| | |  | This is the Conversation Forum for Hackers and Crackers Inisght >> |  |
 |  |  | Subject: Wrong (IMHO) Posted Mar 11, 2002 by GargleBlaster
|  | Posting
1
  |  | There seems to be a large misconception about the terms hackers and crackers. A hacker is someone who will gain access to a remote system by discovering a hole in that systems security, for the simple reason to find out how that system works. Pure knowledge. A cracker is someone who will remove the protection from commercial software pacages for the sole reason to understand how that protection scheme works and helping the programmer to implement a better one. Also for backup purposes. From then on is just a matter of malicious hackers and curious hackers...
|
 |  |  | Subject: Wrong again! (IMO) Posted Mar 4, 2003 by Jargon This is a reply to this Posting
|  | Posting
2
  |  | "A hacker is someone who will gain access to a remote system by discovering a hole in that systems security, for the simple reason to find out how that system works. Pure knowledge. A cracker is someone who will remove the protection from commercial software pacages for the sole reason to understand how that protection scheme works and helping the programmer to implement a better one. Also for backup purposes."
Written by a 1337 H4X0R, no doubt. Your definition of 'cracker' is a particular sub-breed of cracker -- the copyright cracker, or warez d00d who has programming skill.
Hacker -- a particularly skilled computer user. That's it. (Warning: Occam's Razor has been applied liberally to your original definition. Watch for sharp edges.) Cracker -- Insolent little beggar who likes breaking into your computers and screwing your stuff up for fun. Sub-breeds of Cracker: -- warez d00d -- a person who collects copious amounts of pirated software. "He who dies with the most warez wins" is an unspoken motto -- script kiddie -- the most annoying of crackers. Having no real programming skill, script kiddies use scripts and programs written by proper crackers (or hackers who needed to get around a particular vulnerability) to, in the words of Quinten Tarantino, "f**k your s**t up". Regarded by hackers has having less value as a living creature than marketroids, suits and lawyers.
For more details, go to http://info.astrian.net/jargon/terms/h/hacker.html and http://info.astrian.net/jargon/terms/c/cracker.html -- they're from the top-PageRank(tm)ed JARGON file mirror.
|
 |  |  | Subject: Wrong again! (IMO) Posted Feb 26, 2005 by hardlyNoticable This is a reply to this Posting
|  | Posting
3
  |  | No, Prophet was right.
And I don't see why people have a problem with Hacker having the definition it has now. Words mean what people think they mean, and hacker hasn't meant l33t computer enthusiasts since Wargames or even earlier. I mean, I once heard that Pencil was latin for "Small Pen1s"... but who remembers that?! Well, I mean, besides me.
Here are what I think the most generally accepted definitions of some of these words are:
Hackers are people who break into computers for sport.
Crackers are people who crack software
warezers are people who trade cracked software
phreakers are people who invent/utilize computer dodges (eg. the now mostly extinct phone phreakers)
|
|
| 
   
 
Conversation list
Most of the content on h2g2 is created by h2g2's Researchers, who are members of the public. The views expressed are theirs and unless specifically stated are not those of the BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of any external sites referenced. In the event that you consider anything on this page to be in breach of the site's House Rules, please click on the relevant button to alert our Moderation Team. |