BBC Home

Explore the BBC

h2g2
6th January 2010
Accessibility help
Text only

.

Conversation Forum


SEARCH h2g2
Edited Entries only
Search h2g2Advanced Search


New visitors: Create your membership
Returning members: Sign in
BBC Homepage
The Guide to Life, The Universe and Everything.

This is the Conversation Forum for Human Evolution - the Aquatic Ape Hypothesis
Contact Us


Like this page?
Send it to a friend!

 
Conversation list
<< Diving reflex...
The Salmon of Doubt >>

aquatic ape
Post: 1
Posted Jun 8, 2002 by Foxglove4200
This is the first I ever heard of the idea that homo sapiens have an aquatic heritage and I find the whole possibility very intriguing. Actually more intriguing is the controversy over the topic and the way many scientist, if the reports here are accurate, are trying to shelve the idea as a threat to their own self professed expertise on the subject of evolution. In my view everyone is trying to over simplify the process to some extent. Traditional theory holding to the idea that homo sapiens are directly decended from the savannah apes and the aquatic theorists saying a more aquatic ancestor akin to the predecessors of dolphins and whales must be more prevalent. Then there are the all too over-simplyfied creationists who avoid the whole thinking process by saying that homo sapiens are just the product of some being's deranged imagination. Evolution is just not that simple, if you need to see how complex it can get read the entry on the duckbilled platypus. Beak like a duck, lays eggs like birds and reptiles, has fur and warm blood like a mammal. This creature strongly exhibit that mammals had to evolve from the earlier dominating species of the planet, i.e reptiles, birds, and fish. Just thought of the fish, they also lay eggs for reproductive purposes. It is understandable for contemporary scientists to hold closely to the savannah ape idea with genetic evidence linking humans to chimpanzies, gorillas and other modern apes. It is important to remember that the 90%+ shared genetic codes between these ape species does not indicate that humans evolved from gorillas and chimpazees but rather they all evolved from a shared ancestor. That ancestor accounts for a huge amount of the similarities, and where those ancestors strayed with contact to other species evolution set the path for humans from a small influx of an aquatic cousin while gorillas etc. had no such aquatic cousins in their family.

Reply 

No Previous PostNo Next Post
Click to Make a Complaint
The Parent Posting, to Which This is a Reply
An Older Reply to the Parent PostingThis PostingA Newer Reply to the Parent Posting
The First Reply to This Posting

Key
Navigation Example
A: An older reply to the parent Posting
B: The parent Posting, to which this is a reply
C: A newer reply to the parent posting
D: The first reply to this Posting
Click to Make a Complaint
 Click on this icon to make a complaint about a specific Posting
Conversation list
<< Diving reflex...
The Salmon of Doubt >>






Disclaimer

Most of the content on h2g2 is created by h2g2's Researchers, who are members of the public. The views expressed are theirs and unless specifically stated are not those of the BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of any external sites referenced. In the event that you consider anything on this page to be in breach of the site's House Rules, please click here. For any other comments, please click on the Feedback button above.




About the BBC | Help | Terms of Use | Privacy & Cookies Policy