Posted Jun 28, 2009 by Malabarista - any plan where you dismantle the protocol binders and make silly hats is a good plan!
I'm working on a University project about Buckminster Fuller. He's a visionary architect/engineer - so would that go in the science or the arts department?
|
 
|  | |
|
|
Posted Jul 1, 2009 by Rich [?] - Cavaliers Batsman of the Year 2009!
I don't think those distinctions matter very much. The idea was that those of us who were scientists would subscribe to that part part of the University and so on, but I don't think that's actually happened. I'd love to be proved wrong, but I don't think anyone pays much attention to Uni projects until they're in PR anyway...
|
| | |
|
|
Posted Jul 2, 2009 by echomikeromeo
For pedantry's sake, I'd weigh in on the "science" side, but Rich is very sensible, so listen to him.
|
| | |
|
|
Posted Jul 2, 2009 by Rich [?] - Cavaliers Batsman of the Year 2009!
Don't mind if I quote you on the second half of that sentence, do you? 
|
| | |
|
|
Posted Jul 2, 2009 by echomikeromeo
Oh, please do!
|
| | |
|
|
Posted Jul 2, 2009 by Malabarista - any plan where you dismantle the protocol binders and make silly hats is a good plan!
 Science it is. I've never understood architecture as a mere art, anyway 
( Rich! Sensible!)
|
| | |
|
|
Posted Nov 3, 2009 by Rich [?] - Cavaliers Batsman of the Year 2009!
I've just incorprated both EMR and Mal's comments into the top of my PS. They make a very pleasing pyramid effect with Leo's comment above.
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
Key |  |  |
A: An older reply to the parent Posting
B: The parent Posting, to which this is a reply
C: A newer reply to the parent posting
D: The first reply to this Posting
| | |
Click on this icon to make a complaint about a specific Posting | |
Home
Reply
