BBC Home

Explore the BBC

Browse: Tennis

23 comments

user rating: 3 star

Andy murray own rafa on hc

by Football_Monk (U14385719) 14 August 2010
comment on the article

Andy owns rafa like his property on hc and there is no denying. Bad match up yada, yada, blah, blah waste of excuses.. No reasons, he is just a better hc player.

Latest 10 comments

Read members' comments or add your own

posted Aug 14, 2010

Nadal´s defeat, as I correctly predicted(see my article "Murray-Nadal"), will do nothing to affect his chances of winning the USO.

His strategy to take it easy (not trying his maximum)today is the right one -- why should one risk injuries for a Mster 1000 which he already won twice?

USO is different, it is a GS, which everyone tries his maximum. If Nadal got to the semis with a abdominal tear in 2009, only losing to the eventual champion, the healthier Nadal this year to go a few steps further is no exaggeration.

Nadal will win the USO 2010. Prepare your bet!

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Aug 14, 2010

"On the basis of having the best record on hard courts last year, and smashing nadal, yet again, thoadd to the Aus final. Grown up racist Murray hater."

---------------

On the basis of LAST year's harcourt record? You obviously don't understand the words "at THIS point in time" doh

You are obviously a Murray fan boy, anyone who doesn't hail him as a god is a hater. Where did racism come into it? I actually have a Murray in my family you fool.

Fact is last year, how many hard court slams did he win? None. At the astralian Open this year he did indeed beat rafa... but who won the title? Yeah Federer not Andy. How well did he do in Indian Wells and Miami? And how well did he play against Monfils in this tournament?

Ok I revise my statement, it's on the basis of his last TWO matches. But no more.

And you WUM, I said if he does continue the form then he will be hard to beat, so I gave him credit. But saying he is the best on the basis of two matches is a little premature

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Aug 14, 2010

"On the basis of this one tournament?"

Murray has a winning record against Federer, Djokovic, Del Potro and Roddick on h/c, and has won 4 of the last 5 against Nadal on h/c. I certainly think he's capable of winning the USO if he's able to play his best tennis on the biggest occasion, like Del Potro last year.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Aug 14, 2010

Nadal yet again runs away from a match with Federer on US North American hard courts. Chicken!

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Aug 15, 2010

Federer is the probably the best Hard Court player. But Murray is a close 2nd.

Murray has beaten Nadal 4 times out of the last 5 on hard courts, it's the other surfaces where Nadal destroys Murray.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Aug 15, 2010

......"Ok I revise my statement, it's on the basis of his last TWO matches. But no more."

You speak utter tosh.
AM ranking is in the top 5 players in the WORLD....... this is based on achievements........ so take your whimsical engerlish angst back to the Man U forum before I lose may temper with you.
Idiot

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Aug 15, 2010

RT Fan: Didn't Nadal beat Soderling on a hard court in January 2010? Or is Soderling suddenly not a "top hard court player" any more?

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Aug 15, 2010

I think that we have to get things in perspective here. Nadal leads Murray 8-0 on Grand Slam wins, and even 1-0 on HC Slams. Not taking anything away from Murray, as he has bundles of talent and potential but on the Grand Slam circait he still has to step up to a line that Nadal already crossed as a young teenager.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Aug 15, 2010

Away from all the extremely boring 'will he wont't he' that people on here insist on having whenever murray has a result of note - always either a really good or bad one - murray played very well last night and i think people should just enjoy that rather than argue nonsense. Good luck to him against federer, i do think that if he doesn't put too much pressure on himself to beat federer and fed doesn't play like he did set first/second set AO final murry will probably win... Which incidently would be an extremly impresive feat that may be the greatest of his career so far. By that i mean beating nadal fed back to back.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Aug 15, 2010

"You speak utter tosh.
AM ranking is in the top 5 players in the WORLD....... this is based on achievements........ so take your whimsical engerlish angst back to the Man U forum before I lose may temper with you.
Idiot"


--------------------------

Firstly what has being top 5 got to do with being the best hard court player at this moment? The 2 don't relate. There are 5 top 5 players, they're not ALL the best hardcourt player. You can't even understand plain English doh I never said he wasn't a good player, I questioned him being declared the best hardcourt player on the basis of two matcxhes. As I said, Nalbandian was the best last week. For pete's sake, you have to base who is playing best over a couple of weeks not two matches.

Secondly, I have as much Scottish blood as I do English and I hate Man U. Your conclusions are hilarious. You're obviously a scot who can't take that anyone does not worship Andy. Grow up mate. He is a very good player but it's crazy to declare anyone the best on Hardcourt this early into the hardcourt season when no-one has had an outstanding week (Murray has played well in 2 matches but not the whole week)

add comment | complain about this comment

Comment on this article

Sorry, you can only contribute to 606 during opening hours. These are 0900-2300 UK time, seven days a week, but may vary to accommodate sporting events and UK public holidays.

RATE THIS ARTICLE

Rate Breakdown

  • 5 42.86%
    6 votes
  • 4
    0 votes
  • 3
    0 votes
  • 2
    0 votes
  • 1 57.14%
    8 votes

average rating:
2.71 from 14 votes