Posted Aug 2, 2009 by Nosebagbear (Nbb)
Interesting point - if douglas adams started the guide - there cannot of been any other researchers - as such his entries cannot have passed peer review therefore his entries under normal h2g2 rules should be deleted.
Solution
Douglas Adams is a demi-god and as such his points are naturally assumed to have been agreed with by all .
Question - has anyone found atypo in his message?
|
 
|  | |
|
|
Posted Aug 5, 2009 by Mina - Older on the outside, inside still 14
Entries aren't deleted because they didn't go through PR. In the 'olden' days uni projects completely missed PR, and I've got at least two pre-PR entries that were accepted by the Eds without anyone else having a look in. Also my two uni projects were pre-PR too.
Very occasionally entries that are nonsense are demoted, but never deleted. Even bad entries are just marked for needing an update.
|
| | |
|
|
Posted Aug 5, 2009 by Nosebagbear (Nbb)
ahhh, how many people did h2g2 have before the new stuff came in, PR, being linked to the bbc etc?
|
| | |
|
|
Posted Aug 6, 2009 by Mina - Older on the outside, inside still 14
There have been numerous attempts to count active users over the years, but I couldn't even begin to think about where to look for them. Official stats were never divulged.
|
| | |
|
|
Posted Aug 6, 2009 by Nosebagbear (Nbb)
hmm it would be good to know how many h2g2 users have say posted within the last 2 months.
Also why are the h2g2 editors called italics?
|
| | |
|
|
Posted Aug 7, 2009 by Mina - Older on the outside, inside still 14
Because their names are in italics.
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
Key |  |  |
A: An older reply to the parent Posting
B: The parent Posting, to which this is a reply
C: A newer reply to the parent posting
D: The first reply to this Posting
| | |
Click on this icon to make a complaint about a specific Posting | |
Home
Reply
