BBC Home

Explore the BBC

Front Page

 
Help!
   Life | The Universe | Everything | Advanced Search
Front Page
Read
Talk
Contribute
Feedback
Who is Online



New visitors: Create your membership
Returning members: Sign in
This is the Conversation Forum for Wikipedia
How to measure Wikipedia's success. >>


Already at Start of ConversationNo Older Postings to ShowNo Newer Postings to ShowAlready at End of Conversation
Postings 1-20

Conversation list


Most of the content on h2g2 is created by h2g2's Researchers, who are members of the public. The views expressed are theirs and unless specifically stated are not those of the BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of any external sites referenced. In the event that you consider anything on this page to be in breach of the site's House Rules, please click on the relevant button to alert our Moderation Team.


There is no Previous PostingNext Posting
Subject: Wikipedia HUAMN sources Info incorrect, etc
Posted Sep 18, 2005 by doctorTreborM
Post: 1


The very Idea that ANY humans have been made from Simeon stem cells is ludicrous.
The many LIFE destructions info is quite good but too general. There is NO mention of the exact
time intervals this can or DID happen as the populations of Earth have ONLY a 26000 year existence
before a 3 day dakness reduces the ambient Temperature of Earth to minus 185 degrees celcius via a SUN blackout by the regular visits of NEMISIS; Our Binary Star ( many problems here over 92 millions of years and more! ( See curves on Google)

It's about time that the EARTH denizens realized the reality of XTRA Terresrial input as well. In the vastness of the Universe we are NOT alone as actually we have many thousands of types of "neighbors" in different constellations. The Saucer crashes at Roswell are moot evidence of this. The Lyran Federation is IN our skies as I write and HAVE been since 1884. They have boosred out technology so that we might eventually attain SPACE travel ourselves. However the "powers that be" have fought this tooth and nail!

The World would have ended in 2011 had not our SUM been "Harvested" in 1997 and made into a NEW Hydrogen Star wthout Helium This situation is stabalized by adjacent small neutron stars with neutron collectors through a purpsely made FLUX from the SUN itself. Any Good Telescope with a secondary imaging sceen can see this! The SUN instead of swelling in 2011 to 2015 has now been expended to 3034/ ( AN extar 1000 yrs) Revelations anyone??

I have been an Arospace Consulting Engineer since 1962 and have seen ALL the "changes that have taken place! Starting in 1962, oue SUN went "half life" and lost its equator. Sky Lab was hurriedly made
to watch the phenomenon! In the first 4 days of Sept of 1991, Our SUN turned into an HELIUM Star,
still sans an equator. In Nov of 1997 the SUN again went through an ENGINEERED change and was MADE into an HYDROGEN star and, as well regained her equatorial balance. At the time, a ion FLUX exit
was created ad three HUGE tanks were placed in close orbit to collect Neutrons to keep the Hydrogen balance. Again in 2003, August 03, two small Neutron stars replaced the ytanks and now are keeping the balance by collecting IONS from the flux mentioned. This will have stabalized the SUN-Star until about summer 3034 when our SUN will bid Goodbye and the Entire Soalr system will become giant Iceburgs.
We have until then to settle our differences as Humans and becme ONE civilization dedicated to finding a NEW home around a YOUNG star somewhwre in our dying Galaxy! ( Or be helped from our young next door neighboring Galaxy in findig or being given a NEW planet upon which to LIVE in PEACE! What w do NOW will determine the outcome then! Massive Earth shaking catastrophe's are about to happen starting in Jue or July of 2011...a scant 6 yrs away! If you wish details I can also supply same! Dr, RLM Ph.D /akaB-0b1



Reply
Read the first reply to this Posting
Click here to register a complaint about this Posting

Previous PostingNext Posting
Subject: Wikipedia HUAMN sources Info incorrect, etc
Posted Sep 18, 2005 by Online NowGnomon [See A60420098 for details of new sign-in system]
This is a reply to this Posting.
Post: 2

If you don't like what's in Wikipedia, please change it. Don't grumble about it here.

Reply
Read the first reply to this Posting
Click here to register a complaint about this Posting

Previous PostingNext Posting
Subject: Wikipedia HUAMN sources Info incorrect, etc
Posted 23 Hours Ago by Alex 'Tufty' Ashman [!]
This is a reply to this Posting.
Post: 3


Somehow, I don't think wikipedia would welcome the above. laugh


Reply
Read the first reply to this Posting
Click here to register a complaint about this Posting

Previous PostingNext Posting
Subject: Wikipedia HUAMN sources Info incorrect, etc
Posted 14 Hours Ago by Online NowGnomon [See A60420098 for details of new sign-in system]
This is a reply to this Posting.
Post: 4

biggrin


Reply
Read the first reply to this Posting
Click here to register a complaint about this Posting

Previous PostingNext Posting
Subject: Wikipedia HUAMN sources Info incorrect, etc
Posted 14 Hours Ago by EEGOGEE---formerly-Julzes-Yroix----name from number 3360633---original-name-from-July-zero-six
This is a reply to this Posting.
Post: 5

That must have been a joke.

Reply
Read the first reply to this Posting
Click here to register a complaint about this Posting

Previous PostingNext Posting
Subject: Wikipedia HUAMN sources Info incorrect, etc
Posted 14 Hours Ago by Online NowGnomon [See A60420098 for details of new sign-in system]
This is a reply to this Posting.
Post: 6

It doesn't look like a joke to me.

Reply
Read the first reply to this Posting
Click here to register a complaint about this Posting

Previous PostingNext Posting
Subject: Wikipedia HUAMN sources Info incorrect, etc
Posted 14 Hours Ago by EEGOGEE---formerly-Julzes-Yroix----name from number 3360633---original-name-from-July-zero-six
This is a reply to this Posting.
Post: 7

Well, it's a pretty pathetic attempt at disinformation, if not a joke. I'd say that in the writer's mind it may have been both, but he vanished. Could have been dementia of some sort, I suppose.

Reply
Read the first reply to this Posting
Click here to register a complaint about this Posting

Previous PostingThere is no Next Posting
Subject: Wikipedia HUAMN sources Info incorrect, etc
Posted 13 Hours Ago by Online NowGnomon [See A60420098 for details of new sign-in system]
This is a reply to this Posting.
Post: 8

It was an attempt to reveal the truth, because he's not allowed to publish stuff like that on Wikipedia, and anybody can put any old rubbish here as long as it is not defamatory.

ReplyClick here to register a complaint about this Posting


Most of the content on h2g2 is created by h2g2's Researchers, who are members of the public. The views expressed are theirs and unless specifically stated are not those of the BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of any external sites referenced. In the event that you consider anything on this page to be in breach of the site's House Rules, please click here. For any other comments, please click on the Feedback button above.


About the BBC | Help | Terms of Use | Privacy & Cookies Policy