BBC Home

Explore the BBC

h2g2
15th December 2009
Accessibility help
Text only

.

Conversation Forum


SEARCH h2g2
Edited Entries only
Search h2g2Advanced Search


New visitors: Create your membership
Returning members: Sign in
BBC Homepage
The Guide to Life, The Universe and Everything.

This is the Conversation Forum for Pi
Contact Us


Like this page?
Send it to a friend!

 
Conversation list
<< i learned 220 digits of pi
Pi - The film >>

A quick and dirty approximation
Post: 1
Posted Aug 10, 2002 by Gordon, Ringer of Bells, Keeper of Postal Codes and Maps No One Can Re-fold Properly
If you need to very quickly calculate pi to a few decimal places, you can use 22/7 to two significant decimal places. smiley

Reply 

No Previous PostNext Post
Click to Make a Complaint
The Parent Posting, to Which This is a Reply
An Older Reply to the Parent PostingThis PostingA Newer Reply to the Parent Posting
The First Reply to This Posting

A quick and dirty approximation
Post: 2
Posted Aug 29, 2002 by Sir Doug
Another fine approximation can be obtain by taking the first three odd digits and doubling them, like so:
1 1 3 3 5 5
Then, put the last three over the first:
355 / 113
This gives 3.14159..., six accurate decimals of pi.

Reply 

Previous PostNext Post
Click to Make a Complaint
The Parent Posting, to Which This is a Reply
An Older Reply to the Parent PostingThis PostingA Newer Reply to the Parent Posting
The First Reply to This Posting

A quick and dirty approximation
Post: 3
Posted Sep 12, 2002 by Uncle Ghengis
I always use the mnemonic "how I wish I could remember pi" - counting the number of digits in each word gives: "3 1 4 1 5 8 2".


Reply 

Previous PostNext Post
Click to Make a Complaint
The Parent Posting, to Which This is a Reply
An Older Reply to the Parent PostingThis PostingA Newer Reply to the Parent Posting
The First Reply to This Posting

A quick and dirty approximation
Post: 4
Posted Nov 11, 2002 by Redfax
words have letters, not digits....smiley

Reply 

Previous PostNext Post
Click to Make a Complaint
The Parent Posting, to Which This is a Reply
An Older Reply to the Parent PostingThis PostingA Newer Reply to the Parent Posting
The First Reply to This Posting

A quick and dirty approximation
Post: 5
Posted Nov 12, 2002 by Uncle Ghengis
Ah yes. Lets say "characters", then shall we?



Reply 

Previous PostNo Next Post
Click to Make a Complaint
The Parent Posting, to Which This is a Reply
An Older Reply to the Parent PostingThis PostingA Newer Reply to the Parent Posting
The First Reply to This Posting

Key
Navigation Example
A: An older reply to the parent Posting
B: The parent Posting, to which this is a reply
C: A newer reply to the parent posting
D: The first reply to this Posting
Click to Make a Complaint
 Click on this icon to make a complaint about a specific Posting
Conversation list
<< i learned 220 digits of pi
Pi - The film >>






Disclaimer

Most of the content on h2g2 is created by h2g2's Researchers, who are members of the public. The views expressed are theirs and unless specifically stated are not those of the BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of any external sites referenced. In the event that you consider anything on this page to be in breach of the site's House Rules, please click here. For any other comments, please click on the Feedback button above.




About the BBC | Help | Terms of Use | Privacy & Cookies Policy