http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/opensecrets/2009/07/are_you_the_problem.html en-gb 30 Thu 31 Dec 2009 00:35:25 GMT+1 A feed of user comments from the page found at http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/opensecrets/2009/07/are_you_the_problem.html http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/opensecrets/2009/07/are_you_the_problem.html?page=17#comment6 No, the BBC and other media outlets are the real problem. I remember when the BBC was trawling for conservative politicians to oppose Mr Major over the Maastricht treaty and other issues relating to the eu. Politicians that before and after have been shunned by the BBC were suddenly on every news programme and were invited to appear on Question Time. This was the BBC at its worse, magnifying and caricaturing disunity to its utmost. It continues to do this to this day with the current government also the subject of similarly unfair coverage.This activity has had the effect of distorting the way political parties behave, with the sanctity of party unity potentially getting in the way of honest debate and high quality argument. I believe the FOI act will make this even worse where it appears that a decent conversation in Cabinet will be stifled.We simply do not know if voters like or dislike parties that allow rainbow opinions to flourish. Until we clean up the BBC it is pointless trying to blame news consumers if what they consume is bad.Once we have straight reporting and fair coverage, then perhaps we can be in a position to make a judgement. Sun 19 Jul 2009 14:38:30 GMT+1 http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/opensecrets/2009/07/are_you_the_problem.html?page=14#comment5 Even with an FOI Act can we rely on the government to tell us the truth in the replies they give?In Wales the LibDems did an FOI request into first class flights on planes to civil servants as part of a business mission. The reply from the First Minister was."It had been "repugnant" to allege that civil servants had flown first class. "Civil servants do not use first class travel" said the First Minister. "I don't think I've ever used first class travel. But certainly civil servants can't. I don't think I ever have to be honest. And if I can't I'm sure they can't".It was, in fact, "an outright lie.""He now says"Yesterday at the weekly press lobby briefing, I stated, on the clear and explicit advice from the relevant senior officials that no officials from IBW (International Business Wales) had flown first class.Today I have learned that this is not the case. I apologise for having misled you and the wider public.I need hardly say how disturbed I am by this latest information now to hand." He has now called for an investigation"This review will be led from outside the Assembly Government. This will be in addition to, and quite separate from, the work which is being put in place to review our civil service expenses system"People are calling for the review to include all public services and institutions that receive our money. The problem is that most have been so deregulated to put any scandal at arms length from government that he is going to have to change the law to do it.Unfortunately given the mess that is Welsh devolution he does not have the power to do it, and it seems that no FOI request is going to tell us why not! Thu 16 Jul 2009 07:33:28 GMT+1 http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/opensecrets/2009/07/are_you_the_problem.html?page=11#comment4 It is not the disucssions themselves that are important but rather the underpinnings of those discussions. As Cicero said "Cui Bono"...to benefit whom...Politicians have leanred how to speak in nebulous terms in fear that honest discussion may leak to the public. The budget is the only real policy statement and who gets the money and the priorities for spending the money are the proof of the pudding. Wed 15 Jul 2009 18:58:11 GMT+1 http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/opensecrets/2009/07/are_you_the_problem.html?page=8#comment3 The last question was interesting. And I thought about it and can truely say I switch my vote between two Partys when one displeases me. NOw if they were both disunited - well I do not know, Martin.I had a full Email box today. I know I am a miserable old poster but in the matter under discussion - contact hasn't stopped between family members in the four main countries concerned. And I suspect Martin that fact hasn't gone unnoticed by whomsoever.And photographs of a late mother unknown to me before 2005 (at least visually) - and half siblings and other relatives are proudly perused and printed.So while Secrets might not be quite as officially Open as I would want them to be in one matter - whilst families talk and Email - life does go on. Wed 15 Jul 2009 17:27:25 GMT+1 http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/opensecrets/2009/07/are_you_the_problem.html?page=5#comment2 If there is one golden rule in British politics, it's that divided parties suffer. We can see from the importance placed on unity at conferences at the major parties see total unity as an absolute necessity. I think if proper discussion, as reported in minutes, were published the headlines would be along the lines of 'Crisis and division is X party'. This is not to lay blame totally at the door of the media, but i think it's a real factor.It's very interesting to hear about a radical change to collective responsibility, and in many ways more openness would be a great thing, but publishing more minutes is far from certain to bring it about Wed 15 Jul 2009 13:36:17 GMT+1 http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/opensecrets/2009/07/are_you_the_problem.html?page=2#comment1 YES and NO is the answer to that.I cannot speak for the public but my observation is that issues like expenses cut across party lines into honest or dishonest MPs and we then look at the Parties.It seems that unity to conceal corruption is now wholly unacceptable.Funny you should mention devolution as it has not brought more open government, in fact the reverse seems to be the case. We have just had an almighty row in the Welsh Parliament over the issue of the Deputy First Minister refusing to release a secret report to the Finance Committee.Those Assembly Members who demanded he make the report public have been branded disloyal, and while they may have had their own agenda they went against their own party and coalition, for which on balance is something they should be applauded for.Yes I would vote for Assembly Members who try to bring more open government but no to their own party for trying to stop them.Its not a question of unity but of honesty.What is needed is root and branch reform not just of government but of all public spending bodies some of which are funded by Quangos. Higher education funding councils hand over millions to universities the autonomy of which is causing serious problems with collaboration so we the tax payer can get value for money.Autonomy is also a barrier to public accountability for how they spend our money and also the claims they make for their expenses. This situation has been created by successive governments. Its like giving MPs carte blanche with an expense account, when you finally make public how they have used it, then there is going to be a scandal.Meanwhile here is an example of what happens when it all goes wronghttp://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/mid/8140494.stmI have applied to the ICO for a copy of the report into their finances so we can find out what went wrong, who was held to account, and what has been done about it. Why with record numbers going into higher education is this university failing?The report was commissioned by the Higher Education Funding Council for Wales who has refused to hand it over for fear of job losses.They are right of course, but what they did not mention was the loss of their own jobs for allowing this situation to happen in the first place!If David Cameron is serious about bringing an end to serfdom and Quangos then here is a good place to start. Having said that to make my original point, I am not a conservative but I would support any party on these issues irrespective of the fact that they have had to put their own house in order as you have to start somewhere.Having made a good start please carry on and apply the same to all those services and institutions paid for by our taxes.The public has shown unity on these issues the politicians should do the same. Wed 15 Jul 2009 13:18:56 GMT+1 http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/opensecrets/2009/07/are_you_the_problem.html?page=0#comment0 I certainly think there should be more openness and honesty in politics. I cannot see any justification for not routinely publishing minutes of cabinet meetings, with the obvious exception of any matters of a sensitive security-related nature.I disagree with the premise of your question about disunited parties. Yes, I would probably prefer to vote for a united party, other things being equal, although it's not the most important determinant of whom to vote for. But so what? Publishing meetings would show a party to be disunited only if they actually were disunited. That's fair enough, surely? If they were all in agreement, the minutes would show that too.Is the real premise behind your question that all parties are disunited, and we only think we are voting for united parties if they are good at hiding their disunity?Personally, I feel strongly about open government, and would be more likely to vote for a party that made government open and honest, irrespective of what this might reveal about their unity or lack of it. Wed 15 Jul 2009 12:45:36 GMT+1