| | |  | This is the Conversation Forum for The Bible - a Perspective
<< The verses
A Challenge! A criticism! and "deadly serious bits"! >> | |
| | | Subject: A question for the biblical scolars
Posted Jan 26, 2003 by Dad 'n Dave
This is a reply to this Posting
| | Posting
2
  | | There certainly is plenty of opportunity for interpretation in the Bible, and this opportunity has certainly been liberally exercised over a long, long period of time.
I am no biblical scholar, but I had a chat to a Jewish friend of mine about the use of the plural pronouns in Genesis - eg "Let us make man in our own image" and the response may have some relevance here.
Interestingly, the pronoun "he" appears not to be part of the original Hebrew text, but there is no doubt that the word translated as "God" is in fact plural and, apparently, means "gods in the ordinary sense", whatever that is supposed to mean ! Sometimes it is apparently used to mean angels. So, perhaps, and I am by no means an expert on this, a number of men and women were created "in our image" by the "gods in the ordinary sense" and perhaps it was Adam and Eve who were created by the Lord God? This would then have meant that there were plenty of sons and daughters of men "available" without the need for incest.
As I said, there is plenty of room for interpretation.
|
| | | Subject: A question for the biblical scolars
Posted Jan 27, 2003 by Dad 'n Dave
This is a reply to this Posting
| | Posting
4
| | Fair point.
Interestingly, I read an article .... (somewhere, sorry can't recall now) that suggested that the story of the great flood may have arisen from the broaching of connecting points such as the straits of Gibraltar and the Dardenelles, as sea levels rose after the last ice age. Apparently, there is some evidence on the sea floor of the effect of rushing water that is consistent with a large dam breaking.
This, of course, is not consistent with 40 days and nights of rain (although it could have been coincidental), and it is not necessarily exactly the same timing, but I think it is interesting nonetheless. It would also make the flood something that would have been experienced on a relatively global scale, especially at lower altitudes.
|
| | | Subject: A question for the biblical scolars
Posted Jan 28, 2003 by Recumbentman
This is a reply to this Posting
| | Posting
8
| | Babel is post Noah.
No incest necessary; Adam and Eve had two sons, Cain and Abel. Cain left home and married a wife (Gen 4.16) before Adam and Eve had their next child, Seth; this suggests that Adam was not created the first anthropoid, but the first anthropoid with the magical power of language (see Gen. 3.22). The story if read this way ties in fine with modern evolutionary theory, though in the modern version Adam never met Eve; they were the father and mother of all people now on earth but they lived at different times. Steve Jones has a new book on the subject (out now or soon).
Clive Ponting makes a good case for the bible "creation" story coinciding with the beginning of settled farming (c 10-20,000 years ago), in A Green History of the World (excellent book).
More to the point of the present article, I can't agree that Revelation is good fun. It has landed the Catholic Church in hot water, following its advice (ch 22.11: "He that is unjust, let him be unjust still: and he which is filthy, let him be filthy still . . .")
|
| | | Subject: A question for the biblical scolars
Posted Feb 3, 2003 by finnjim, THE Teacher, messing with peoples minds since 1997
This is a reply to this Posting
| | Posting
14
| | I'm a catholic and speaking as such there has been a huge turn away from the church. Not necesarily the religion but the whole notion of going to church. I think it not only has to do with a general feeling of apathy but also the two faced preaching of the Priesthood. Where they are up on the pulpit preaching one thing but behing the scenes they ignore their own preaching. Also all you have to do is look at the history of the catholic church and it's disregard for the general public. During the middle ages when the general population had very little the church took that to build cathedrals all over europe. Not to mention what the early missionarys did in the name of "GOD".
I think Homer Simpson said it best when in a dream he was having a conversation with god and was asked the question why does he not want to go to mass. "Why should i go to be told all the reasons why i'm going to hell" 
|
| | | Subject: A question for the biblical scolars
Posted Feb 5, 2003 by Phoenician Trader
This is a reply to this Posting
| | Posting
18
| | A lot of Christian teachings come from the collapse of the Western Empire. Between 300-350AD (I think) the number of schools in the West halved! Christianity stopped talking about loving one's neighbour and switched to basic morals (which was all the Visigoths, Ostragoths and Ultragoths could understand).
Consider in 300AD, they could build a 50mile aquaduct with a continual gradiant without using arithmetic (roman numerals aren't great for addition, let alone division) - by 400AD a round hut with a thatched roof was a supreme architectural achievement. Christian teaching has taken 1700 years to extract itself from that intellectual mire and isn't free yet.
Original sin (in a Western European sense) is a product of the imagination of St Augustine of Hippo. The Eastern church never bought into the same conception through sex=original sin.
PT
|
| | | Subject: A question for the biblical scolars
Posted Feb 6, 2003 by Hermi the Cat
This is a reply to this Posting
| | Posting
19
| | There is a common view among conservative Christians that Adam and Eve did have daughters (you may have noticed that female offspring are raraly named in the Old Testament unless something important happens with them) and that these daughters are the wives of Cain, Abel and Seth. Incest was not forbidden in the OT until much later. Many years after the fall close family marriages were still common. Abraham married his half sister and Isaac married his cousin.
Answers In Genesis has a really great website that explains a literal scholar's view the creation of man, the fall, the flood and the tower of Babel. (Which happened after the flood.) http://www.answersingenesis.org/intro.asp
|
|
|
   
 
Conversation list
Most of the content on h2g2 is created by h2g2's Researchers, who are members of the public. The views expressed are theirs and unless specifically stated are not those of the BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of any external sites referenced. In the event that you consider anything on this page to be in breach of the site's House Rules, please click on the relevant  button to alert our Moderation Team. |
Home
