 |
Nature has now done the kind of survey we discuss:
http://www.nature.com/news/2005/051212/full/438900a.html
It was comparing Wikipedia and Brittanica for accuracy. I don't know of any surveys on the accuracy of h2g2.
Traveller in Time  reading
"We must be perfect, they used <42> entries to measure the accuracy  "
You'll have to explain that comment for me.
That Nature article (carried out last year) has been comprehensively debunked, along with much of Nature's credibility:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/03/25/britannica_wikipedia_nature/
Choice quote: "We asked for the data so that anyone could replicate the results,"Britannica spokesman Tom Panelas said."At first Nature said they couldn't release the data because they had promised their referees anonymity. We said that's fine. Then they said it's too much trouble."
It methodology was - to put it mildly - deeply flawed.
The Nature article I linked contains a response to the objections you mention. Here it is for easy reference:
http://www.nature.com/nature/britannica/index.html
They did indeed. And it was every bit as risible as the original article. The Register outlines why: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/03/25/britannica_wikipedia_nature/>.
In the end Nature's method was either sound or not sound. It wasn't, on any credible measure.
Memo to self: check when you have already posted a link.
|   | Subject: How to measure Wikipedia's success.
Posted May 28, 2007 by lisette_in
This is a reply to this Posting.
| | Post: 28
|
hello everyone,
i joined this discussion because i am writing a dissertation on ICT and reputational risk. i am generally focussing on wikipedia and how it can be used by users to write incorrect(at times intentionally) entry which can negetatively effect a company's reputation. like the case of the lawyers of a company who wrote some nasty things about their riva company. of course, their IP address was traced back and they were arrested. if any of you have more details on this case or some other similar cases related to wikipedia or other similar services could you please help me out. of course i'll be adding to the discussion here should i find anythg interesting.
cheers 
lisa
Most of the content on h2g2 is created by h2g2's Researchers, who are members of the public. The views expressed are theirs and unless specifically stated are not those of the BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of any external sites referenced. In the event that you consider anything on this page to be in breach of the site's House Rules, please
click here.
For any other comments, please
click on the Feedback button above.
|
Home
button to alert our Moderation Team.
