Comments for http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/pm/2011/03/michael_buchanan_in_libya.shtml http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/pm/2011/03/michael_buchanan_in_libya.shtml en-gb 30 Sun 02 Aug 2015 00:01:28 GMT+1 A feed of user comments from the page found at http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/pm/2011/03/michael_buchanan_in_libya.shtml javed_nicholson http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/pm/2011/03/michael_buchanan_in_libya.shtml?page=95#comment20 Troops on the ground are the least of our worries that this stupid death and glory government is heading for. They are committing Libya to a long civil war, if Benghazi does not fall, instead of a truce. And if it falls, apparently we shall be recolonising the country with death squads and special forces helping organise guerrilla war and assassinations. Occupation?? Get a dictionary. It would be British terrorism and anti-democratic at that. Because it won't be the majority Islamists in Libya who are allowed to form a government but a rich pro-Western clique that has recruited sections of the poor to do their dying for them. Pay attention yourself. Ground troops was is what the US, UK and France are including. Nick Clegg will explain they aren't occupying the country. Fri 18 Mar 2011 01:15:14 GMT+1 Sindy http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/pm/2011/03/michael_buchanan_in_libya.shtml?page=90#comment19 19. javed_nicholsonPay attention, Mac - 'Excludes occupation force'. Thu 17 Mar 2011 22:47:20 GMT+1 javed_nicholson http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/pm/2011/03/michael_buchanan_in_libya.shtml?page=85#comment18 An air exclusion? 'All possible measures' to stop civilians being killed? The US, France and the UK say that means ground troops. I'd have thought it meant a Peace Conference and the Gaddafi truce, NOT bombing by the West, nor ground troops nor even an exclusion zone. Thu 17 Mar 2011 22:40:14 GMT+1 Sindy http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/pm/2011/03/michael_buchanan_in_libya.shtml?page=80#comment17 17. P NuttOh sorry, Mr Nutt. [Snigger] Wed 16 Mar 2011 23:18:33 GMT+1 DiY http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/pm/2011/03/michael_buchanan_in_libya.shtml?page=76#comment16 Sheeeesh will you peeps please make your minds up. *flounces off to read The Gruniad* Wed 16 Mar 2011 19:29:09 GMT+1 Sindy http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/pm/2011/03/michael_buchanan_in_libya.shtml?page=71#comment15 15: Perhaps more appropriate on this thread? Wed 16 Mar 2011 17:51:06 GMT+1 DiY http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/pm/2011/03/michael_buchanan_in_libya.shtml?page=66#comment14 ....and another tragedy unfolds. Wed 16 Mar 2011 14:54:28 GMT+1 Big Sister http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/pm/2011/03/michael_buchanan_in_libya.shtml?page=61#comment13 Yes, I noticed that, too, Anne. Tue 15 Mar 2011 11:24:09 GMT+1 Anne P http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/pm/2011/03/michael_buchanan_in_libya.shtml?page=57#comment12 Without the additional comments on mac's id a chance reader might wonder whether the numbering system had gone mad. Complete removal of postings and their numbers is relatively new? Tue 15 Mar 2011 11:10:48 GMT+1 Big Sister http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/pm/2011/03/michael_buchanan_in_libya.shtml?page=52#comment11 Not only is he using two IDs, Fred, but he is 'impersonating' - which certainly contravenes House Rules. Tue 15 Mar 2011 10:53:49 GMT+1 Fearless Fred http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/pm/2011/03/michael_buchanan_in_libya.shtml?page=47#comment10 Here's the "w" to replace the erroneous "e" in my previous post... Tue 15 Mar 2011 10:01:45 GMT+1 Fearless Fred http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/pm/2011/03/michael_buchanan_in_libya.shtml?page=42#comment9 Oh dear, mac. Posting using teo IDs again? You know the mods don't like you doing that..... Tue 15 Mar 2011 10:00:33 GMT+1 U14813913 http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/pm/2011/03/michael_buchanan_in_libya.shtml?page=38#comment8 This post has been Removed Tue 15 Mar 2011 02:06:44 GMT+1 U14813913 http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/pm/2011/03/michael_buchanan_in_libya.shtml?page=33#comment7 This post has been Removed Tue 15 Mar 2011 01:57:18 GMT+1 Sindy http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/pm/2011/03/michael_buchanan_in_libya.shtml?page=28#comment6 6. AlanPenderWhen do you fly out, Mac? Mon 14 Mar 2011 22:32:42 GMT+1 U14806484 http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/pm/2011/03/michael_buchanan_in_libya.shtml?page=23#comment5 This post has been Removed Mon 14 Mar 2011 21:04:06 GMT+1 DiY http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/pm/2011/03/michael_buchanan_in_libya.shtml?page=19#comment4 2. Anne P I think you have hit the nail on the head!They are all getting bit twitchy and I think the latest news that The House of Saud is clamping down on their citizens and attempting to prevent demonstrations only goes to prove it. Thu 10 Mar 2011 19:17:11 GMT+1 U14806484 http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/pm/2011/03/michael_buchanan_in_libya.shtml?page=14#comment3 This post has been Removed Thu 10 Mar 2011 17:04:38 GMT+1 U14806484 http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/pm/2011/03/michael_buchanan_in_libya.shtml?page=9#comment2 This post has been Removed Thu 10 Mar 2011 17:02:31 GMT+1 Anne P http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/pm/2011/03/michael_buchanan_in_libya.shtml?page=4#comment1 Or are they too worried that their own people at home might be deciding to sort them out? Thu 10 Mar 2011 12:02:20 GMT+1 DiY http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/pm/2011/03/michael_buchanan_in_libya.shtml?page=0#comment0 I wonder why The League of Arab States remain so quiet, after all Libya is ranked at Number 8 out of 22 so should they not be sorting out their own? Wed 09 Mar 2011 18:22:52 GMT+1