BBC Home

Explore the BBC

h2g2
6th January 2010
Accessibility help
Text only

.

Conversation Forum


SEARCH h2g2
Edited Entries only
Search h2g2Advanced Search


New visitors: Create your membership
Returning members: Sign in
BBC Homepage
The Guide to Life, The Universe and Everything.

This is the Conversation Forum for Talking Point: Predictions for the Future
Contact Us


Like this page?
Send it to a friend!

 
Previous List | Next List | Postings 1-20Postings 21-40Postings 41-60Conversation list
<< The M25 and spegetti junction
Political Future >>

Looking forward to this..
Post: 41
Posted Oct 9, 2002 by Bodhisattva
Didn't know that. Can't have been easy. Wonder if that's where the notion that women are bad drivers came from?

TR, you might be interested in a conversation thread called "I'm gonna raise a mass theological debate here: God; fact, or fiction".

If so, you can access it via my space.

Bod.

Disclaimer: whilst it is true that the average man has better spatial awareness than the average woman (biological fact), I think that the average woman is a better driver than the average man, the main reason being that extra caution arising from the average woman being less aggressive than the average man (that whole pesky testosterone thing) outweighs the spatial awareness thing. smiley

Reply 

Previous PostNext Post
Click to Make a Complaint
The Parent Posting, to Which This is a Reply
An Older Reply to the Parent PostingThis PostingA Newer Reply to the Parent Posting
The First Reply to This Posting

Looking forward to this..
Post: 42
Posted Oct 9, 2002 by (TonsilRevenge) My adulthood is in remission
I try to avoid discussions of whether God exists or not.
For my particular mental health, I need to assume that there is a guiding or, at least, a pervasive force in the universe.
That gives me a base line to compare events and philosophies against.
The version of deity that is presented in the Bible is the particular philosophy that I deal with on a daily basis because I think that a culture that purports to believe in something, such as a book, should actually be reading that book and have some small knowledge of where it comes from.

Women drivers are also a discussion I choose to avoid, because in my experience, there are many people who shouldn't be driving, regardless of sex, myself foremost among them.

There oughta be a law against people like me driving.
I am easily distracted.
I am startled by bright lights and rapidly moving objects.
I hate speed and heights.
I have no directional sense.
And any place I have to go, I'm probably better off not going there, cause I probably do not know what I am doing when I get there.
biggrin

Reply 

Previous PostNext Post
Click to Make a Complaint
The Parent Posting, to Which This is a Reply
An Older Reply to the Parent PostingThis PostingA Newer Reply to the Parent Posting
The First Reply to This Posting

Looking forward to this..
Post: 43
Posted Oct 9, 2002 by Zarquon's Singing Fish!
Actually, I agree with both of you. There are some people who should not be driving, and men and women, generally speaking, have those characteristics. I've seen the research findings.

Interestingly, men tend to class themselves as more skillful than safe and women as more safe than skillful and so women tend to have fewer and less serious accidents. Men who are more likely to have accidents engage in 'deliberate law violations', such as speeding, jumping the lights, close and aggressive following, etc. Women are more likely to have accidents as a result of carelessness or misjudgements. However, as women have lighter bodyframes, they are more likely to be more seriously injured in the same type of accident (ie an accident of equal seriousness).

fish musicalnote

Reply 

Previous PostNext Post
Click to Make a Complaint
The Parent Posting, to Which This is a Reply
An Older Reply to the Parent PostingThis PostingA Newer Reply to the Parent Posting
The First Reply to This Posting

Looking forward to this..
Post: 44
Posted Oct 11, 2002 by (TonsilRevenge) My adulthood is in remission
Various government bodies in the early days of automobiles considered them to be trackless railroad engines.
The regulatory tests and requirements were reflective of the attitude that the vehicle was a big smelly dangerous piece of machinery.

Apparently, over the past century, under pressure from the investors who needed to sell a lot of the things in order to make a profit, the regulations have been dumbed down to where all you have to do is pass a couple of tests, none of which require the 'driver' to learn about the motor, the tires, the complexity of the vehicle.

So, you have people who believe that is is their 'right' to drive and so they do, like they were racing, or plowing....

Considering that an automobile is, in many cases, more dangerous than a shotgun... It is sad that they are so taken for granted.

I am scared of them.

Reply 

Previous PostNo Next Post
Click to Make a Complaint
The Parent Posting, to Which This is a Reply
An Older Reply to the Parent PostingThis PostingA Newer Reply to the Parent Posting
The First Reply to This Posting

Key
Navigation Example
A: An older reply to the parent Posting
B: The parent Posting, to which this is a reply
C: A newer reply to the parent posting
D: The first reply to this Posting
Click to Make a Complaint
 Click on this icon to make a complaint about a specific Posting
Previous List | Next List | Postings 1-20Postings 21-40Postings 41-60Conversation list
<< The M25 and spegetti junction
Political Future >>






Disclaimer

Most of the content on h2g2 is created by h2g2's Researchers, who are members of the public. The views expressed are theirs and unless specifically stated are not those of the BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of any external sites referenced. In the event that you consider anything on this page to be in breach of the site's House Rules, please click here. For any other comments, please click on the Feedback button above.




About the BBC | Help | Terms of Use | Privacy & Cookies Policy