BBC Home

Explore the BBC

h2g2
1st January 2010
Accessibility help
Text only

.

Conversation Forum


SEARCH h2g2
Edited Entries only
Search h2g2Advanced Search


New visitors: Create your membership
Returning members: Sign in
BBC Homepage
The Guide to Life, The Universe and Everything.

This is the Conversation Forum for Wikipedia
Contact Us


Like this page?
Send it to a friend!

 
Conversation list
How to measure Wikipedia's success. >>

Wikipedia HUAMN sources Info incorrect, etc
Post: 1
Posted Sep 18, 2005 by doctorTreborM

The very Idea that ANY humans have been made from Simeon stem cells is ludicrous.
The many LIFE destructions info is quite good but too general. There is NO mention of the exact
time intervals this can or DID happen as the populations of Earth have ONLY a 26000 year existence
before a 3 day dakness reduces the ambient Temperature of Earth to minus 185 degrees celcius via a SUN blackout by the regular visits of NEMISIS; Our Binary Star ( many problems here over 92 millions of years and more! ( See curves on Google)

It's about time that the EARTH denizens realized the reality of XTRA Terresrial input as well. In the vastness of the Universe we are NOT alone as actually we have many thousands of types of "neighbors" in different constellations. The Saucer crashes at Roswell are moot evidence of this. The Lyran Federation is IN our skies as I write and HAVE been since 1884. They have boosred out technology so that we might eventually attain SPACE travel ourselves. However the "powers that be" have fought this tooth and nail!

The World would have ended in 2011 had not our SUM been "Harvested" in 1997 and made into a NEW Hydrogen Star wthout Helium This situation is stabalized by adjacent small neutron stars with neutron collectors through a purpsely made FLUX from the SUN itself. Any Good Telescope with a secondary imaging sceen can see this! The SUN instead of swelling in 2011 to 2015 has now been expended to 3034/ ( AN extar 1000 yrs) Revelations anyone??

I have been an Arospace Consulting Engineer since 1962 and have seen ALL the "changes that have taken place! Starting in 1962, oue SUN went "half life" and lost its equator. Sky Lab was hurriedly made
to watch the phenomenon! In the first 4 days of Sept of 1991, Our SUN turned into an HELIUM Star,
still sans an equator. In Nov of 1997 the SUN again went through an ENGINEERED change and was MADE into an HYDROGEN star and, as well regained her equatorial balance. At the time, a ion FLUX exit
was created ad three HUGE tanks were placed in close orbit to collect Neutrons to keep the Hydrogen balance. Again in 2003, August 03, two small Neutron stars replaced the ytanks and now are keeping the balance by collecting IONS from the flux mentioned. This will have stabalized the SUN-Star until about summer 3034 when our SUN will bid Goodbye and the Entire Soalr system will become giant Iceburgs.
We have until then to settle our differences as Humans and becme ONE civilization dedicated to finding a NEW home around a YOUNG star somewhwre in our dying Galaxy! ( Or be helped from our young next door neighboring Galaxy in findig or being given a NEW planet upon which to LIVE in PEACE! What w do NOW will determine the outcome then! Massive Earth shaking catastrophe's are about to happen starting in Jue or July of 2011...a scant 6 yrs away! If you wish details I can also supply same! Dr, RLM Ph.D /akaB-0b1



Reply 

No Previous PostNext Post
Click to Make a Complaint
The Parent Posting, to Which This is a Reply
An Older Reply to the Parent PostingThis PostingA Newer Reply to the Parent Posting
The First Reply to This Posting

Wikipedia HUAMN sources Info incorrect, etc
Post: 2
Posted Sep 18, 2005 by Gnomon [See A60420098 for details of new sign-in system]
If you don't like what's in Wikipedia, please change it. Don't grumble about it here.

Reply 

Previous PostNext Post
Click to Make a Complaint
The Parent Posting, to Which This is a Reply
An Older Reply to the Parent PostingThis PostingA Newer Reply to the Parent Posting
The First Reply to This Posting

Wikipedia HUAMN sources Info incorrect, etc
Post: 3
Posted 2 Days Ago by Alex 'Tufty' Ashman [!]

Somehow, I don't think wikipedia would welcome the above. laugh

Reply 

Previous PostNext Post
Click to Make a Complaint
The Parent Posting, to Which This is a Reply
An Older Reply to the Parent PostingThis PostingA Newer Reply to the Parent Posting
The First Reply to This Posting

Wikipedia HUAMN sources Info incorrect, etc
Post: 4
Posted Yesterday by Gnomon [See A60420098 for details of new sign-in system]
biggrin


Reply 

Previous PostNext Post
Click to Make a Complaint
The Parent Posting, to Which This is a Reply
An Older Reply to the Parent PostingThis PostingA Newer Reply to the Parent Posting
The First Reply to This Posting

Wikipedia HUAMN sources Info incorrect, etc
Post: 5
Posted Yesterday by Online NowEEGOGEE---formerly-Julzes-Yroix----name from number 3360633---original-name-from-July-zero-six
That must have been a joke.

Reply 

Previous PostNext Post
Click to Make a Complaint
The Parent Posting, to Which This is a Reply
An Older Reply to the Parent PostingThis PostingA Newer Reply to the Parent Posting
The First Reply to This Posting

Wikipedia HUAMN sources Info incorrect, etc
Post: 6
Posted Yesterday by Gnomon [See A60420098 for details of new sign-in system]
It doesn't look like a joke to me.

Reply 

Previous PostNext Post
Click to Make a Complaint
The Parent Posting, to Which This is a Reply
An Older Reply to the Parent PostingThis PostingA Newer Reply to the Parent Posting
The First Reply to This Posting

Wikipedia HUAMN sources Info incorrect, etc
Post: 7
Posted Yesterday by Online NowEEGOGEE---formerly-Julzes-Yroix----name from number 3360633---original-name-from-July-zero-six
Well, it's a pretty pathetic attempt at disinformation, if not a joke. I'd say that in the writer's mind it may have been both, but he vanished. Could have been dementia of some sort, I suppose.

Reply 

Previous PostNext Post
Click to Make a Complaint
The Parent Posting, to Which This is a Reply
An Older Reply to the Parent PostingThis PostingA Newer Reply to the Parent Posting
The First Reply to This Posting

Wikipedia HUAMN sources Info incorrect, etc
Post: 8
Posted Yesterday by Gnomon [See A60420098 for details of new sign-in system]
It was an attempt to reveal the truth, because he's not allowed to publish stuff like that on Wikipedia, and anybody can put any old rubbish here as long as it is not defamatory.

Reply 

Previous PostNo Next Post
Click to Make a Complaint
The Parent Posting, to Which This is a Reply
An Older Reply to the Parent PostingThis PostingA Newer Reply to the Parent Posting
The First Reply to This Posting

Key
Navigation Example
A: An older reply to the parent Posting
B: The parent Posting, to which this is a reply
C: A newer reply to the parent posting
D: The first reply to this Posting
Click to Make a Complaint
 Click on this icon to make a complaint about a specific Posting
Conversation list
How to measure Wikipedia's success. >>






Disclaimer

Most of the content on h2g2 is created by h2g2's Researchers, who are members of the public. The views expressed are theirs and unless specifically stated are not those of the BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of any external sites referenced. In the event that you consider anything on this page to be in breach of the site's House Rules, please click here. For any other comments, please click on the Feedback button above.




About the BBC | Help | Terms of Use | Privacy & Cookies Policy