BBC Home

Explore the BBC

h2g2
7th January 2010
Accessibility help
Text only

.

Conversation Forum


SEARCH h2g2
Edited Entries only
Search h2g2Advanced Search


New visitors: Create your membership
Returning members: Sign in
BBC Homepage
The Guide to Life, The Universe and Everything.

This is the Conversation Forum for Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle
Contact Us


Like this page?
Send it to a friend!

 
Conversation list
<< Heisenberg's uncertainty principle
You don't know >>

Star Trek beaming problem
Post: 1
Posted Aug 9, 2000 by Jacksrevenge
Did you know that they installed 'Heisenberg compensators' in the Star Trek series because the principle would otherwise beaming impossible. This resulted in the following dialogue.


Scientific advisor tells journalist about the Heisenberg compensator.

Journalist: Well, how does it work?

SA: Very well, thanks. winkeye

Reply 

No Previous PostNext Post
Click to Make a Complaint
The Parent Posting, to Which This is a Reply
An Older Reply to the Parent PostingThis PostingA Newer Reply to the Parent Posting
The First Reply to This Posting

Star Trek beaming problem
Post: 2
Posted Aug 21, 2000 by CyberPope
As it turns out, the effects of the interactions subatomic particles have with each other theoretically alter the particles before the interaction takes place. So you could gather information about a particle before it interacts with anything, making Star-Trek like transporters possible. Some IBM fellows have done very interesting work in this area, where by "very interesting" I mean "makes-your-head-want-to-explode."

Reply 

Previous PostNext Post
Click to Make a Complaint
The Parent Posting, to Which This is a Reply
An Older Reply to the Parent PostingThis PostingA Newer Reply to the Parent Posting
The First Reply to This Posting

Star Trek beaming problem
Post: 3
Posted Aug 23, 2000 by Brussels Sprout
Does this bizarre head-exploding stuff from IBM have anything to do with the theory surrounding use of identical (down to subatomic level) crystals for instantaneous communication independent of the speed of light?

[In case this one is new to you, the idea is that one of these crystals - made from dunnowhatium - will exhibit a response to a stimuli applied to the other instantly, and regardless of the distance between the two crystals].

Note new element name made up on the spot.

Reply 

Previous PostNext Post
Click to Make a Complaint
The Parent Posting, to Which This is a Reply
An Older Reply to the Parent PostingThis PostingA Newer Reply to the Parent Posting
The First Reply to This Posting

Star Trek beaming problem
Post: 4
Posted Aug 28, 2000 by Sho (I can't be asked)
not sure you spelt it correctly. What's it's symbol? winkeye

Reply 

Previous PostNext Post
Click to Make a Complaint
The Parent Posting, to Which This is a Reply
An Older Reply to the Parent PostingThis PostingA Newer Reply to the Parent Posting
The First Reply to This Posting

Star Trek beaming problem
Post: 5
Posted Jan 23, 2004 by ThinkSoft --==Death to Homework==--
Read something yesterday in an article about quantum computing involving quarks have the same 'property' (I think that was it)... About teleporting photons, I wish I understood more of this!

Reply 

Previous PostNext Post
Click to Make a Complaint
The Parent Posting, to Which This is a Reply
An Older Reply to the Parent PostingThis PostingA Newer Reply to the Parent Posting
The First Reply to This Posting

Star Trek beaming problem
Post: 6
Posted May 31, 2004 by marshman
I think what you are referring to is Quantum Entanglement, which even Einstein thought of as a most spooky result of quantum maths. Basically, two 'entangled' particles will exhibit the same spin, velocity, and charge, and one will change its condition to mimic the other instantaeneously, irrespective of distance. And yes, there have been experiments (I have the refs somewhere, but please dont ask me to look them up) in which entangled particles have been used to transmit data across empty space (the affected particle being the 'transmitter', and its entangled twin being the 'receiver.') If anyone else has more info, please share.erm

Reply 

Previous PostNo Next Post
Click to Make a Complaint
The Parent Posting, to Which This is a Reply
An Older Reply to the Parent PostingThis PostingA Newer Reply to the Parent Posting
The First Reply to This Posting

Key
Navigation Example
A: An older reply to the parent Posting
B: The parent Posting, to which this is a reply
C: A newer reply to the parent posting
D: The first reply to this Posting
Click to Make a Complaint
 Click on this icon to make a complaint about a specific Posting
Conversation list
<< Heisenberg's uncertainty principle
You don't know >>






Disclaimer

Most of the content on h2g2 is created by h2g2's Researchers, who are members of the public. The views expressed are theirs and unless specifically stated are not those of the BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of any external sites referenced. In the event that you consider anything on this page to be in breach of the site's House Rules, please click here. For any other comments, please click on the Feedback button above.




About the BBC | Help | Terms of Use | Privacy & Cookies Policy