Comments for http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thereporters/maggieshiels/2011/01/gadget_show_visual_assault.html http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thereporters/maggieshiels/2011/01/gadget_show_visual_assault.html en-gb 30 Wed 08 Jul 2015 02:54:12 GMT+1 A feed of user comments from the page found at http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thereporters/maggieshiels/2011/01/gadget_show_visual_assault.html Rob http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thereporters/maggieshiels/2011/01/gadget_show_visual_assault.html?page=83#comment5 I too was confused by the non-standard approach to captions (or not) used in this blog. But I worked it out ;-) Wed 12 Jan 2011 09:19:03 GMT+1 Popher http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thereporters/maggieshiels/2011/01/gadget_show_visual_assault.html?page=66#comment4 @John Seto - captions wouldnt end with a colon (signifying they refer to what follows), if they were referring to the photo above. Also, by your means of reading, all the captions were wrong.On the post, looks great! Though always worrying to see people destroying paper books! Sun 09 Jan 2011 18:01:53 GMT+1 ace9988 http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thereporters/maggieshiels/2011/01/gadget_show_visual_assault.html?page=50#comment3 and thats the samsung largest 3D LED tv not sharps FALSE ADVERTISING !! :P Sun 09 Jan 2011 01:41:05 GMT+1 chineseJohn http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thereporters/maggieshiels/2011/01/gadget_show_visual_assault.html?page=33#comment2 @Alan - you're right .... I made the mistake of always reading captions underneath pictures .... Sat 08 Jan 2011 15:30:43 GMT+1 Alan http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thereporters/maggieshiels/2011/01/gadget_show_visual_assault.html?page=16#comment1 No it isn't. The text before the Panasonic pic says 'Panasonic made heavy play with their offerings:' Fri 07 Jan 2011 16:01:29 GMT+1 chineseJohn http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thereporters/maggieshiels/2011/01/gadget_show_visual_assault.html?page=0#comment0 The first picture is wrong, it's the Panasonic stand Fri 07 Jan 2011 13:35:36 GMT+1