|
|
| |
|
Message 1 - posted by middy36
(U1653081)
, Jul 3, 2005
I couldnt help but cry for Federer, he is so beautiful to watch and his absolute love for Wimbledon is amazing. John McEnroe is right he is the most talented player of all time and he is still evolving. He has doen what he intended to do retain his #1 spot and his Wimby title.
Hewitt must be really happy right now
|
 |
|
|
|
Message 2 - posted by yellowball
(U1633408)
, Jul 3, 2005
"Hewitt must be really happy right now"? why say that?
This is a reply to this message
|
| |
|
|
|
Message 3 - posted by ooh
(U1681680)
, Jul 3, 2005
Cried for Federer? Somehow I wasn't that moved. Did you also cry for Venus? Coming back from injury, and also winning a third!
This is a reply to this message
|
| |
|
|
|
Message 4 - posted by middy36
(U1653081)
, Jul 3, 2005
Hewitt is happy because he felt cheated with the sedings. he believes that he and Roddick should have fough it out to face Roger.
I cried for Roger because he has had so many silly questions asked. People caling him horrible things in the press just because he didnt win the 1st 2 Grand slams. Not considering that this year was his best performance on clay, a surface he completely dislikes. So yes I cried for Roger because I think despite of his accomplishments he always gets asked questions like "show us if you are the true #1". He is human he will win some lose some but everytime he loses the media turns it into a circus
This is a reply to this message
|
| |
|
|
|
Message 5 - posted by oonerg123
(U1681913)
, Jul 3, 2005
You cried over a game of tennis
ha ha ha ha ha
This is a reply to this message
|
| |
|
|
|
Message 6 - posted by hooman1208
(U1682028)
, Jul 3, 2005
why watch sport at all if you cannot get into the emotion of the event? so it wasnt a classic final but it is touching to see a genuinely nice, classy guy at the peak of his form and being rewarded for his efforts.
This is a reply to this message
|
| |
|
|
|
Message 7 - posted by hooman1208
(U1682028)
, Jul 3, 2005
unfortunately i saw the williams sisters in their early interviews, how arrogant and disrespectful they were about their opponents. just because the PR people have worked on them doesnt change the type of people they are and i still have no time for either.
This is a reply to this message
|
| |
|
|
|
Message 8 - posted by Fed4Ever
(U1678613)
, Jul 3, 2005
why watch sport at all if you cannot get into the emotion of the event? so it wasnt a classic final but it is touching to see a genuinely nice, classy guy at the peak of his form and being rewarded for his efforts.
Quoted from
this message
Right on!! Not a thrilling final cos there was only ever going to be one outcome ... but for those of us who love tennis, it was a Masterclass in shot making and mental control. I was at his quarter final match at Wimby and feel privileged to have got the chance to see Roger Federer play live.
This is a reply to this message
|
| |
|
|
|
Message 9, Jul 3, 2005
This posting has been hidden during moderation because it broke the House Rules in some way. This is a reply to this message
|
| |
|
|
|
Message 10 - posted by steve4sharapova
(U1654520)
, Jul 4, 2005
Yes, Roger Federer is such an awesome talent and a real pleasure to watch (though clearly not to play against!!) He is a superb champion who is able to raise his game at the vital moment and shows a first-class match temperament. Take a well-deserved bow, King of Wimbledon!
This is a reply to this message
|
| |
|
|
|
Message 11 - posted by jayhach
(U1578747)
, Jul 4, 2005
I was also at the quarter final and although I already found Roger awesome, seeing him live made me appreciate even more his incredible talent.
His shots are ,literally, breathtaking - and I saw Sampras/Agassi/Becker and others live, at W'don.
Congratulations to Roger for his 3rd Wimbledon, it is thoroughly deserved.
It wasn't that Andy Roddick didn't play well - he played brilliantly but Roger is just in a class of his own at the moment.
This is a reply to this message
|
| |
|
|
|
Message 12 - posted by jayhach
(U1578747)
, Jul 4, 2005
I was also at the quarter final and although I already found Roger awesome, seeing him live made me appreciate even more his incredible talent. His shots are ,literally, breathtaking - and I saw Sampras/Agassi/Becker and others live, at W'don. Congratulations to Roger for his 3rd Wimbledon, it is thoroughly deserved. It wasn't that Andy Roddick didn't play well - he played brilliantly but Roger is just in a class of his own at the moment.
why watch sport at all if you cannot get into the emotion of the event? so it wasnt a classic final but it is touching to see a genuinely nice, classy guy at the peak of his form and being rewarded for his efforts.
Right on!! Not a thrilling final cos there was only ever going to be one outcome ... but for those of us who love tennis, it was a Masterclass in shot making and mental control. I was at his quarter final match at Wimby and feel privileged to have got the chance to see Roger Federer play live. Quoted from
this message
why watch sport at all if you cannot get into the emotion of the event? so it wasnt a classic final but it is touching to see a genuinely nice, classy guy at the peak of his form and being rewarded for his efforts.
Right on!! Not a thrilling final cos there was only ever going to be one outcome ... but for those of us who love tennis, it was a Masterclass in shot making and mental control. I was at his quarter final match at Wimby and feel privileged to have got the chance to see Roger Federer play live. Quoted from
this message
This is a reply to this message
|
| |
|
|
|
Message 13 - posted by raulanna
(U1648161)
, Jul 4, 2005
If it helps I cried when Sampras won in 2000 & when he won the USO on 2002.   This is a reply to this message
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Home
How to 
Are you being