Comments for en-gb 30 Thu 28 Aug 2014 11:33:48 GMT+1 A feed of user comments from the page found at Anuvrat The day MYHOO!! went down......."Microsoft..There is melancholy in the wind at the Microsoft camp. Yes it wanted to add Yahoo!! to its repertoire but hey Mr. Yang ain't gonna go without a fight!... but how resilient Microsoft is, time will unfold!! Yahoo!!" Every morning in Africa, a gazelle wakes up. It knows it must run faster than the fastest Lion or it will be killed. Every morning a Lion wakes up, it knows it must outrun the slowest gazelle or it will starve to death. It doesn't matter whether you are a Lion or a Gazelle.When the SUN comes up,You better start running..."In todays competitive netvironment one has to be on there toes...otherwise Microsoft is always hungry. Google!!Whew!! The day when after years of dominance they almost faced a formidable challenger - MYHOO!! .The rest of the World!!For the netvironment to prosper healthy competition is paramount.The joint adventure between Yahoo!! and Microsoft would have been disruptive but could have brought about balance to this one sided battle. The most difficult task for this merger would have been to work as a cohesive organization - their cultures being miles apart. For the consumer it would have meant a better Web 3.0 but'Ka Kari' - what to do?. For now Yahoo!! is away from Microsoft's ambit but,On the horizon looms a threat - the Goofgles !! Sun 04 May 2008 19:27:47 GMT+1 knowles2 I expecting this, Microsoft and Yahoo would never have work, their employees hate each other to much.I also think that Microsoft choose the wrong time to try and buy yahoo as they have several projects underway which may increase revenue and increase how much Yahoo is worth. From few interviews I have read from Yahoo shareholders they was not exactly happy with Microsoft offer neither, which explains why Microsoft did not take the hostile take over route through they apparently had alternative directors lined and ready to go in. I think their lots of people celebrating here, Microsoft and yahoo employees. Microsoft shareholders, yahoo board of directors who hates Microsoft with passion. And the majority of Yahoo customers.Google will not be so happy as Microsoft will now be going after the web 2.0/3.0 start ups Google will want to buy but now Microsoft will have more cash in the bank to out bid them. And if Microsoft did buy the Yahoo, Google knew it could fly in and take the best of the best of Yahoo Engineers, who would be running towards the back exits as Baller come through the front door and leave Microsoft with years of work to actually connect all their services up and make them all run together, especially with Microsoft non slandered software, formats. While Google could of just bought smaller more dynamic companies and continue their market expansion. Now through Google will have to fight a single minded Microsoft who sole aim is to destroy Google and take over the web.And of cause baller will not be n happy because Microsoft for once been force into full retreat by a tech company and this could inspire other companies to refuse Microsoft money, which make buying other companies more difficult.Guest it all balances out in end, now I like forward to a good old three way fight between these three juggernaut's of the internet, well until some young up start comes out of know where in knocking all three out for the count. Sun 04 May 2008 16:56:32 GMT+1 digital00 Eric Schmidt (Google CEO) said in a recent interview he wants all users to have a choice in the market when it comes to using their products and services. As they can afford to give their products away for free, where other companies would have to charge, there's not much consumer choice...or is there?Why did the acquisition not go through? Yahoo! knows their user base and massive audience is their major strength; clearly Yahoo! believes this is strong enough to see them return as a force without Microsoft support.Here's my take on the trends of how each company has grown their markets.Google way:1) Enter market through acquisition or (rarely) in house technology2) Marginalise competitors in space by offering products for free3) Heavy losses in new market supported by only profit generating product - AdWords.4) Build market share while developing product5) Begin charging for product6) Generate revenue and profitMicrosoft way:1) Enter market through acquisition or in house technology2) Muscle out competitors in space through economies of scale3) Heavy losses in new market supported by core profit generating products4) Build market share while developing product5) Generate revenue and profitMicrohoo! Way1) Enter market through acquisition or in house technology2) Introduce product to user base, grow and retain market share through massive collective user base and audience3) Heavy losses supported by core profit generating products4) Build market share while developing product5) Generate revenue and profitWhat made Microsoft so unpopular (amongst others), and will make Google so unpopular, is their second step in growing new markets and products - marginalising existing businesses is another way of bullying your competitors.Where Google leverage off the profit and revenue generated by AdWords to launch new products, Microsoft would have been able to leverage off the combined massive MS\Yahoo user base. Sure, the consumer wins in the short term as we all save money...while it's free, but don't forget Google is a publically traded company and is openly going down the Software as A Service [SAS] route. Google WILL start charging for SAS eventually, by then it will be too late for consumer choice... Sun 04 May 2008 14:58:00 GMT+1 Adil super_tux, u are right but we should not take google as easy, it going to become BIGGER EVIL than MS as it got monopoly on internet. Today i am using Google apps for my company what if tomorrow they charge me for that? since all the companies around will be shut down, i will got no option but to pay them, so we should not take Google easy, it is same evil as MS. Sun 04 May 2008 10:19:23 GMT+1 digitalrant I'm not sure sure it is good news in the long term.Google is streaking ahead and I thought that the two major competitors joining together might actually make the playing field more level. Currently Google can make or break companies with their market share of search. People just assume Google's "don't be evil" motto will protect them - I don't want to put all my eggs in one basket. Sun 04 May 2008 10:17:31 GMT+1 Adil I have mixed feelings about this whole thing, at one time i think they should merge and when i saw them as one company, the possible problems can come make me thing they should not.And i think they have make a good decision, in this way they will not rely on any other company and they will stand on their own foots as adult in this new web environment.Best wishes for both companies. Sun 04 May 2008 10:16:26 GMT+1 drunkenmonkey Fantastic news! Put a smile on my face on this Sunday morning, at least now I can go and renew my flickr account and not delete it! Sun 04 May 2008 09:41:17 GMT+1 super_tux I think it is a shame but for a rather perverse reason! The idea of Microsoft effectively throwing away tens of billions of dollars comforted me as it could only expedite their eventual demise. I live, work and breath IT and it is becoming crystal clear the future is based on the Google model not the Microsoft one. When I look at my all my gadgets and gizmo's I see the common link being the internet not the PC. Microsoft have never done the internet well, they don't understand the idea of providing the commodity for free and making the money on the service. If they had purchased Yahoo, they would have tried to tie people in to their software and their protocols making the whole thing very inflexible, just look at IE with its ActiveX, MSN instant messenger, Media Player, Office... ? That is the Microsoft way and it seems a very outdated way of doing business in the 21st Century. My Asus eee does not run Windows, nor does my phone nor my media centre nor my games console. In fact everything I now use to connect the the internet on a regular basis would not benefit at all from Microsoft software in any way, shape or form! My Apple runs OSX, My PC runs Kubuntu, as does my wife's, my son's and even my ten year old daughter's! And like everyone else I know, our home pages are all set to! For me, anything Microsoft is just something extra to uninstall. Sun 04 May 2008 09:20:25 GMT+1 Unanswerable Relief. Microsoft grabbed huge market share for Internet Explorer by simply offering it as the default Windows browser. That's what killed Netscape. We know this.If MS bought Yahoo they would probably make it the default search page in IE instead of MSN, then build Yahoo based links into loads of applications (i.e. offering Yahoo Mapping of a contact's location by default in Outlook). They would steadily push users into visiting Yahoo "by accident" and then claim users were choosing it over Google.This method of controlling default setting through the operating system gets around anti-competition laws, and works because so few users bother to change defaults or install alternative software when there's something usable in the OS. Sun 04 May 2008 08:06:11 GMT+1