BBC Home

Explore the BBC

h2g2
29th December 2009
Accessibility help
Text only

.

Conversation Forum


SEARCH h2g2
Edited Entries only
Search h2g2Advanced Search


New visitors: Create your membership
Returning members: Sign in
BBC Homepage
The Guide to Life, The Universe and Everything.

This is the Conversation Forum for Recording Techniques - Digital versus Analogue
Contact Us


Like this page?
Send it to a friend!

 
Conversation list
<< dynamic range
There are 10 types of people... >>

Sampling Frequency
Post: 1
Posted Jan 8, 2003 by manolan

I thought the sampling frequency of CD audio was 44.1kHz, not 41kHz.

Also, in the section "Bits and Pieces", you refer to 4-bit encryption, whereas what you're referring to is 4-bit encoding.



Reply 

No Previous PostNext Post
Click to Make a Complaint
The Parent Posting, to Which This is a Reply
An Older Reply to the Parent PostingThis PostingA Newer Reply to the Parent Posting
The First Reply to This Posting

Sampling Frequency
Post: 2
Posted Jan 8, 2003 by manolan

Oh, and of course, DAT has a different sampling frequency (48kHz).

Reply 

Previous PostNext Post
Click to Make a Complaint
The Parent Posting, to Which This is a Reply
An Older Reply to the Parent PostingThis PostingA Newer Reply to the Parent Posting
The First Reply to This Posting

Sampling Frequency
Post: 3
Posted Jan 8, 2003 by Jose Minge, Chair and Keeper of The Imperial Deafness, don't you know.
OK, I originally put encoding, but was told by the author of Fourier analysis entry that this was the wrong terminology to use. As for the mistake to do with CD sampling rate I don't have an answer, it was probably my mistake not the editors though.

48kHz is used by both DAT and some MIDI programs. It gives more clarity but takes more space to store than 44.1kHz. DAT has better clarity, but as you are still relying on a mechanical process you still get some noise from the DAT machine this' and because they are quite annoying to use (apparently), is why they have been superceded by CD and mini disc.

Reply 

Previous PostNext Post
Click to Make a Complaint
The Parent Posting, to Which This is a Reply
An Older Reply to the Parent PostingThis PostingA Newer Reply to the Parent Posting
The First Reply to This Posting

Sampling Frequency
Post: 4
Posted Jan 8, 2003 by GTBacchus
so, um.... is there anything in here that needs to change?

Reply 

Previous PostNext Post
Click to Make a Complaint
The Parent Posting, to Which This is a Reply
An Older Reply to the Parent PostingThis PostingA Newer Reply to the Parent Posting
The First Reply to This Posting

Sampling Frequency
Post: 5
Posted Jan 8, 2003 by Jose Minge, Chair and Keeper of The Imperial Deafness, don't you know.
Yes, erm my fault entirely I should have proof read, bugger. Where it says (something like) 'CD's use 16 bit encryption and a sampling rate of 41000Hz' it should be 44100 Hz instead. Sorry.

Reply 

Previous PostNext Post
Click to Make a Complaint
The Parent Posting, to Which This is a Reply
An Older Reply to the Parent PostingThis PostingA Newer Reply to the Parent Posting
The First Reply to This Posting

Sampling Frequency
Post: 6
Posted Jan 8, 2003 by Jose Minge, Chair and Keeper of The Imperial Deafness, don't you know.
How Digital Audio Is Recorded

This is going to be quite hard to explain, but here goes!

Digital audio works by sampling sound into binary code. To save space and simplify the process the sound is usually encoded into 16-bit PCM (pulse code modulation) and sampled at 41,000Hz. This is the configuration most commonly used for compact discs.


Should be:

How Digital Audio Is Recorded

This is going to be quite hard to explain, but here goes!

Digital audio works by sampling sound into binary code. To save space and simplify the process the sound is usually encoded into 16-bit PCM (pulse code modulation) and sampled at 44,100Hz. This is the configuration most commonly used for compact discs.


Reply 

Previous PostNext Post
Click to Make a Complaint
The Parent Posting, to Which This is a Reply
An Older Reply to the Parent PostingThis PostingA Newer Reply to the Parent Posting
The First Reply to This Posting

Sampling Frequency
Post: 7
Posted Jan 9, 2003 by Potholer
While you're at it, the ' 220,500Hz ' in the 'How digital audio is recorded' section looks suspect.
I *guess* it was meant to be 22,050 or thereabouts (ie half the CD sampling rate of 44.1KHz)?

Reply 

Previous PostNext Post
Click to Make a Complaint
The Parent Posting, to Which This is a Reply
An Older Reply to the Parent PostingThis PostingA Newer Reply to the Parent Posting
The First Reply to This Posting

Sampling Frequency
Post: 8
Posted Jan 9, 2003 by World Service Memoryshare team
OK Jose Minge, I've done that change ok Thanks for clearing it up.

Potholer, you sound like you know what you're talking about... Jose Minge, do you want to confirm?

smiley

Anna



Reply 

Previous PostNext Post
Click to Make a Complaint
The Parent Posting, to Which This is a Reply
An Older Reply to the Parent PostingThis PostingA Newer Reply to the Parent Posting
The First Reply to This Posting

Sampling Frequency
Post: 9
Posted Jan 9, 2003 by GTBacchus
Hi Anna, good morning! smiley

Thanks for helping out with this... there's actually another spot where the incorrect 41,000 number shows up. Under the header "Which is Better?", in the first paragraph, there's the parenthetical: "(1/41,000th of a second)". That should be "(1/44,100th of a second)".

Reply 

Previous PostNext Post
Click to Make a Complaint
The Parent Posting, to Which This is a Reply
An Older Reply to the Parent PostingThis PostingA Newer Reply to the Parent Posting
The First Reply to This Posting

Sampling Frequency
Post: 10
Posted Jan 9, 2003 by World Service Memoryshare team
Morning to you GTB!

Is done smiley

Anna

Reply 

Previous PostNext Post
Click to Make a Complaint
The Parent Posting, to Which This is a Reply
An Older Reply to the Parent PostingThis PostingA Newer Reply to the Parent Posting
The First Reply to This Posting

Sampling Frequency
Post: 11
Posted Jan 9, 2003 by Jose Minge, Chair and Keeper of The Imperial Deafness, don't you know.
Yes thankyou, sorry should proof read stuff.

Reply 

Previous PostNext Post
Click to Make a Complaint
The Parent Posting, to Which This is a Reply
An Older Reply to the Parent PostingThis PostingA Newer Reply to the Parent Posting
The First Reply to This Posting

Sampling Frequency
Post: 12
Posted Jan 9, 2003 by GTBacchus
Say Jose, how about the 220,500 that Potholer mentioned in post 7?

Reply 

Previous PostNext Post
Click to Make a Complaint
The Parent Posting, to Which This is a Reply
An Older Reply to the Parent PostingThis PostingA Newer Reply to the Parent Posting
The First Reply to This Posting

Sampling Frequency
Post: 13
Posted Jan 9, 2003 by Jose Minge, Chair and Keeper of The Imperial Deafness, don't you know.
Potholer is correct, the 22,050 Hz is half CD sampling rate. THis is correct.

Reply 

Previous PostNo Next Post
Click to Make a Complaint
The Parent Posting, to Which This is a Reply
An Older Reply to the Parent PostingThis PostingA Newer Reply to the Parent Posting
The First Reply to This Posting

Key
Navigation Example
A: An older reply to the parent Posting
B: The parent Posting, to which this is a reply
C: A newer reply to the parent posting
D: The first reply to this Posting
Click to Make a Complaint
 Click on this icon to make a complaint about a specific Posting
Conversation list
<< dynamic range
There are 10 types of people... >>






Disclaimer

Most of the content on h2g2 is created by h2g2's Researchers, who are members of the public. The views expressed are theirs and unless specifically stated are not those of the BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of any external sites referenced. In the event that you consider anything on this page to be in breach of the site's House Rules, please click here. For any other comments, please click on the Feedback button above.




About the BBC | Help | Terms of Use | Privacy & Cookies Policy