BBC Home

Explore the BBC

h2g2
20th December 2009
Accessibility help
Text only

.

Conversation Forum


SEARCH h2g2
Edited Entries only
Search h2g2Advanced Search


New visitors: Create your membership
Returning members: Sign in
BBC Homepage
The Guide to Life, The Universe and Everything.

This is the Conversation Forum for Logical Completeness
Contact Us


Like this page?
Send it to a friend!

 
Conversation list
<< Wrong paradox
Russell and Whitehead >>

something sort of interesting
Post: 1
Posted Jan 23, 2001 by Wayfarer -MadForumArtist, Keeper of bad puns, Greeblet with Goo beret, Tangential One
there is no fraction for .9 repeating (that's .9999999999999999999999999999999999999999....... and so on forever)

Reply 

No Previous PostNext Post
Click to Make a Complaint
The Parent Posting, to Which This is a Reply
An Older Reply to the Parent PostingThis PostingA Newer Reply to the Parent Posting
The First Reply to This Posting

something sort of interesting
Post: 2
Posted Jan 24, 2001 by Decaf Silicon
Our math class keeps that as a running joke, as we've been told that .9 repeating = 1, through some formula, since it's 9/9. (5/9=.55555..., etc)

In a way, it does equal 1, as it's infinitely near 1.

-- Dmitri

Reply 

Previous PostNext Post
Click to Make a Complaint
The Parent Posting, to Which This is a Reply
An Older Reply to the Parent PostingThis PostingA Newer Reply to the Parent Posting
The First Reply to This Posting

something sort of interesting
Post: 3
Posted Jan 24, 2001 by HenryS
I *does* equal one.

To prove it properly, you need to write 0.999999... as an infinite sum of the form:

Sum(n=1 to oo) { 9*(10)^(-n) }

then show that this sum converges to 1. But you need first year undergraduate mathematics to do that.

Reply 

Previous PostNext Post
Click to Make a Complaint
The Parent Posting, to Which This is a Reply
An Older Reply to the Parent PostingThis PostingA Newer Reply to the Parent Posting
The First Reply to This Posting

something sort of interesting
Post: 4
Posted Jan 24, 2001 by Wayfarer -MadForumArtist, Keeper of bad puns, Greeblet with Goo beret, Tangential One
really? you do? i have used that formula in class before, but i wasn't a graduate anything then. it is near enough to one as makes no difference, but it isn't, quite. i think its 1-(.000......1(zero repeating with a one after all the zeros which is as close as you can get to zero and still not be))

Reply 

Previous PostNext Post
Click to Make a Complaint
The Parent Posting, to Which This is a Reply
An Older Reply to the Parent PostingThis PostingA Newer Reply to the Parent Posting
The First Reply to This Posting

something sort of interesting
Post: 5
Posted Jan 25, 2001 by HenryS
Well, you need the university maths to define precisely what 'converges' means. Intuitively yes, it keeps getting nearer to 1, but thats not enough to be sure.

"1-(.000......1(zero repeating with a one after all the zeros which is as close as you can get to zero and still not be))"

This isnt a number. There is no place to put that one after all the zeros, because the zeros never end.

Reply 

Previous PostNext Post
Click to Make a Complaint
The Parent Posting, to Which This is a Reply
An Older Reply to the Parent PostingThis PostingA Newer Reply to the Parent Posting
The First Reply to This Posting

something sort of interesting
Post: 6
Posted May 31, 2001 by DMarsh3000
x = 0.99999...
10x = 9.99999...

Subtracting equations, 9x = 9

So x = 1, that is, 0.9999... = 1.

DM

Reply 

Previous PostNext Post
Click to Make a Complaint
The Parent Posting, to Which This is a Reply
An Older Reply to the Parent PostingThis PostingA Newer Reply to the Parent Posting
The First Reply to This Posting

something sort of interesting
Post: 7
Posted Jun 4, 2001 by Researcher 178849
This discussion lacks a definition of what is meant by writing 0.999... One cannot just use symbols arbitarily.


Reply 

Previous PostNext Post
Click to Make a Complaint
The Parent Posting, to Which This is a Reply
An Older Reply to the Parent PostingThis PostingA Newer Reply to the Parent Posting
The First Reply to This Posting

something sort of interesting
Post: 8
Posted Jun 10, 2001 by HenryS
I'm assuming 0.999,,,, means:

sum from i = 1 to infinity of 9/(10^i)

With that definition its possible to show this sum converges to 1.

Reply 

Previous PostNo Next Post
Click to Make a Complaint
The Parent Posting, to Which This is a Reply
An Older Reply to the Parent PostingThis PostingA Newer Reply to the Parent Posting
The First Reply to This Posting

Key
Navigation Example
A: An older reply to the parent Posting
B: The parent Posting, to which this is a reply
C: A newer reply to the parent posting
D: The first reply to this Posting
Click to Make a Complaint
 Click on this icon to make a complaint about a specific Posting
Conversation list
<< Wrong paradox
Russell and Whitehead >>






Disclaimer

Most of the content on h2g2 is created by h2g2's Researchers, who are members of the public. The views expressed are theirs and unless specifically stated are not those of the BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of any external sites referenced. In the event that you consider anything on this page to be in breach of the site's House Rules, please click here. For any other comments, please click on the Feedback button above.




About the BBC | Help | Terms of Use | Privacy & Cookies Policy