| | |  | This is the Conversation Forum for Blood, Bandages and Barber Poles - the History of Barbers << Alexander please read this >> |  |
 |  |  | Subject: Fascinating Posted Jan 21, 2003 by Count Zero This is a reply to this Posting
|  | Posting
5
  |  | Yes. Apparently the maggots are very good at not eating living flesh but devouring all the necrotic flesh. It seems to be very therapeutic but... still
::runs away from convo with a serious case of the heebildy-geebildies::
<--to indicate the nasty full body spasm instigated by the thought of what that "cure" might feel like.
and again.
|
 |  |  | Subject: Fascinating Posted Jan 23, 2003 by Count Zero This is a reply to this Posting
|  | Posting
9
  |  | That sounds like a product I've seen advertised here in the states, but apparently invented in Australia, called (I'm NOT making this up) Nad's. It uses some sugar based substance in the same way as waxing. The ads for Nad's (couldn't resist) and similiar products always show some hirsute fellow having a sample carpet swatch removed from his back or leg.
You know the thought just crosses my mind that with all the ways we humans torture ourselves to remove body hair we really are trying to distance ourselves from our primate cousins and it's no wonder we "never invite them for dinner."
|
 |  |  | Subject: Fascinating Posted Jan 24, 2003 by Farlander This is a reply to this Posting
|  | Posting
13
  |  | especially when there are things called 'safety razors' readily available in the market (which i'm sure cost less than wax). still, i suppose, if you like the pain... <ouch>
what, do you suppose, is it that triggers mankind's revulsion towards hair? do we associate it with tangled masses and therefore to bums and convicts? or does it remind us of medusa's writhing hairdo disaster? i'm interested to hear what you guys have to say... it might make another interesting article
|
 |  |  | Subject: Fascinating Posted Jan 24, 2003 by Saturnine This is a reply to this Posting
|  | Posting
19
  |  | Men shave because they don't like getting food in their beards. Also it probably dates back to warring times. Having a beard meant your enemy could pull you down by it and spear you in the back...disadvantage. Also, Romans didn't have them...something to do with religion maybe?
|
|
| 
   
   
Conversation list
Most of the content on h2g2 is created by h2g2's Researchers, who are members of the public. The views expressed are theirs and unless specifically stated are not those of the BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of any external sites referenced. In the event that you consider anything on this page to be in breach of the site's House Rules, please click on the relevant button to alert our Moderation Team. |