BBC Home

Explore the BBC

19th October 2019
Accessibility help
Text only

BBC Homepage

Channel Islands

Contact Us

Like this page?
Send it to a friend!


or register to join or start a new discussion.


Is it Time for England to be governed by the English?

Messages  21 - 23 of 23

< Previous 1  2  Next >

Message 21 - posted by U3775715 - alt id 1, Jun 29, 2006

If the English were up to it they would take these jobs off the Scots but these things go on merit.
Complain about a message      

Message 22 - posted by pfishwick, Jun 29, 2006

If the English were up to it they would take these jobs off the Scots but these things go on merit.

Quoted from this message

Absolutley Granborough. Too many English commentators complain about the disproportionate influence of Scotland and blame the Scots too readily without asking why more English people aren't in these positions. Any answers folks?

Complain about a message      

Message 23 - posted by EdSomerset, Aug 17, 2006

This is so wrong and old fashioned a view of the country (c1957)it is not worth commenting on, except to say, thatcher and major had no mandate in Scotland and Wales and both areas had essentially a colonial regime. The reason that regionalism is needed in England is because we all commute outside the heritage counties we live in, some things are better delivered on a bigger basis and most importantly, London and the SE economy is out of kilter with the economies of the midlands/the north etc. It should also be noted that the English regions conform roughly to the saxon kingdoms of England rather than the norman french nation that replaced it.

Quoted from this message

I quite agree, a political rebalancing within England would in turn to an economic rebalancing. The trouble is there is opposition to it.

1. It is perceived as an EU plot to destroy England. Claims are made that England isn't on EU regional maps (a la John of Paddington), but the fact that France, Germany, Italy, Spain, etc are also not shown on the maps as nations is ignored.

2. Centuries of centralised rule in England, since the Normans, has led to a wariness when it comes giving autonomy out at regional level. England is the first and last part of the British Empire; the first bit to be conquered and the last to receive proper representation. Unfortunately a lot of people cling to the security that this empire gives them and are comfortable with being run as colonies from Westminster. It's more than likely that a lot of politicians are more than happy to go along with this.

3. Sucessive governments like to curry favour with big business, which is concentrated on London and the SE. Attempts to devolve England politically and economically would take business away from London, so real power is never likely to be devolved down from Westminster. In fact the current proposals involve devolving power upwards from the county councils (thus scrapping them) to large assemblies nearer on the political spectrum to London, but without the power to challenge Westminster.
Complain about a message      
< Previous 1  2  Next >

This discussion is tagged with:
- England
- Northamptonshire
- Scotland
- wales
- devolution

getting involved How to reply to messagespopup icon
complain  Alert us about a messagepopup icon
online safety Are you being safe online?popup icon

Messages  21 - 23 of 23


About the BBC | Help | Terms of Use | Privacy & Cookies Policy