BBC Home

Explore the BBC

Front Page

 
Help!
   Life | The Universe | Everything | Advanced Search
Front Page
Read
Talk
Contribute
Feedback
Who is Online



New visitors: Create your membership
Returning members: Sign in
This is the Conversation Forum for Tiddlywinks
<< Tiddlywinks
Tiddlywink blues >>


Already at Start of ConversationNo Older Postings to ShowNo Newer Postings to ShowAlready at End of Conversation
Postings 1-20

Conversation list


Most of the content on h2g2 is created by h2g2's Researchers, who are members of the public. The views expressed are theirs and unless specifically stated are not those of the BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of any external sites referenced. In the event that you consider anything on this page to be in breach of the site's House Rules, please click on the relevant button to alert our Moderation Team.


There is no Previous PostingNext Posting
Subject: Tiddlywinks
Posted Oct 5, 1999 by Researcher 46541
Post: 1

Tiddlywinks isn't given the coverage it requires. Tiddlywinks is more competitive than football, more tough than boxing and more strategical than chess. There should be at least a channel dedicated to it

Reply
Read the first reply to this Posting
Click here to register a complaint about this Posting

Previous PostingNext Posting
Subject: Tiddlywinks
Posted Oct 5, 1999 by Jan^
This is a reply to this Posting.
Post: 2

I keep saying the same about Croquet, but no-one takes any notice - very strange. sadface

Reply
Read the first reply to this Posting
Click here to register a complaint about this Posting

Previous PostingNext Posting
Subject: Tiddlywinks
Posted Oct 19, 1999 by Global Village Idiot
This is a reply to this Posting.
Post: 3

I do believe I can detect a note of sarcasm in your reply, Mr(s) 46541.
Tiddlywinks is, of course ridiculous - but I'd contend that there should be more room in our lives for the ridiculous.

It's pointless, but it's no more (or not much more) pointless than snooker or darts, which seem to get plenty of TV time. It's surely better TV than chess - Garry Kasparov's nerves never made him miss a bishop-takes-knight-check for the world championship. I'd have to admit it's not the greatest radio ever, after an experimental broadcast produced lines such as:
"And now he's going to squop the red with the green.....and he's done it."

The only reason that it's not as widespread as (for instance) pool, is historical accident - plus perhaps that it requires a bit more strategy and therefore intelligence. It doesn't need a whole channel, but would fill up time on Eurosport just as well as monster truck racing or tenpin bowling.

As indeed would croquet, on which I support jan^ completely: fine game, shame it needs half an acre of carefully manicured lawn which you then gouge great big holes out of when you miss-hit a shot.


Reply
Read the first reply to this Posting
Click here to register a complaint about this Posting

Previous PostingThere is no Next Posting
Subject: Tiddlywinks
Posted Oct 19, 1999 by Jan^
This is a reply to this Posting.
Post: 4

All I can say is that you must be a dreadful croquet player GV Idiot!
I appeared on TV playing croquet once, back in 198? when the first inter-university match was played at Durham, in front of the cathedral. Cambridge v Durham v Bristol (Oxford wimped out). I captained Bristol - we got the bronze medal. bigeyes


ReplyClick here to register a complaint about this Posting


Most of the content on h2g2 is created by h2g2's Researchers, who are members of the public. The views expressed are theirs and unless specifically stated are not those of the BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of any external sites referenced. In the event that you consider anything on this page to be in breach of the site's House Rules, please click here. For any other comments, please click on the Feedback button above.


About the BBC | Help | Terms of Use | Privacy & Cookies Policy