BBC Home

Explore the BBC

h2g2
25th December 2009
Accessibility help
Text only

.

Conversation Forum


SEARCH h2g2
Edited Entries only
Search h2g2Advanced Search


New visitors: Create your membership
Returning members: Sign in
BBC Homepage
The Guide to Life, The Universe and Everything.

This is the Conversation Forum for Intervention in Somalia (1992 - 1995)
Contact Us


Like this page?
Send it to a friend!

 
Conversation list
Peacekeeping? >>

A little too much of a U.S. focus?
Post: 1
Posted Nov 16, 2005 by kitboyes
Great to see an article about this. ok

The one gripe I'd have was it seems to concentrate on the U.S. without much attention or even recognition of the fact UN forces in Somalia were not all American - albeit that the US largely instigated the depolyment and non-UN military interventions by a (non UN) US force, culminating in the Day of the Rangers/Blackhawk Down/Battle of Mogadishu debacle was very important in the eventual outcome. And for that matter in 1994 a UAE officer is quoted as saying "Like the Gulf War, this is an American operation all the way down. I'm ashamed to be here. But I have no choice. Of course, I'm not going to argue with anybody. But I will not shoot anyone. These people are my brothers and sisters". (The not very reputable source is http://www.peacemagazine.org/archive/v10n2p06.htm).

As a New Zealander, I'd quite understand if the small contribution of the RNZAF's Andovers was over looked, and our ambassador leading the mission that recomended withdrawal was over looked, (and positively delighted if the role of the Long Range Desert Group in inspiring Somalian "Technical"s was forgotten erm ). I'm sure Canada will be ever keener for the arrest of 6 of its soldiers to be forgotten.

However I imagine some other nations - especially those who rescued the surrounded American force from its own incompetence might be a little miffed at their lack of recognition. UNITAF had 24,000 U.S. troops and another 13,000 from other countries. By the time of UNOSOM II there were 17,700 troops in the United States Joint Task Force in Somalia - not under UN control. UNOSOM II had a strength of 28,000, (plus 2,000 odd civilians). As well as the U.S. it was drawn from Australia, Austria, Bangladesh, Belgium, Botswana, Canada, Czechoslovakia, Egypt, Fiji, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, India, Indonesia, Ireland, Italy, Kuwait, Jordan, Malaysia, Morocco, Nepal, New Zealand, Nigeria, Norway, Pakistan, the Republic of Korea, Romania, Saudi Arabia, Sweden, Tunisia, Turkey, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and Zimbabwe. Only Sweden, Belgium and France withdrew their 2,200 troops before the U.S. abandoned Somalia. - the other nations maintained a presence for a further year until the UN withdrew.

Hope that helps the U.S. in its attempts to share the blame around winkeye .

The U.N.s version of history can be seen at
http://www.un.org/Depts/DPKO/Missions/unosomi.htm
http://www.un.org/Depts/DPKO/Missions/unosom2b.htm.

Cheers ok



Reply 

No Previous PostNext Post
Click to Make a Complaint
The Parent Posting, to Which This is a Reply
An Older Reply to the Parent PostingThis PostingA Newer Reply to the Parent Posting
The First Reply to This Posting

A little too much of a U.S. focus?
Post: 2
Posted Nov 17, 2005 by John the gardener says, "Free Tibet!"
Thanks for the added info. That's a fair criticism. I did take a pretty narrow view of the affair. There's just enough info there to justify my rant I think. winkeye

JTG cheers

Reply 

Previous PostNo Next Post
Click to Make a Complaint
The Parent Posting, to Which This is a Reply
An Older Reply to the Parent PostingThis PostingA Newer Reply to the Parent Posting
The First Reply to This Posting

Key
Navigation Example
A: An older reply to the parent Posting
B: The parent Posting, to which this is a reply
C: A newer reply to the parent posting
D: The first reply to this Posting
Click to Make a Complaint
 Click on this icon to make a complaint about a specific Posting
Conversation list
Peacekeeping? >>






Disclaimer

Most of the content on h2g2 is created by h2g2's Researchers, who are members of the public. The views expressed are theirs and unless specifically stated are not those of the BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of any external sites referenced. In the event that you consider anything on this page to be in breach of the site's House Rules, please click here. For any other comments, please click on the Feedback button above.




About the BBC | Help | Terms of Use | Privacy & Cookies Policy