Posted Sep 13, 2002 by BobTheFarmer. I'm not really here.
What do people think about the downing of flight 93, there is strong evidence that it was shot down:
The wreckage was scattered over a large area, which is not consistent with the report of it exploding when it hit the ground.
The furthest piece of wreckage from the main crash site was a piece of engine 8 miles away. Sidewinder missiles target the engine.
An unmarked white fighter jet was seen by many witnesses flying at low level and circling around the crash site twice before flying off.
American agencies first of all denied any planes in the area, but later claimed that this was a civilian plane flying at 5000 feet to give co-ordinates of the crash site. This plane and pilot have never been traced and witnesses have discounted the plane as it bore no resemblance to the one seen.
Earthquake measuring equipment proves a supersonic plane was in the area at this time as the sonic boom has shown up on the equipment.
Why do the American authorities feel they have to cover everything up? Im sure nobody would have objected to the plane being shot down if it would save lives. Its a knee jerk reaction to cover-up. No wonder 99.9999% of conspiracy theories originate from the US.
|
 
|  | |
|
|
|
|
Key |  |  |
A: An older reply to the parent Posting
B: The parent Posting, to which this is a reply
C: A newer reply to the parent posting
D: The first reply to this Posting
| | |
Click on this icon to make a complaint about a specific Posting | |
Home
Reply
