http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/ipm/2008/10/podprog_notes_and_links.shtml en-gb 30 Tue 22 Dec 2009 13:31:01 GMT+1 A feed of user comments from the page found at http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/ipm/2008/10/podprog_notes_and_links.shtml http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/ipm/2008/10/podprog_notes_and_links.shtml?page=13#comment2 Yeah.. I also think that Ross is a terrific broadcaster, but fire Brand, is an insult to the tradition of the BBC and its listeners, with no redeeming features at all. Fri 10 Jul 2009 14:56:02 GMT+1 http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/ipm/2008/10/podprog_notes_and_links.shtml?page=6#comment1 if someone made an obscene phone call to my private phone I would report it to the police. I think that it might be an offence in law. The possibility that one knows the perpetrator is not a mitigating factor. From what I have heard Mr Ross knows he did wrong and has some sense of right and wrong. Lots of people have apologised in court only to be found guilty of an offence carrying imprisonment as the penalty. Insincere apologies are not an apology. BBC is correct in following its own employment disciplinery procedure, as everything must be done properly to avoid providing a case for employment tribunal proceedings if the ultimate sanction is taken. Tue 28 Oct 2008 19:10:21 GMT+1 http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/ipm/2008/10/podprog_notes_and_links.shtml?page=0#comment0 Keep Ross, because he's generally a terrific broadcaster, but fire Brand, he's an insult to the tradition of the BBC and its listeners, with no redeeming features. Tue 28 Oct 2008 17:30:12 GMT+1