Posted Dec 11, 2002 by Colonel creachy - I like SPAM!!!
SINCE THE RELEASE OF NIRVANA (GREATEST HITS) AND THE SUBSEQUENT GRUNGE RE-REVOLUTION, I HAVE COME ACROSS MANY CRITICISMS OF NOT JUST THE BAND AND THEIR MUSIC BUT ALSO OF COBAIN HIMSELF. SOME HAVE DONE WELL TO JUSTIFY THEIR CHEAP SHOTS AT WHAT IS UNDOUBTEDLY THE MOST INFLUENTIAL BAND SINCE THE WHO! THERE ARE, I CONCEDE, STRONG ARGUMENTS THAT GO IN FAVOUR OF BANDS SUCH AS THE PIXIES AND MUDHONEYS, BUT , AND CORRECT ME IF I AM WRONG, WERE THESE BANDS EVER AS BIG AS NIRVANA? I AM NOT TRYING TO PUT THEM DOWN AS I HAVE HEARD THEIR MUSIC AND QUITE ENJOY IT BUT ALL THEY WERE WERE MENTIONS IN INTERVIEWS WITH KURT!
THE WORST ARGUMENT I SAW WAS 'COBAIN V'S GROHL'. AND AS I PROCEEDED TO SEE THAT ARGUMENT WAS QUICKLY RESOLVED!
WHAT I AM TRYING TO SAY IS CAN PEOPLE NOT JUST LISTEN TO WHAT HAS ALREADY BEEN ESTABLISHED AS A GREAT AND UNFORGETTABLE BAND WITHOUT GETTING ON THEIR HIGH-HORSE AND THUS FORCING ME TO MOUNT MINE!
|
 
|  | |
|
|
Posted Apr 7, 2004 by deadfish (going with the flow)
damn right!
|
| | |
|
|
Posted Apr 11, 2004 by Green Machine
"Were these Bands Ever as big As Nirvana?" or summit like that. I dont think you can measure the quality of a band by how "big" it was / is. not saying that nirvana are bad tho.
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
Key |  |  |
A: An older reply to the parent Posting
B: The parent Posting, to which this is a reply
C: A newer reply to the parent posting
D: The first reply to this Posting
| | |
Click on this icon to make a complaint about a specific Posting | |
Home
Reply
