with much of what she/she says. The only critique I would make (and I speak as a grandparent) is that g-parents do have a propensity to step in where angels fear to tread (which can cause mayhem) or parents are reluctant to go to g-parents for fear of hearing something they don't want to. I have an interesting dicotomy in that one of my offspring would NEVER in a millennium seek my input (nor would I offer it) whereas DD3 is quite comfortable in approaching me with problems she faces (and I'm just as comfortable with giving her my take).

But, to get back to the show (and the hosts' specific question about what I thought about it) I felt is is excellent. Because while I found the content critical of the manner in which 'parenting advice' is dispensed, it was non-judgemental about individual styles.

I could write a missive about individual comments.... obviously not for this forum. But, in line with a recent question I had about your HVs, and government intervention, while it was not said directly, I thought there was a general feeling that parenting (in your country) HAS been greatly politicized in recent years.... in a (probably vain) hope that somehow, a one-size-fits-all solution would be the panacea for all child problems.... and doing something, however ill-infirmed, ill-advised, or unworkable, is better than doing nothing. The headmaster killed that one dead, when he said that would require all children to receive one-on-one input... 1) a hopeless objective, and 2) it gets right back to the role of the parent.

I also took note of the suggestion that government policy has 'infantalized' the parent, and how virtually all authority for the parent to be parent has been stripped away by the advent of HVs and government social programs. Then, add in the plethora of, and obsession with TV parenting programs and glossy magazines that now exists, the contents of which are being absorbed by (particularly first-time) parents. And how those programs and magazines give the impression of this little morsel that is so cute and cuddly, quickly develops into the little monster that gets you up when you most want to sleep, that cries as its only means of communication that something hurts or it's hungry (hard to tell which sometimes) and drives you absolutely bonkers! And how, combined, the focus of government, TV programs, and those glossy magazines have combined to make a complete mess of what was, at one time, instinct, or 'ask Mom, for advice'........ or here on this board, for crying out loud, because some of the best advice I've ever seen on the subject is here for free!!!

Yes, I found it very interesting, and I'll listen to the next show too. But, from one who learned from the school of hard knocks, and who raised five to be high-powered, successful, and responsible adults, I think this show has done everyone a service, by highlighting that fact that while 'big brother' might be there for advice if you need it, unless everything fits the program to a 'T', it's the last place to look if you're having a particular problem.

This is a reply to this message

Complain about a message       
First | < Previous 1  2  3  4  5  Next > | Last
Getting Involved help: How to reply to messagesThis link opens in a new popup window
Complain help: Alert us about a messageThis link opens in a new popup window
Online Safety help: Are you being safe online?This link opens in a new popup window

Messages  1 - 20 of 86

 



About the BBC | Help | Terms of Use | Privacy & Cookies Policy