Posted Feb 26, 2003 by Researcher 220379
The original source for the theory came from 'Life' magazine and the issue (Oh how I wish I'd kept it!!) contained much more empirical evidence, such as the voice print, a voice print is as unique as a fingerprint, and it was shown that the voiceprint of Paul's voice taken from tracks at the time of the article was different from the 'pre-death' tracks.
The Beatles had a sense of humour that was likely to result in 'clues' to play along with the theory, so all of the lyric and album clues are suspect, but not the voice print clue (if it was geniune)
|
 
|  | |
|
|
Posted Apr 1, 2003 by Researcher 224002
It has been shown recently that fingerprints are not as unique as first thought. Could it be possible that voice prints are going to end up the same and not be unique.
Other than that, the arguements for an against Sir Paul being an imposter are very compelling.
|
 
| | |
|
|
|
|
Key |  |  |
A: An older reply to the parent Posting
B: The parent Posting, to which this is a reply
C: A newer reply to the parent posting
D: The first reply to this Posting
| | |
Click on this icon to make a complaint about a specific Posting | |
Home
Reply
