Message 1 - posted by U6532874, Mar 2, 2007
Silly or Sensible? Part of a continuing Establishment conspiracy?
Very bright and independent senior judge Butler-Sloss decided not to have a jury because she felt that the families and public needed an objective unemotional closely reasoned analytical written judgement on the evidence which she correctly and candidly considered would be impossible for a lay jury to acheive. Now the High Court has overturned her and it seems that the only opinion the public will get from this inquest will be a one or two word finding.This will give no one a conclusive answer to anything.