BBC Home

Explore the BBC


28th November 2009
Accessibility help
Text only

BBC Homepage

Contact Us


Like this page?
Send it to a friend!

 
New visitors:  Create your membership
Returning members:  Sign in
You are here > History message boards > History Hub > President Nixon,1960: No Cuba crisis?

Discussion:

President Nixon,1960: No Cuba crisis?

Messages  41 - 42 of 42

 
< Previous 1  2  3  Next >
 

Message 41 - posted by Allan D (U1791739) , 3 Weeks Ago

Try reading this, shivfan, about what happened after the fall of Saigon in April 1975:

An estimated 1 million people were imprisoned without formal charges or trials.

165,000 people died in the Socialist Republic of Vietnam's re-education camps, according to published academic studies in the United States and Europe.

Thousands were abused or tortured: their hands and legs shackled in painful positions for months, their skin slashed by bamboo canes studded with thorns, their veins injected with poisonous chemicals, their spirits broken with stories about relatives being killed.

Prisoners were incarcerated for as long as 17 years, according to the U.S. Department of State, with most terms ranging from three to 10 years.

At least 150 re-education prisons were built after Saigon fell 26 years ago.

One in three South Vietnamese families had a relative in a re-education camp.

Quoted from this message





dartcenter.org/conte...

So much for "popular support"!

This is a reply to this message

Complain about a message  Reply to this message     

Message 42 - posted by N E Juan™ (U2133447) , 2 Weeks Ago


I'm puzzled by your final comment NE Juano. Nixon did open a dialogue with China which seems to me to have been the logical thing to do. Trying to pretend the nation with the world's largest population and enormous industrial potential didn't exist was idiotic. I will admit that the policies of leaders like Reagan and the two Bush's have probably damaged America's relationship with China, but I fail to see how Nixon can be blamed for that.

Your statement assumes, as a lawyer might say, ''facts not in evidence''.

Quoted from this message




Erik,

Sorry for the delay in getting back to you.
(Note to self: don't post on the messageboard and then go away for two weeks erm)

The point I was alluding to was that whilst Nixon opened up the US to China diplomatically and economically it has been very much a one way street in China's favour. To such an extent that the US has a massive budget trade deficit from gorging itself on cheap chinese imports. Not only does this leave the US increasing vunerable to the holders of US debt but it has also contributed to the decline in much of the american industrial base as production has been shipped out east. There were short term gains in allowing this tide of cheap chinese imports but the costs are only now beginning to be felt and will become increasingly painful for the american people, IMO. I think if Nixon could look back on how this has panned out he would have been far more conservative in expanding trade with China and in the long run this would have been better for the American people.

This is a reply to this message

Complain about a message  Reply to this message     
< Previous 1  2  3  Next >
Getting Involved help: How to reply to messagesThis link opens in a new popup window
Complain help: Alert us about a messageThis link opens in a new popup window
Online Safety help: Are you being safe online?This link opens in a new popup window

Messages  41 - 42 of 42

 



About the BBC | Help | Terms of Use | Privacy & Cookies Policy